Zeta potential, gel formation and compressive strength of low calcium fly ash geopolymers

A major challenge in the specification of geopolymer mix designs is the variability in the fly ash used and the impact of that variability on the performance of the geopolymer produced. The factors affecting the performance of geopolymers made from a total of five chemically and physically distinct fly ashes are reported. The key factor identified as influencing the strength was the workability, with a flow in the range between 110 ± 5% and 140 ± 5% required for optimal performance. In this flow range, the strength of geopolymer is governed by the specific surface area of precursor fly ash coupled with the quantity of the 10 lm and 20 lm particles. In addition a negative zeta potential of the fly ash was identified as assisting gel formation with the smaller the negative zeta potential of the geopolymer product the more gel formation and high compressive strength observed.

[1]  V. Sirivivatnanon,et al.  Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer , 2007 .

[2]  K. Sagoe-Crentsil,et al.  Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: Part I—Low Si/Al ratio systems , 2007 .

[3]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future , 1999 .

[4]  X. Querol,et al.  Environmental, physical and structural characterisation of geopolymer matrixes synthesised from coal (co-)combustion fly ashes. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  Rubina Chaudhary,et al.  Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review , 2007 .

[6]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[7]  C. Chen,et al.  Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation , 2010 .

[8]  Prinya Chindaprasirt,et al.  Workability and strength of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Pan Chen,et al.  Modeling of Carbon Dioxide Measurement on Cement Plants , 2012 .

[10]  Kwesi Sagoe-Crentsil,et al.  Lightweight geopolymer made of highly porous siliceous materials with various Na2O/Al2O3 and SiO2/Al2O3 ratios , 2011 .

[11]  Martyn Jones,et al.  The Production of Low Energy Cements , 2019, Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete.

[12]  Jadambaa Temuujin,et al.  Thermal analysis of geopolymer pastes synthesised from five fly ashes of variable composition , 2012 .

[13]  Keun-Hyeok Yang,et al.  Properties of cementless mortars activated by sodium silicate , 2008 .

[14]  J. Provis.  Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: why, how, and what? , 2014 .

[15]  D. Huntzinger,et al.  A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies , 2009 .

[16]  E. Gartner.  Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements ☆ , 2004 .

[17]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  The characterisation of source materials in fly ash-based geopolymers , 2003 .

[18]  Ramasubramania Iyer.  The surface chemistry of leaching coal fly ash. , 2002, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  Waltraud M. Kriven,et al.  The effect of alkali and Si/Al ratio on the development of mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers , 2007 .

[20]  N. Roussel,et al.  An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends , 2011 .

[21]  Ali Nazari,et al.  Distribution of oxides in fly ash controls strength evolution of geopolymers , 2014 .

[22]  C. Meyer.  The greening of the concrete industry , 2009 .

[23]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Composition and Microstructure of Alkali Activated Fly Ash Binder: Effect of the Activator , 2005 .

[24]  Shigemitsu Hatanaka,et al.  High-Strength Geopolymer Using Fine High-Calcium Fly Ash , 2011 .

[25]  Kyung-Taek Koh,et al.  The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators , 2013 .

[26]  T. Bakharev,et al.  Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack , 2005 .

[27]  J. Davidovits.  High-Alkali Cements for 21st Century Concretes , 1994, "SP-144: Concrete Technology: Past, Present, and Future".

[28]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Sustainable cement production—present and future , 2011 .

[29]  R. N. Lieberman,et al.  Coal fly ash as a potential fixation reagent for radioactive wastes , 2015 .

[30]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  Effect of the Alkali Metal Activator on the Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers , 1999 .

[31]  Á. Palomo,et al.  Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements , 2003 .

[32]  K. Sagoe-Crentsil,et al.  Relationships between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers , 2005 .

[33]  Andi Arham Adam,et al.  Strength and durability properties of alkali activated slag and fly ash-based geopolymer concrete , 2009 .

[34]  W. P. Miller,et al.  Composition and element solubility of magnetic and non-magnetic fly ash fractions. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[35]  Xian Zheng Gong,et al.  CO2 Emissions due to Cement Manufacture , 2011 .

[36]  David W. Law,et al.  Long term durability properties of class F fly ash geopolymer concrete , 2015 .

[37]  E. Allouche,et al.  Factors affecting the suitability of fly ash as source material for geopolymers , 2010 .