Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context

This study presents two extensions to the two‐stage expectation‐confirmation theory of information systems (IS) continuance. First, we expand the belief set from perceived usefulness in the original IS continuance model to include three additional predictors identified in the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, namely effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions. Second, we ground the IS continuance model in the context of transactional systems that involve transmission of personal and sensitive information and include trust as a key contextual belief in the model. To test the expanded IS continuance model, we conducted a longitudinal field study of 3159 Hong Kong citizens across two electronic government (e‐government) technologies that enable citizens' access to government services. In general, the results support the expanded model that provides a rich understanding of the changes in the pre‐usage beliefs and attitudes through the emergent constructs of disconfirmation and satisfaction, ultimately influencing IS continuance intention. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the expanded model.

[1]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Acceptance with Peer Support: A Social Network Perspective to Understand Employees' System Use , 2009, MIS Q..

[2]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[4]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Expectation Confirmation in Technology Use , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[7]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  E XPECTATION D ISCONFIRMATION AND T ECHNOLOGY A DOPTION : P OLYNOMIAL M ODELING AND R ESPONSE S URFACE A NALYSIS 1 , 2010 .

[8]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[9]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Understanding the Service Component of Application Service Provision: An Empirical Analysis of Satisfaction with ASP Services , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Explaining information technology usage: A test of competing models☆ , 2008 .

[11]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[12]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Joeson Wong Ka Yu.  Electronic government and its implication for data privacy in Hong Kong: Can Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance protect the privacy of personal information in cyberspace? , 2005 .

[14]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[16]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 1957 .

[17]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[19]  Kenneth Christopher.  UNDERSTANDING LARGE-SCALE IT PROJECT FAILURE: ESCALATING AND DE-ESCALATING COMMITMENT , 2005 .

[20]  VenkateshViswanath.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use , 2000 .

[21]  Yi-Shun Wang.  Assessing e‐commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[23]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[24]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why software projects escalate: the importance of project management constructs , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[25]  H. Kelman.  Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[26]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges , 2001, MIS Q..

[27]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[28]  R. Oliver.  Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. , 1981 .

[29]  Michael J. Ryan.  Behavioral intention formation : the interdependency of attitudinal and social influence variables , 1982 .

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Total Quality Management in Information Systems Development: Key Constructs and Relationships , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  RaiArun,et al.  Measuring Firm Performance at the Network Level , 2004 .

[33]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring Firm Performance at the Network Level: A Nomology of the Business Impact of Digital Supply Networks , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Zeynep Özata,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries , 2013 .

[37]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[38]  R. Oliver.  A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[39]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[41]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[42]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies , 2005 .

[44]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  G. Johns.  The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[46]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[47]  R. Bagozzi.  The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions, and behavior , 1992 .

[48]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding Continued Information Technology Usage Behavior: A Comparison of Three Models in the Context of Mobile Internet , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[52]  J. E. Sheridan,et al.  Structural model of leadership influence in a hospital organization. , 1979, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[53]  James Y. L. Thong,et al.  An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Interpreting Dimensions of Consumer Trust in E-Commerce , 2003, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[55]  Shan Wang,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Electronic Marketplace Adoption: A Multiple Perspective View , 2006, Electron. Mark..

[56]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[57]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  Group Polarization and Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Communication Cues, Social Presence, and Anonymity , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Jong-Weon Kim,et al.  Securing E-Government Services , 2006, Computer.

[61]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[62]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[63]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[64]  Hengdong Yang,et al.  The Role of Personality Traits in UTAUT Model under Online Stocking , 2005 .

[65]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  Jeffrey L. Bradach,et al.  Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms , 1989 .

[67]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[68]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[69]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[70]  GosainSanjay,et al.  Model of acceptance with peer support , 2009 .

[71]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters , 2000 .

[72]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development , 2007 .

[73]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.