Cremated human remains: is measurement of the lateral angle of the meatus acusticus internus a reliable method of sex determination?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lateral angle (LA) method—based on the measurement of the angle at which the internal acoustic canal opens up to the surface of the petrous bone—for sex determination in cremated skeletal remains of Italians. The sample consisted of 160 adult individuals of known age and sex who had recently died and were cremated in the crematorium of Ferrara (northern Italy). Several studies have demonstrated that the petrous portion of the temporal bone may be a valuable tool for sex diagnosis in unburned skeletal remains. Since petrous bones are usually preserved after cremation, this method could be of particular interest in the case of burned skeletal remains. The repeatability of intra- and inter-observer measurements was good. The results indicated that male and female lateral angles were significantly different but that the values did not differ among age-groups. There was no bilateral difference in LA. However, neither the 45° angle, proposed in earlier studies as the sectioning point for this variable from male and female data distributions, nor another angular value allowed satisfactory discrimination between the sexes in our sample. The influence of the “age” factor (about 82 % of females were of ≥75 years of age) on the results is critically discussed. The results of this study suggest that the LA method is not sufficiently reliable to assess the sex of elderly Italian individuals from their burned remains and thus should only be used in conjunction with other sexing techniques.

[1]  S. Fairgrieve,et al.  Forensic Cremation Recovery and Analysis , 2007 .

[2]  R. Tague Maternal mortality or prolonged growth: age at death and pelvic size in three prehistoric Amerindian populations. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  J. Wahl,et al.  Metric sex differentiation of the pars petrosa ossis temporalis , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[4]  F Introna,et al.  Sex determination by discriminant analysis of patella measurements. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[5]  E. Gualdi-Russo Sex determination from the talus and calcaneus measurements. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[6]  M Katherine Spradley,et al.  Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Skull Versus Postcranial Elements , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  M. Graw,et al.  “Lateral Angle” of the Internal Auditory Canal: Non‐Association with Temporal Bone Pneumatization , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  A. Malgosa,et al.  Sex assessment on the basis of long bone circumference. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  D. Ferembach,et al.  Recommendation for Age and Sex Diagnoses of Skeletons , 1980 .

[10]  P. James Macaluso,et al.  Sex discrimination from the glenoid cavity in black South Africans: morphometric analysis of digital photographs , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[11]  René Gapert,et al.  Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample , 2008, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[12]  Phillip L Walker,et al.  Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  J. Wahl Ein Beitrag zur metrischen Geschlechtsdiagnose verbrannter und unverbrannter menschlicher Knochenreste—ausgearbeitet an der Pars petrosa ossis temporalis , 1981, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[14]  W. M. Krogman The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[15]  Emanuela Gualdi,et al.  Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population , 1998 .

[16]  S. Hummel,et al.  Trace element studies on experimentally cremated bone. I. Alteration of the chemical composition at high temperatures , 1991 .

[17]  E. Kranioti,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism of the Humerus in Contemporary Cretans—A Population‐Specific Study and a Review of the Literature * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  M Steyn,et al.  Osteometric sex determination from the pelvis--does population specificity matter? , 2009, Forensic science international.

[19]  Elena F. Kranioti,et al.  Sex estimation of the Cretan humerus: a digital radiometric study , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[20]  E. Higgs,et al.  Science In Archaeology , 1963 .

[21]  J. Wahl,et al.  Course of the meatus acusticus internus as criterion for sex differentiation. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[22]  S. Symes,et al.  The analysis of burned human remains , 2008 .

[23]  J. Kalmey,et al.  Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the petrous portion of the temporal bone. , 1996, Journal of forensic sciences.

[24]  P. Macaluso,et al.  Test of a new components method for age-at-death estimation from the medial end of the fourth rib using a modern Spanish sample , 2012, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[25]  M. Schoeninger,et al.  Burnt bones and teeth: an experimental study of color, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage , 1984 .

[26]  J. Abbas,et al.  Hyperostosis frontalis interna: criteria for sexing and aging a skeleton , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[27]  D. Gonçalves The reliability of osteometric techniques for the sex determination of burned human skeletal remains. , 2011, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[28]  N. Lynnerup,et al.  Lateral angle: a method for sexing using the petrous bone. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  A. Ewis,et al.  Estimation of sex of Egyptian population by 3D computerized tomography of the pars petrosa ossis temporalis , 2012 .