The technological roadmap of Cisco's business ecosystem

Abstract A business ecosystem provides a new perspective for repositioning a company's strategy in order to aggressively further its own interests and to promote its overall ecosystem health. Analyzing a business ecosystem is not an easy task, and therefore only a few studies have been made, even though some scholars and managers accept this concept from ecology since value creation is achieved by establishing a platform that other members of the ecosystem can use to enhance their performance. This paper presents a case study based on both qualitative and quantitative data, by explaining how Cisco Systems has been so successful in utilizing its strategy of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) for corporate growth based on a business ecosystem, especially from a technological perspective. We use US patent data from 1993 to 2005 to illustrate Cisco's technological roadmap. Finally, implications of symbiosis, platform, and co-evolution are provided for managers to challenge the contemporary business environment.

[1]  James F. Moore.  The rise of a new corporate form , 1998 .

[2]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Who captures value in a global innovation network?: the case of Apple's iPod , 2009, CACM.

[4]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Simon Mosey,et al.  The Management of Innovation and Technology , 2006 .

[6]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  An analysis of geographical agglomeration and modularized industrial networks in a regional cluster: A case study at Yamagata prefecture in Japan , 2008 .

[7]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Morphology Analysis for Technology Roadmapping: Application of Text Mining , 2007 .

[8]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  The Discipline of Market Leaders , 1995 .

[11]  John G. Singer.  Framing brand management for marketing ecosystems , 2006 .

[12]  Terry L. Amburgey,et al.  Organizational Ecology: Past, Present, and Future Directions , 1996 .

[13]  P. Cooke.  Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Who Captures Value in a Global Innovation System? The case of Apple's iPod , 2007 .

[15]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Strategic use of the Internet and e-commerce: Cisco Systems , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  QTIP: Quick technology intelligence processes , 2005 .

[17]  Gregory N. Hearn,et al.  Value creating ecologies : understanding next generation business systems , 2006 .

[18]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[19]  Neil Gandal,et al.  The Dvd Versus Divx Standard War: Empirical Evidence of Network Effects and Preannouncement Effects , 2002 .

[20]  J. Ross,et al.  Beyond the Business Case: New Approaches to IT Investment , 2002 .

[21]  Sanjiv Gossain,et al.  Reinventing value: The new business ecosystem , 1998 .

[22]  H. Chesbrough.  Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models , 2007 .

[23]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[24]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Innovating Business Models with Co-Development Partnerships , 2007 .

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[26]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Economic Action Does Not Take Place in a Vacuum: Understanding Cisco's Acquisition and Development Strategy , 2002 .

[27]  Paul M. Horn.  The Changing Nature of Innovation , 2005 .

[28]  Ernest A. Lowe,et al.  Creating by-product resource exchanges: Strategies for eco-industrial parks , 1997 .

[29]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[30]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[31]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[32]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry , 2002 .

[33]  D. V. Beers,et al.  Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone , 2007 .

[34]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg , 1997 .

[36]  Ron Adner.  Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[37]  Pierre Berthon,et al.  Insights from ecology: an ecotone perspective of marketing , 2000 .

[38]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[39]  P. Dobson.  Competing, Countervailing, and Coalescing Forces: The Economics of Intra- and Inter-Business System Competition , 2006 .

[40]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons , 2004 .

[41]  James F. Moore.  Business Ecosystems and the View from the Firm , 2006 .

[42]  Gregory L. Richards,et al.  The Information Technology Ecosystem: Structure, Health, and Performance , 2006 .

[43]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[44]  Yuen-Hsien Tseng,et al.  Text mining techniques for patent analysis , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[45]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[46]  G. Dosi,et al.  An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics , 1994 .

[47]  Nicholas Dew,et al.  The more we get together: Coordinating network externality product introduction in the RFID industry , 2007 .

[48]  R. Martin,et al.  Path dependence and regional economic evolution , 2006 .

[49]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .