Improving Transfer of Learning: Relationship to Methods of Using Business Simulation

This study investigates whether the processes associated with the use of business simulations can be structured to improve transfer of learning from the classroom environment to the workplace.The answer to this question is explored by investigating teaching methods used to introduce the simulation, the amount of time students spend on decisions, team decision-making characteristics, and student performance levels in the course. The results indicate that students have higher perceived transfer of learning when they learn the simulation by reading the student manual and from peers rather than from the instructor or from hands-on experience. Also, the results indicate that perceptions of time spent on strategic decisions, financial decisions, and student expectations of their final grade were related to perceived transfer of learning.

[1]  D. Eden,et al.  Seasickness as a self-fulfilling prophecy: raising self-efficacy to boost performance at sea. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  G. M. Haslerud.  Transfer, Memory, and Creativity: After-Learning as Perceptual Process , 1972 .

[3]  Joseph Wolfe,et al.  The Effectiveness of Business Games in Strategic Management Course Work , 1997 .

[4]  Sharon M. Carver,et al.  Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  J. P. Byrnes,et al.  Cognitive Development and Learning in Instructional Contexts , 1995 .

[6]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[7]  Kenneth R. Goosen,et al.  Purpose and Learning Benefits of Simulations: A Design and Development Perspective , 2001 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown.  Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[9]  Gregory S. Black,et al.  Active Versus Passive Course Designs: The Impact on Student Outcomes , 2005 .

[10]  J. Wolfe.  A History of Business Teaching Games in English-Speaking and Post-Socialist Countries: The Origination and Diffusion of a Management Education and Development Technology , 1993 .

[11]  Denise J. Luethge,et al.  The Impact of Involvement on Performance in Business Simulations: An Examination of Goosen's “Know Little” Decision-Making Thesis , 2003 .

[12]  Jack C. Green,et al.  Different Ways to Introduce a Business Simulation: The Effect on Student Performance , 2002 .

[13]  John Fripp,et al.  A future for business simulations , 1997 .

[14]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  T RANSFER OF LEARNING , 1992 .

[15]  Robert W. Hornaday,et al.  Formal Planning and the Performance of Business Simulation Teams , 1996 .

[16]  J. Stigler,et al.  Learning mathematics from classroom instruction: Cross-cultural and experimental perspectives. , 1995 .

[17]  J. Keys,et al.  Teaching Strategic Management with a Business Game , 1997 .

[18]  Abraham K. Korman,et al.  Hypothesis of Work Behavior Revisited and an Extension , 1976 .

[19]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[20]  Philip H. Anderson,et al.  The Relationship between Financial Performance and Other Measures of Learning on a Simulation Exercise , 1990 .

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[22]  Kenneth J. Chapman,et al.  Can a Simulation Help Achieve Course Objectives? An Exploratory Study Investigating Differences Among Instructional Tools , 1999 .

[23]  Declan Doyle,et al.  Using a business simulation to teach applied skills – the benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries , 2000 .

[24]  Henry Adobor,et al.  Management simulations: determining their effectiveness , 2006 .

[25]  Jerry Gosen,et al.  Total enterprise simulation performance and participant learning , 1998 .

[26]  J. Mandler,et al.  Analogical transfer: The roles of schema abstraction and awareness , 1993 .

[27]  Murray Young,et al.  From Tour Guide to Teacher: Deepening Cross-Cultural Competence through International Experience-Based Education , 1997 .

[28]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Domain-Specific Principles Affect Learning and Transfer in Children , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy within the Organizational Context , 1998 .

[30]  Raymond A. Noe,et al.  Employee Training and Development , 2001 .

[31]  Ivo Wenzler,et al.  Why Do We Bother with Games and Simulations: An Organizational Learning Perspective , 1999 .

[32]  C. Douglas Wetzel,et al.  The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A Review of Recent Research , 1992 .

[33]  Clark Aldrich,et al.  Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences , 2005 .

[34]  James D. Klein,et al.  The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment , 2001 .

[35]  Parshotam Dass,et al.  Improving Students’ Self-Efficacy in Strategic Management: The Relative Impact of Cases and Simulations , 2000 .

[36]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[37]  R. Teach.  Profits: The False Prophet in Business Gaming , 1990 .

[38]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[39]  Linda I. Glassop,et al.  The Organizational Benefits of Teams , 2002 .

[40]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  Organization-Based Self-Esteem: Construct Definition, Measurement, And Validation , 1989 .

[41]  H. Simon,et al.  Situated Learning and Education1 , 1996 .

[42]  Quality, excellence, and diversity , 1994 .

[43]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[44]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  A. J. Faria.  Business Simulation Games: Current Usage Levels—An Update , 1998 .

[46]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies , 1995 .