Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001.

The prescribed dose of anticancer agents is most commonly calculated using body surface area as the only independent variable, and it has been shown that this approach still results in large interpatient variability in drug exposure. Here, we retrospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics of 33 investigational agents tested in phase I trials from 1991 through 2001, as a function of body surface area in 1650 adult cancer patients. Twelve of the drugs were administered orally, 19 were administered intravenously, and two were administered by both routes. Body surface area-based dosing was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in interpatient variability in drug clearance for only five of the 33 agents: docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil/eniluracil, paclitaxel, temozolomide, and troxacitabine. These results do not support the use of body surface area in dose calculations and suggest that alternate dosing strategies should be evaluated. We conclude that body surface area should not be used to determine starting doses of investigational agents in future phase I studies.

[1]  M. Gore,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetic and Dynamic Analysis of the Topoisomerase I Inhibitor Lurtotecan in Phase II Studies , 2002, Investigational New Drugs.

[2]  Mark J. Ratain,et al.  Body Surface Area as a Determinant of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Dosing , 2001, Investigational New Drugs.

[3]  J. Verweij,et al.  Disposition of docetaxel in the presence of P-glycoprotein inhibition by intravenous administration of R101933. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[4]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral ZD9331, a novel nonpolyglutamated thymidylate synthase inhibitor, in adult patients with solid tumors. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  H. Groen,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of liposomal lurtotecan, NX 211: urinary excretion predicts hematologic toxicity. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I pharmacokinetic and sequence finding study of the combination of docetaxel and methotrexate in patients with solid tumours. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[7]  M. Ratain,et al.  Update on pharmacogenetics in cancer chemotherapy. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[8]  J. Verweij,et al.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of unbound paclitaxel during 1- and 3-hour infusions. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Verweij,et al.  Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Troxacitabine, an L-stereoisomeric nucleoside analog, on a five-times-daily schedule: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study in patients with advanced solid malignancies. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  A. Calvert,et al.  Carboplatin dosing formulae: gender bias and the use of creatinine-based methodologies. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[12]  Mary V. Relling,et al.  Pharmacogenetics and cancer therapy , 2001, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  M O Karlsson,et al.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model for paclitaxel. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Verweij,et al.  The (ir)relevance of plasma protein binding of anticancer drugs. , 2001, The Netherlands journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Verweij,et al.  Dose and schedule-finding study of oral topotecan and weekly cisplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  J. Verweij,et al.  Body-surface area-based dosing does not increase accuracy of predicting cisplatin exposure. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  L. Grochow,et al.  A phase I dose escalation and bioavailability study of oral sodium phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumor malignancies. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[18]  J. Schellens Population pharmacokinetics and dynamics in phase II studies of the novel bioreductive alkylating cytotoxic indoloquinone EO9 , 2001, Anti-cancer drugs.

[19]  F. D. De Braud,et al.  Pharmacogenetic determinants of anti-cancer drug activity and toxicity. , 2001, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[20]  A. Harris,et al.  Phase I and pharmacological study of the oral matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, MMI270 (CGS27023A), in patients with advanced solid cancer. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[21]  J. Verweij,et al.  Modulation of irinotecan-induced diarrhea by cotreatment with neomycin in cancer patients. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[22]  M. Piccart,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 given twice daily to patients with advanced solid tumors. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  W. Evans,et al.  Pharmacogenomics: unlocking the human genome for better drug therapy. , 2001, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[24]  S. Poole,et al.  Poor correlation between body surface area and glomerular filtration rate , 2000, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[25]  L. Grochow,et al.  A phase I and pharmacologic evaluation of the DNA intercalator CI-958 in patients with advanced solid tumors. , 2000, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I and pharmacological study of increased dose oral topotecan in combination with intravenous cisplatin. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  J. Verweij,et al.  Inter- and intrapatient variability in oral topotecan pharmacokinetics: implications for body-surface area dosage regimens. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[28]  B. Reigner,et al.  A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the combination of capecitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  J. Verweij,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of 2′-Deoxy-2′-Methylidenecytidine (DMDC), a Deoxycytidine Analogue Antineoplastic Agent , 2000, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[30]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I pharmacologic study of oral topotecan and intravenous cisplatin: sequence-dependent hematologic side effects. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  J. Wanders,et al.  Phase I and pharmacological study of weekly administration of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM 486A (CGP 48 664) in patients with solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[32]  J. Verweij,et al.  The orally administered P-glycoprotein inhibitor R101933 does not alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[33]  L. Grochow,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral fluorouracil on a chronic daily schedule in combination with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator eniluracil. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  A. Harris,et al.  Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral MMI270B (CGS 27023A), a novel matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[35]  H. Groen,et al.  A prolonged methoxymorpholino doxorubicin (PNU-152243 or MMRDX) infusion schedule in patients with solid tumours: a phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[36]  J. Ledermann,et al.  The polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM486A in combination with 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): results of a phase I and pharmacokinetic study , 2000 .

[37]  J. Verweij,et al.  Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Suzanne F. Jones,et al.  A phase I evaluation of multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514), administered every 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation , 1999, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[39]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of BMS-181174 given as a 6 h infusion every 4 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors. , 1999, Anti-cancer drugs.

[40]  G. Weiss,et al.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide on a daily-for-5-days schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral (PEG-1000) 9-aminocamptothecin in adult patients with solid tumors. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  Alex Sparreboom,et al.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of encapsulated oral 9‐aminocamptothecin in plasma and saliva , 1999, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[43]  J Verweij,et al.  Cremophor EL-mediated alteration of paclitaxel distribution in human blood: clinical pharmacokinetic implications. , 1999, Cancer research.

[44]  J. Verweij,et al.  Disposition of Cremophor EL in humans limits the potential for modulation of the multidrug resistance phenotype in vivo. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[45]  J. Verweij,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of oral 9-aminocamptothecin capsules in adult patients with solid tumors. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[46]  E. Sausville,et al.  Unpredicted clinical pharmacology of UCN-01 caused by specific binding to human alpha1-acid glycoprotein. , 1998, Cancer research.

[47]  M. Ratain Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: science, myth, or habit? , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  J. Verweij,et al.  Five days of oral topotecan (Hycamtin), a phase I and pharmacological study in adult patients with solid tumours. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[49]  J. Verweij,et al.  Oral topotecan given once or twice daily for ten days: a phase I pharmacology study in adult patients with solid tumors. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[50]  M. Piccart,et al.  A clinical pharmacokinetics study of carzelesin given by short-term intravenous infusion in a phase I study , 1998, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[51]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral topotecan administered twice daily for 21 days to adult patients with solid tumors. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  L. Grochow,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[53]  L. Grochow,et al.  Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  H. Gurney,et al.  Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  L. Grochow,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic studies of topotecan in patients with impaired hepatic function. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[56]  J. Verweij,et al.  Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral topotecan: a new topoisomerase I inhibitor. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[57]  L. Grochow,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[58]  J. Verweij,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of the novel indoloquinone bioreductive alkylating cytotoxic drug E09. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[59]  L. Grochow,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[60]  L. Grochow,et al.  Is dose normalization to weight or body surface area useful in adults? , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[61]  E. Wolner,et al.  [On a simple relation between blood volume and body surface area]. , 1968, Zeitschrift fur Kreislaufforschung.

[62]  K. Meyer,et al.  The use of surface area as a basis for establishing normal blood volume. , 1957, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[63]  Homer W. Smith The Kidney: Structure and Function in Health and Disease , 1952 .