Social Media for Development: Outlining Debates, Theory and Praxis

A commonly used definition of social media derived from the business and management litera- ture refers to a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technologi- cal foundations of Web 2.0, and that allow the creation and exchange of User Generated Content (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010 ). Today there is an extensive literature on the broad social media topic that crosses several disciplines. The literature on business and management has focused on how practitioners may embrace social media technology for knowledge management, forming close bonds with customers and for marketing purposes (e.g. Culnan, McHugh, & Zubillaga, 2010 ). Focused special issues of journals in information systems have improved our understanding of the relationship between social media networks and business transform- ation (Aral, Dellarocas, & Godes, 2013 ; Kane, Alavi, Labianca, & Borgatti, 2014 ). There are also several journals with ongoing discourses on the cultural and political dimensions of social media (see e.g. Information Society, Media Culture and Society and Information Com- munication and Society ). However, to date there has been limited attention specifically to the theoretical and empirical linkage between social media and development. We intend to contrib- ute to the emerging field of social media for development not only by identifying the knowledge gap in this area, but also by offering new avenues which may lead to new conceptual frameworks on social media for development through empirical cases. We also have practical ambitions, that is, addressing business, policy-makers and NGOs, as well as raising the interest of academic col- leagues in the field of ICT for development.

[1]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Development 2.0: the IT-enabled transformation of international development , 2010, CACM.

[2]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[3]  I. Illich Tools for Conviviality , 1973 .

[4]  David Godes,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue - Social Media and Business Transformation: A Framework for Research , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Dorothea Kleine,et al.  POLICY ARENA ICT4WHAT?— USING THE CHOICE FRAMEWORK TO OPERATIONALISE THE CAPABILITY APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT , 2010 .

[7]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  How Large U.S. Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business Value , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[8]  D. Kleine ICT4WHAT?—Using the choice framework to operationalise the capability approach to development , 2010 .

[9]  D. Robey,et al.  Foreword: special issue on information systems in developing countries , 2007 .

[10]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[11]  Asif Afridi Social networks: their role in addressing poverty , 2011 .

[12]  Howard Rheingold Smart mobs : Les communautés intelligentes mobiles comment reconnaître le futur quand il vous tombe dessus ? , 2003 .

[13]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  What's Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda , 2014, MIS Q..

[14]  Maung K. Sein,et al.  Conceptualizing the ICT Artifact: Toward Understanding the Role of ICT in National Development , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[15]  Cherian George The Net Delusion: How not to liberate the world , 2013 .

[16]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[17]  Julian M. Bass,et al.  A Framework Using Institutional Analysis and the Capability Approach in ICT4D , 2013 .

[18]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Conviviality of Internet social networks: An exploratory study of Internet campaigns in Iran , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  M. Turshen Development as Freedom , 2001 .