Comparison of models of faulty induction motors: Performances and applications

This paper proposes a comparison of several circuit models of induction motors with broken bars in terms of representation of the phenomena, identifiability of its parameters as well as computing time. Such a comparison is rare as many papers focus on the presentation of new models. The three models studied in this paper are based on electrical circuit equations obtained using a common set of hypotheses which is important to reach the objectives. The different models are totally equivalent in healthy operations. A d-q stator transformation is used for the implementation of Model 1, a asymmetrical d-q rotor transformation is then added in the case of Model 2 and the application of the theorem of superposition leads to Model 3. Model 1 gives quite accurate results but requires extensive computing time and a precise knowledge of the rotor parameters. Equivalent performances are obtained with Model 2 but with a much lower computing time. The drawback is that the value of the d and q rotor resistances and inductances need to be numerically computed as they are functions of the slip. Finally Model 3 reaches less accurate results for high fault magnitude but in a low computing time and with few parameter knowledge as well as a good interpretation of the faulty machine behaviour. The three presented models cover then the complete range of applications, i.e. from the faulty machine test platform to the on-line diagnosis of machines.

[1]  F. Filippetti,et al.  Broken bar detection in induction machines: comparison between current spectrum approach and parameter estimation approach , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[2]  S. Ferkolj,et al.  Simulation of steady-state and dynamic performance of induction motor for diagnostic purpose , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference Record.

[3]  Hamid A. Toliyat,et al.  Transient analysis of cage induction machines under stator, rotor bar and end ring faults , 1995 .

[4]  A. De Carli,et al.  Parameter identification for induction motor simulation , 1974, Autom..

[5]  G. B. Kliman,et al.  Noninvasive detection of broken rotor bars in operating induction motors , 1988 .

[6]  Johan Gyselinck,et al.  Detection and quantification of faults in induction machines using on-line analytical models , 2006 .

[7]  A. De Carli,et al.  Parameter identification for induction motor simulation , 1976, Autom..

[8]  L. Sainz,et al.  Analysis of the Induction Machine Parameter Identification , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[9]  J. Gyselinck,et al.  Local and global effect of a broken bar in induction machines using fundamental electromagnetic laws and finite element simulations , 2005, 2005 5th IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electric Machines, Power Electronics and Drives.

[10]  T.A. Lipo,et al.  Complex vector model of the squirrel cage induction machine including instantaneous rotor bar currents , 1998, Conference Record of 1998 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Third IAS Annual Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36242).