Area Estimation of Deep-Sea Surfaces from Oblique Still Images

Estimating the area of seabed surfaces from pictures or videos is an important problem in seafloor surveys. This task is complex to achieve with moving platforms such as submersibles, towed or remotely operated vehicles (ROV), where the recording camera is typically not static and provides an oblique view of the seafloor. A new method for obtaining seabed surface area estimates is presented here, using the classical set up of two laser devices fixed to the ROV frame projecting two parallel lines over the seabed. By combining lengths measured directly from the image containing the laser lines, the area of seabed surfaces is estimated, as well as the camera’s distance to the seabed, pan and tilt angles. The only parameters required are the distance between the parallel laser lines and the camera’s horizontal and vertical angles of view. The method was validated with a controlled in situ experiment using a deep-sea ROV, yielding an area estimate error of 1.5%. Further applications and generalizations of the method are discussed, with emphasis on deep-sea applications.

[1]  Kenneth L. Smith,et al.  Coupling of near‐bottom pelagic and benthic processes at abyssal depths in the eastern North Pacific Ocean , 1994 .

[2]  Jaime S. Davies,et al.  Marine Litter Distribution and Density in European Seas, from the Shelves to Deep Basins , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  W. Waldo Wakefield,et al.  The use of a Canadian (perspective) grid in deep-sea photography , 1987 .

[4]  Alan Williams,et al.  A vessel-towed camera platform for surveying seafloor habitats of the continental shelf , 1999 .

[5]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[6]  J. Henriet,et al.  Environmental setting of deep-water oysters in the Bay of Biscay , 2010 .

[7]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics , 2012 .

[8]  J. Gutt,et al.  Semi-Automated Image Analysis for the Assessment of Megafaunal Densities at the Arctic Deep-Sea Observatory HAUSGARTEN , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  et all Rogério dos Santos Alves,et al.  A geological model of polymetallic nodule deposits in the Clarion Clipperton Fracture zone , 2014, IGARSS 2014.

[10]  A. Purser,et al.  Managing Impacts of Deep-seA reSource exploitation , 2014 .

[11]  Malcolm B. Jones,et al.  Identification of patch structure within marine benthic landscapes using a remotely operated vehicle , 2003 .

[12]  V. Huvenne,et al.  Sedimentary processes in the middle Nazaré Canyon , 2011 .

[13]  R. Tong,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Distribution of Deep-Water Gorgonian Corals in Relation to Seabed Topography on the Norwegian Margin , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  David Connor,et al.  Marine Monitoring Handbook , 2001 .

[15]  Rahul Sharma,et al.  Deep-sea mining: Economic, technical, technological, and environmental considerations for sustainable development , 2011 .

[16]  Rf Tusting,et al.  IMPROVED METHODS FOR VISUAL AND PHOTOGRAPHIC BENTHIC SURVEYS. , 1993 .

[17]  T. Morato,et al.  Abundance of litter on Condor seamount (Azores, Portugal, Northeast Atlantic) , 2013 .

[18]  Jaume Piera,et al.  Hierarchical segmentation-based software for cover classification analyses of seabed images (Seascape) , 2011 .

[19]  Malcolm B. Jones,et al.  ROV Image Scaling with Laser Spot Patterns , 2000 .

[20]  E. R. Cohen.  An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1998 .

[21]  Vasilis Trygonis,et al.  photoQuad: A dedicated seabed image processing software, and a comparative error analysis of four photoquadrat methods , 2012 .

[22]  Jn Heine,et al.  Diving for Science...1993 , 1993 .

[23]  M. Shortisa,et al.  of the Status and Trends in Underwater Videometric Measurement , 2007 .