Publisher Summary Traditional thermal treatments are a cornerstone of the food industry providing required safety profiles and extensions of shelf-life. However, such treatments may lead to losses of desired organoleptic properties and damage to temperature labile nutrients and vitamins. Consequently, novel thermal and nonthermal technologies have been designed to meet the required food product safety or shelf-life demands while minimizing the effects on a product's nutritional and quality attributes. There is a general consensus among the regulatory agencies that novel technologies are of benefit to both food processors and consumers alike. Given the complexities of food matrices and the range of foods produced, validating processes is a challenge for industry. More expedited validation processes are likely with validation of comparable products for a given technology. These technological drivers for validation are: shelf-life extension, nutritional and sensory aspects, novel functional and organoleptic properties, consumer acceptability, and environmental impact. For the best preservation method, combining a nonthermal process with conventional preservation or another nonthermal technology may enhance the overall antimicrobial effect so that lower process intensities can be employed. This approach, known as “hurdle technology,” has already been applied successfully using traditional techniques of food preservation. Combining nonthermal methods with other food preservation techniques can enhance the lethal effects of nonthermal processing, reduce the severity of nonthermal treatment needed to obtain a given level of microbial inactivation, and prevent the proliferation of survivors following treatment.
[1]
James G. Lyng,et al.
Shelf life and sensory attributes of a fruit smoothie-type beverage processed with moderate heat and pulsed electric fields
,
2010
.
[2]
António A. Vicente,et al.
Environmental impact of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies in food processing
,
2010
.
[3]
Bärbel Geisel,et al.
Consumer attitudes to high pressure food processing
,
2003
.
[4]
Ruben P. Jolie,et al.
Pectins in Processed Fruit and Vegetables: Part I—Stability and Catalytic Activity of Pectinases
,
2009
.
[5]
W. Messens,et al.
The use of high pressure to modify the functionality of food proteins
,
1997
.
[6]
A. Vicente,et al.
Novel thermal processing technologies
,
2007
.
[7]
D. Knorr,et al.
The impact of pressure, temperature and treatment time on starches: pressure-induced starch gelatinisation as pressure time temperature indicator for high hydrostatic pressure processing
,
2005
.
[8]
Gustavo V. Barbosa-Cánovas,et al.
Nonthermal Preservation of Foods Using Combined Processing Techniques
,
2003,
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.
[9]
Armand V. Cardello,et al.
Consumer perceptions of foods processed by innovative and emerging technologies: A conjoint analytic study
,
2007
.