Impact of different interaction protocols on group communication, satisfaction and learning outcomes of primary school children when using multitouch tabletops

Abstract Using information and communication technology (ICT) in childhood education is becoming more relevant as research shows that it can be used to foster children's academic and non-academic skills. ICT can help build environments where children can communicate and collaborate, but creating effective learning environments is not trivial. It is thus necessary to study which configuration is the most appropriate for encouraging collaboration. In this work, we present how two different ways of interacting with a multitouch tabletop, taking turns without having to agree on the answer and working simultaneously but having to agree on the answer, affect group communication and children's satisfaction. We have carried out four different learning experiments involving 180 children between 6 and 11 years of age who had to solve math problems in groups of three and four at a multitouch tabletop. Our results suggest that turn-based interaction makes students communicate more with each other when solving activities in groups. In addition, children's satisfaction is high when they perform activities at a multitouch tabletop, but learning outcomes seems to not be impacted by the way of interacting with the device. Thus, while multitouch tabletops can be used to create collaborative learning environments, it is the way in which students interact with the device that may impact group communication.

[1]  Charles K. Fadel,et al.  21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times , 2009 .

[2]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  SIDES: A Cooperative Tabletop Computer Game for Social Skills Development , 2022 .

[3]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[4]  Jenni Ingram,et al.  Turn taking and ‘wait time’ in classroom interactions , 2014 .

[5]  Danaë Emma Beckford Stanton Fraser,et al.  The effects of multiple mice on children's talk and interaction , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Exploring How a Co-dependent Tangible Tool Design Supports Collaboration in a Tabletop Activity , 2014, GROUP.

[7]  Wu-Yuin Hwang,et al.  Exploring Effects of Multi-Touch Tabletop on Collaborative Fraction Learning and the Relationship of Learning Behavior and Interaction with Learning Achievement , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Ingrid García Torres,et al.  ICT in Structured Programming Learning through Constructivist Techniques for Education , 2018 .

[9]  B. Maroni Pauses, gaps and wait time in classroom interaction in primary schools , 2011 .

[10]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  Logistics and interdepartmental integration , 1996 .

[11]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  Creating a Conducive Learning Environment for the Effective Integration of ICT: Classroom Management Issues , 2003 .

[12]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives , 2005, CHI.

[13]  Emma Mercier,et al.  Multi-touch tables and collaborative learning , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface , 2011, CHI.

[15]  Michail Kalogiannakis,et al.  Educational apps from the Android Google Play for Greek preschoolers: A systematic review , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[16]  H. Laerhoven,et al.  A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnaires , 2004, Acta paediatrica.

[17]  Gary Charness,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 2022 .

[18]  Christine Stephen,et al.  Pre-school children creating and communicating with digital technologies in the home , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  A. Gokhale Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[20]  Mary Budd Rowe,et al.  Relation of wait-time and rewards to the development of language, logic, and fate control: Part II-Rewards , 1974 .

[21]  Afke Donker,et al.  Aiming and clicking in young children's use of the computer mouse , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Daniel Churchill,et al.  Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[23]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Beyond one-size-fits-all: how interactive tabletops support collaborative learning , 2011, IDC.

[24]  Pablo A. Haya,et al.  Benefits of Combining Multitouch Tabletops and Turn-Based Collaborative Learning Activities for People with Cognitive Disabilities and People with ASD , 2014, 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[25]  Pablo A. Haya,et al.  Impact of using interactive devices in Spanish early childhood education public schools , 2019, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[26]  Amy Hutchison,et al.  iPads as a Literacy Teaching Tool in Early Childhood. , 2013 .

[27]  Stephanie Bell Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future , 2010 .

[28]  Margaret B Row Wait-Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables, Their Influence on Language, Logic, and Fate Control: Part One--Wait-Time. , 1974 .

[29]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Designing interaction in digital tabletop games to support collaborative learning in children , 2014, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[30]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[31]  Wei Shou,et al.  Interaction design patterns for multi-touch tabletop collaborative games , 2012, CHI EA '12.

[32]  Karl Magnus Petersson,et al.  The impact of reading and writing skills on a visuo-motor integration task: A comparison between illiterate and literate subjects , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[33]  A. C. Kruger Peer collaboration: conflict, cooperation, or both? , 1993 .

[34]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Collaborating around Digital Tabletops , 2017, CHI 2018.

[35]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table , 2009, ITS '09.

[36]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[37]  E. Arntzen,et al.  On the utility of within-participant research design when working with patients with neurocognitive disorders , 2015, Clinical interventions in aging.

[38]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Designing Learning Experiences within Learners' Zones of Proximal Development (ZPDs): Enabling Collaborative Learning On-Site and Online , 2003, J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[40]  Javier Jaén Martínez,et al.  Exploring tabletops as an effective tool to foster creativity traits , 2012, TEI.

[41]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Technology and School Change New Lamps for Old , 1995 .

[42]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: INTRODUCTION TO MULTIMEDIA LEARNING , 2009 .

[43]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Learning to collaborate: Designing collaboration in a 3-D game environment , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[44]  Z. Dörnyei Psychological Processes in Cooperative Language Learning: Group Dynamics and Motivation. , 1997 .

[45]  Robert L. Leahy,et al.  The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[46]  Pablo A. Haya,et al.  DEDOS: An Authoring Toolkit to Create Educational Multimedia Activities for Multiple Devices , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[47]  Craig Thorley,et al.  Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure , 2007 .

[48]  Steven R. Banks,et al.  Young Children's Initial Exploration of Computers. , 2000 .

[49]  Allison Druin,et al.  The design of children's technology , 1998 .

[50]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Around the table: are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions? , 2009, CSCL.