Sex Differences in Medical Care and Early Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background— Women receive less evidence-based medical care than men and have higher rates of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unclear whether efforts undertaken to improve AMI care have mitigated these sex disparities in the current era. Methods and Results— Using the Get With the Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease database, we examined sex differences in care processes and in-hospital death among 78 254 patients with AMI in 420 US hospitals from 2001 to 2006. Women were older, had more comorbidities, less often presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and had higher unadjusted in-hospital death (8.2% versus 5.7%; P<0.0001) than men. After multivariable adjustment, sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates were no longer observed in the overall AMI cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.04; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.10) but persisted among STEMI patients (10.2% versus 5.5%; P<0.0001; adjusted OR=1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23). Compared with men, women were less likely to receive early aspirin treatment (adjusted OR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.90), early &bgr;-blocker treatment (adjusted OR=0.90; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93), reperfusion therapy (adjusted OR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.80), or timely reperfusion (door-to-needle time ≤30 minutes: adjusted OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; door-to-balloon time ≤90 minutes: adjusted OR=0.87; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95). Women also experienced lower use of cardiac catheterization and revascularization procedures after AMI. Conclusions— Overall, no sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates after AMI were observed after multivariable adjustment. However, women with STEMI had higher adjusted mortality rates than men. The underuse of evidence-based treatments and delayed reperfusion among women represent potential opportunities for reducing sex disparities in care and outcome after AMI.

[1]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[2]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patie , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  C. Pepine,et al.  Gender differences in the treatment for acute myocardial infarction: bias or biology? , 2007, Circulation.

[4]  I. Durand-zaleski,et al.  Gender Differences in Hospital Mortality and Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Microsimulation Analysis of the 1999 Nationwide French Hospitals Database , 2007, Circulation.

[5]  Yuling Hong,et al.  Overview of the American Heart Association "Get with the Guidelines" programs: coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. , 2006, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[6]  N. Danchin,et al.  Impact of age and gender on in-hospital and late mortality after acute myocardial infarction: increased early risk in younger women: results from the French nation-wide USIC registries. , 2006, European heart journal.

[7]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA clinical performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures on ST-Elevation and Non-ST-El , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Get with the guidelines for cardiovascular secondary prevention: pilot results. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Using "get with the guidelines" to improve cardiovascular secondary prevention. , 2003, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[12]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Race and sex differences in the refusal of cardiac catheterization among elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, American heart journal.

[13]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  J. Pell,et al.  Gender and survival: a population-based study of 201,114 men and women following a first acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Coronary artery disease in women: different, often undertreated. , 2001, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Timmis,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction in women: contribution of treatment variables to adverse outcome. , 2000, American heart journal.

[17]  H. Lawson,et al.  Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  K. Labresh,et al.  Get with the guidelines. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[19]  J. Pell,et al.  Sex differences in outcome following community-based cardiopulmonary arrest. , 2000, European heart journal.

[20]  F Van de Werf,et al.  Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  M. Nettleman,et al.  Comparison of the early outcome of acute myocardial infarction in women and men. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. , 1998, Circulation.

[23]  R. Collins,et al.  A comparison of the early outcome of acute myocardial infarction in women and men. The Third International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Erik Sundeil Incidence and predictors of bleeding after contemporary thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction , 1997 .

[25]  A. Folsom,et al.  Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  R. Califf,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Bleeding After Contemporary Thrombolytic Therapy for Myocardial Infarction , 1997 .

[27]  R. Califf,et al.  Comparisons of Characteristics and Outcomes Among Women and Men with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Thrombolytic Therapy , 1997 .

[28]  L. Chambless,et al.  Sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for an increased risk for women? , 1995, Circulation.

[29]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction. Is there evidence for an increased risk for women? , 1995, Circulation.

[30]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.