Mechanical properties of suprarenal and infrarenal abdominal aorta: implications for mouse models of aneurysms.

Multiple mouse models have been developed to increase our understanding of the natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms. An advantage of such models is that one can quantify the time course of changes in geometry, histology, cell biology, and mechanics as a lesion develops. One of the most commonly used mouse models yields lesions in the suprarenal abdominal aorta whereas most other models target the infrarenal abdominal aorta, consistent with the clinical observation that nearly all abdominal aneurysms in humans occur in the infrarenal aorta. Understanding reasons for similarities and differences between diverse mouse models and human lesions may provide increased insight that would not be possible studying a single situation alone. Toward this end, however, we must first compare directly the native structure and properties of these two portions of the abdominal aorta in the mouse. In this paper, we present the first biaxial mechanical data and nonlinear constitutive descriptors for the suprarenal and infrarenal aorta in mice, which reveals only subtle mechanical differences despite marked morphological and histological differences. Such data promise to increase our ability to understand and model the natural history of these deadly lesions.

[1]  Rudolph L. Gleason,et al.  Biomechanical and Microstructural Properties of Common Carotid Arteries from Fibulin-5 Null Mice , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Don P. Giddens,et al.  In vivo assessment of blood flow patterns in abdominal aorta of mice with MRI: implications for AAA localization. , 2009, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[3]  Dean Y. Li,et al.  Effects of elastin haploinsufficiency on the mechanical behavior of mouse arteries. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Influences of Aortic Motion and Curvature on Vessel Expansion in Murine Experimental Aneurysms , 2011, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[5]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  Mechanics of Carotid Arteries in a Mouse Model of Marfan Syndrome , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Fundamental role of axial stress in compensatory adaptations by arteries. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  S. P. Walton,et al.  Smooth muscle phenotypic modulation is an early event in aortic aneurysms. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  D. Vorp,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  J D Humphrey,et al.  A multiaxial computer-controlled organ culture and biomechanical device for mouse carotid arteries. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Peter Libby,et al.  Inflammation and cellular immune responses in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2006, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[11]  Jay D Humphrey,et al.  Quantification of the mechanical behavior of carotid arteries from wild-type, dystrophin-deficient, and sarcoglycan-delta knockout mice. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  On constitutive descriptors of the biaxial mechanical behaviour of human abdominal aorta and aneurysms , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  U. Mahmood,et al.  In vivo optical molecular imaging of matrix metalloproteinase activity in abdominal aortic aneurysms correlates with treatment effects on growth rate. , 2010, Atherosclerosis.

[14]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Regional Atherosclerotic Plaque Properties in ApoE–/– Mice Quantified by Atomic Force, Immunofluorescence, and Light Microscopy , 2011, Journal of Vascular Research.

[15]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  In vivo quantification of murine aortic cyclic strain, motion, and curvature: Implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm growth , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Genetically engineered resistance for MMP collagenases promotes abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in mice infused with angiotensin II , 2009, Laboratory Investigation.

[17]  D. F. Bunce Atlas of Arterial Histology , 1974 .

[18]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Pathophysiology of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  M. Epstein,et al.  Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs , 2002 .

[21]  Alan Daugherty,et al.  Mouse Models of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2004, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[22]  A. Daugherty,et al.  Aortic Dissection Precedes Formation of Aneurysms and Atherosclerosis in Angiotensin II-Infused, Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice , 2003, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[23]  R. Charnigo,et al.  ANG II infusion promotes abdominal aortic aneurysms independent of increased blood pressure in hypercholesterolemic mice. , 2009, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[24]  G. Kassab,et al.  Variation of mechanical properties along the length of the aorta in C57bl/6 mice. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[25]  Monica M Dua,et al.  Hemodynamic influences on abdominal aortic aneurysm disease: Application of biomechanics to aneurysm pathophysiology. , 2010, Vascular pharmacology.

[26]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Altered biomechanical properties of carotid arteries in two mouse models of muscular dystrophy. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  R. Ross,et al.  ApoE-deficient mice develop lesions of all phases of atherosclerosis throughout the arterial tree. , 1994, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.