A multi-resolution global land cover dataset through multisource data aggregation

Recent developments of 30 m global land characterization datasets (e.g., land cover, vegetation continues field) represent the finest spatial resolution inputs for global scale studies. Here, we present results from further improvement to land cover mapping and impact analysis of spatial resolution on area estimation for different land cover types. We proposed a set of methods to aggregate two existing 30 m resolution circa 2010 global land cover maps, namely FROM-GLC (Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring-Global Land Cover) and FROM-GLC-seg (Segmentation), with two coarser resolution global maps on development, i.e., Nighttime Light Impervious Surface Area (NL-ISA) and MODIS urban extent (MODIS-urban), to produce an improved 30 m global land cover map—FROM-GLC-agg (Aggregation). It was post-processed using additional coarse resolution datasets (i.e., MCD12Q1, GlobCover2009, MOD44W etc.) to reduce land cover type confusion. Around 98.9% pixels remain 30 m resolution after some post-processing to this dataset. Based on this map, majority aggregation and proportion aggregation approaches were employed to create a multi-resolution hierarchy (i.e., 250 m, 500 m, 1 km, 5 km, 10 km, 25 km, 50 km, 100 km) of land cover maps to meet requirements for different resolutions from different applications. Through accuracy assessment, we found that the best overall accuracies for the post-processed base map (at 30 m) and the three maps subsequently aggregated at 250 m, 500 m, 1 km resolutions are 69.50%, 76.65%, 74.65%, and 73.47%, respectively. Our analysis of area-estimation biases for different land cover types at different resolutions suggests that maps at coarser than 5 km resolution contain at least 5% area estimation error for most land cover types. Proportion layers, which contain precise information on land cover percentage, are suggested for use when coarser resolution land cover data are required.

[1]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Predicting across scales: Theory development and testing , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[3]  J. Townshend,et al.  NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale , 1994 .

[4]  Nicholas A. S. Hamm,et al.  Analysing the effect of different aggregation approaches on remotely sensed data , 2013 .

[5]  M. Herold,et al.  Revisiting land cover observation to address the needs of the climate modeling community , 2011 .

[6]  Qiong Ran,et al.  Settlement extraction in the North China Plain using Landsat and Beijing-1 multispectral data with an improved watershed segmentation algorithm , 2010 .

[7]  Andy Jarvis,et al.  Downscaling Global Circulation Model Outputs: The Delta Method Decision and Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 1 , 2010 .

[8]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[9]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[10]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[11]  C. Small,et al.  A global analysis of urban reflectance , 2005 .

[12]  W. Mauser,et al.  Modelling the spatial distribution of evapotranspiration on different scales using remote sensing data , 1998 .

[13]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Harmonizing and Combining Existing Land Cover/Land Use Datasets for Cropland Area Monitoring at the African Continental Scale , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[14]  M. Friedl,et al.  Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500-m data: new methods and datasets based on 'urban ecoregions'. , 2010 .

[15]  Le Yu,et al.  Mapping global land cover in 2001 and 2010 with spatial-temporal consistency at 250 m resolution , 2015 .

[16]  U. Kitron,et al.  Upscale or downscale: applications of fine scale remotely sensed data to Chagas disease in Argentina and schistosomiasis in Kenya. , 2006, Geospatial health.

[17]  Ryutaro Tateishi,et al.  Production of global land cover data – GLCNMO , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[18]  Le Yu,et al.  FROM-GC: 30 m global cropland extent derived through multisource data integration , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[19]  Martin Jung,et al.  Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling , 2006 .

[20]  Aaron Moody,et al.  The influence of scale and the spatial characteristics of landscapes on land-cover mapping using remote sensing , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  Le Yu,et al.  Improving 30 m global land-cover map FROM-GLC with time series MODIS and auxiliary data sets: a segmentation-based approach , 2013 .

[22]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[23]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Cropland for sub‐Saharan Africa: A synergistic approach using five land cover data sets , 2011 .

[24]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[25]  Peng Gong,et al.  Suitability mapping of global wetland areas and validation with remotely sensed data , 2014, Science China Earth Sciences.

[26]  Jeffrey G. Masek,et al.  Large Area Scene Selection Interface (LASSI): Methodology of Selecting Landsat Imagery for the Global Land Survey 2005. , 2009 .

[27]  R. Nemani,et al.  Global Distribution and Density of Constructed Impervious Surfaces , 2007, Sensors.

[28]  M. Friedl,et al.  A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data , 2009 .

[29]  A. Henderson‐sellers,et al.  A global archive of land cover and soils data for use in general circulation climate models , 1985 .

[30]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[31]  Aaron Moody,et al.  Scale-dependent errors in the estimation of land-cover proportions. Implications for global land-cover datasets , 1994 .

[32]  Kathleen Neumann,et al.  Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies , 2011 .

[33]  Yang Liu,et al.  Combining Spatial-Temporal and Phylogenetic Analysis Approaches for Improved Understanding on Global H5N1 Transmission , 2010, PloS one.

[34]  P. Gong,et al.  Phenology-based Crop Classification Algorithm and its Implications on Agricultural Water Use Assessments in California’s Central Valley , 2012 .

[35]  Zhengpeng Li,et al.  A spatial resolution threshold of land cover in estimating terrestrial carbon sequestration in four counties in Georgia and Alabama, USA , 2010 .

[36]  Hong S. He,et al.  Effects of spatial aggregation approaches on classified satellite imagery , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[37]  Frédéric Achard,et al.  GLOBCOVER : The most detailed portrait of Earth , 2008 .

[38]  P. Gong,et al.  The use of structural information for improving land-cover classification accuracies at the rural-urban fringe. , 1990 .

[39]  Guoqin Zhang,et al.  Urbanization and health in China, thinking at the national, local and individual levels , 2016, Environmental Health.

[40]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classi(cid:142) cation at 1 km spatial resolution using a classi(cid:142) cation tree approach , 2004 .

[41]  Philip J. Howarth,et al.  Land-use classification of SPOT HRV data using a cover-frequency method , 1992 .

[42]  P. Gong,et al.  Frequency-based contextual classification and gray-level vector reduction for land-use identification , 1992 .

[43]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Remote Sensing of Urban/Suburban Infrastructure and Socio‐Economic Attributes , 2011 .

[44]  T. Wigley,et al.  Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations , 1997 .

[45]  A. Ducharne,et al.  Comprehensive data set of global land cover change for land surface model applications , 2008 .

[46]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC 2000 : a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[47]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  David P. Roy,et al.  The Global Availability of Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+ Land Surface Observations and Implications for Global 30m Landsat Data Product Generation , 2013 .

[49]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS , 2023 .

[50]  R. Gardner,et al.  A new approach for rescaling land cover data , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[51]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  A global, self‐consistent, hierarchical, high‐resolution shoreline database , 1996 .

[52]  Hankui K. Zhang,et al.  Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data , 2013 .

[53]  R. K. Gupta,et al.  Problems in upscaling of high resolution remote sensing data to coarse spatial resolution over land surface , 2000 .

[54]  P. Gong,et al.  Efficient corn and soybean mapping with temporal extendability: A multi-year experiment using Landsat imagery , 2014 .

[55]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets , 2010 .

[56]  Lu Liang,et al.  China’s urban expansion from 1990 to 2010 determined with satellite remote sensing , 2012 .

[57]  Le Yu,et al.  Towards the automatic selection of optimal seam line locations when merging optical remote-sensing images , 2012 .