Osseointegration of hollow porous titanium prostheses loaded with cancellous bone matrix in rabbits

This study aimed to observe the osseointegration of hollow porous titanium prostheses (HPTP) loaded with cancellous bone matrix (CBM) in rabbits using histological and biomechanical perspectives. Experimental samples were implanted into the lateral femoral condyles of 66 New Zealand rabbits, allocated into the following groups: non-porous prosthesis group (Group A, n=22); HPTP group (Group B, n=22); HPTP+CBM group (Group C, n=22). The rabbits were sacrificed at 3, 8 and 12 weeks, postoperatively. X-ray analyses, microscopy techniques and morphological measurement software and mechanical tests were used for evaluation. At each time point, the tissues surrounding the implants were similar in all of the groups, with bony in-growth into the 2-mm round holes observed for the defects in Groups B and C. However, the internal bone formation was significantly better in Group C than in Group B at different time points (P<0.01). Biomechanically, the pull-out forces were significantly greater in Groups B and C than in Group A (P<0.01), with no difference between Groups B and C (P>0.05). These results suggest that bone can grow into the cavities of HPTP to achieve more stable locking fixation, and those osteogenic materials, such as CBM, can enhance osteogenesis to achieve better osseointegration between the implant and the host bone.

[1]  Wayne G. Paprosky,et al.  Cementless Femoral Design Concerns: Rationale for Extensive Porous Coating , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Pekka Pulkkinen,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A. Rastogi,et al.  Incorporation and biodegradation of hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate implanted in large metaphyseal defects--an animal study. , 2008, Indian journal of experimental biology.

[4]  Y. Ikada,et al.  Significance of interstitial bone ingrowth under load-bearing conditions: a comparison between solid and porous implant materials. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[5]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[6]  W. Harris,et al.  A review of current cross-linked polyethylenes used in total joint arthroplasty. , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Dual hydroxyapatite composite with porous and solid parts: experimental study using canine lumbar interbody fusion model. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[8]  E. Morscher Failures and Successes in Total HIP Replacement-Why Good Ideas May Not Work , 2003, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[9]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  A bionic artificial joint system and investigation of tribological performance , 2009 .

[10]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Macro-structural effect of metal surfaces treated using computer-assisted yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser scanning on bone-implant fixation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  J. Lang,et al.  Use of ceramics in total hip replacement. , 2008, Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances.

[12]  P. Hardouin,et al.  Evaluation of the osteogenesis and biodegradation of porous biphasic ceramic in the human spine. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[13]  P. Revell,et al.  The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  L. Havelin,et al.  Risk factors for revision after shoulder arthroplasty , 2009, Acta orthopaedica.

[15]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Proximally porous-coated ingrowth prostheses: limits of use. , 1999, Orthopedics.

[16]  Tadashi Kokubo,et al.  Mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of porous bioactive titanium. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[17]  T. Bauer,et al.  The pathology of total joint arthroplasty.II. Mechanisms of implant failure. , 1999, Skeletal radiology.

[18]  S. Jacobsen,et al.  Good performance of a titanium femoral component in cementless hip arthroplasty in younger patients97 arthroplasties followed for 5-11 years , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[19]  L. Pruitt,et al.  In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  M. Jacobsson,et al.  Recurrent bone regeneration in titanium implants. Experimental model for determining the healing capacity of bone using quantitative microradiography. , 1988, Biomaterials.

[21]  G. Beaupré,et al.  Osseointegration of total hip arthroplasties: studies in humans and animals. , 1999, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[22]  D. Ayala,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the resorption and osteoconduction of a macroporous calcium phosphate bone cement for the repair of a critical size defect in the femoral condyle. , 2009, Veterinary journal.

[23]  Y. Konttinen,et al.  Biocompatibility of total joint replacements: A review. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[24]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Numerical surface characterization of wear debris from artificial joints using atomic force microscopy , 2009 .

[25]  T. Brown,et al.  What design factors influence wear behavior at the bearing surfaces in total joint replacements? , 2008, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[26]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  Orthopedic coating materials: considerations and applications , 2009, Expert review of medical devices.

[27]  A. Rothwell,et al.  Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  M. Yanagita BMP modulators regulate the function of BMP during body patterning and disease progression , 2009, BioFactors.

[29]  Craig L Duvall,et al.  3D imaging of tissue integration with porous biomaterials. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[30]  Joshua J Jacobs,et al.  Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[31]  N. Mahomed,et al.  Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  W. Mutschler,et al.  Tissue engineering for bone defect healing: an update on a multi-component approach. , 2008, Injury.

[33]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[34]  K. Leong,et al.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[35]  A. Gosain,et al.  Biomaterials in the face: benefits and risks. , 1999, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[36]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium on the bone-implant interface shear strength. , 1994, Biomaterials.

[37]  T. Bauer,et al.  The pathology of total joint arthroplasty , 1999, Skeletal Radiology.

[38]  C J H Veillette,et al.  Revision of the humeral component for aseptic loosening in arthroplasty of the shoulder. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[39]  S. Santavirta,et al.  Potential of coatings in total hip replacement. , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  Peter Thomsen,et al.  Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: A review of different theories , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.