Airborne Geophysics – Evolution and Revolution

The past decade (1997-2007) of airborne geophysics has been an exciting time. Mineral exploration activity and expenditures have been cyclical, but the decade has ended in what can only be referred to as “boom times”. The airborne survey industry itself has undergone dramatic changes, moving into a period of consolidation during 1999/2001, only to be followed by a period of expansion with new companies being formed and prospering. At the present time there are more independent commercial airborne survey companies operating than before the consolidation. The client base has also been altered significantly. The trend to “buying reserves” instead of “finding them” has resulted in a series of mergers and acquisitions amongst the major mining companies. Fortunately the buoyant financial markets and recent strong commodity prices have allowed the “juniors” to take up the slack and in many cases finance exploration joint ventures with the majors. A cloud on the horizon is the aging and declining pool of experienced people in the industry. Against this background of market dynamics some airborne geophysical methods such as radiometrics and magnetics have experienced incremental, basically evolutionary developments over the decade. One exception to this is the trend towards low level high resolution magnetic surveys employing helicopters and “crop duster” aircraft. Another would be the introduction of UAV’s for magnetic surveys although the importance of this survey technology remains to be proven. Much more dramatic developments, or a revolution, have occurred in gravity and electromagnetics. In gravity there have been significant new developments in the measurement of basic airborne gravity. However, the most significant development for mining applications has been the introduction of airborne systems to measure gravity gradients, termed airborne gravity gradiometers (AGG). Airborne electromagnetic developments present a bit of a paradox. In both helicopter and fixed wing frequency domain systems developments have been incremental and primarily focused on new applications. The true revolution has occurred in the development and application of helicopter time domain (HTEM) systems and to a lesser degree in fixed wing time domain (FTEM) systems. The last five years of the decade have seen HTEM move from the development stage to capturing a significant portion of the world wide airborne EM survey market. Other FTEM and HTEM developments have included a push to greater bandwidth as evidenced by the introduction of B-field and step response data, the use of square wave transmitters,, new airborne platforms with higher performance capability and improved interpretation techniques.Other related airborne geophysical system developments have included hyperspectral imaging and a revisiting of the natural field airborne EM method, AFMAG.There remain enough opportunities (and unresolved issues) to create the opportunity for significant new advances over the next decade.

[1]  Peter Annan,et al.  The use of B-field measurements in an airborne time-domain system: Part I. Benefits of B-field versus dB/dt data , 1998 .

[2]  Cathy P. Foley,et al.  Potential use of high Tc SQUIDS for airborne electromagnetics , 1998 .

[3]  S. Kapotas,et al.  Envionmental applications of airborne radiometric surveys , 2003 .

[4]  James Macnae,et al.  Terrain corrections are critical for airborne gravity gradiometer data , 1997 .

[5]  Airborne EM measurements over the Shea Creek Uranium prospect, Saskatchewan, Canada , 2006 .

[6]  Les P. Beard,et al.  Analysis of Correlated Noise in Airborne Magnetic Gradients for Unexploded Ordnance Detection , 2004 .

[7]  Pierre Keating,et al.  The usefulness of multicomponent, time-domain airborne electromagnetic measurements , 1996 .

[8]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Applications of geophysical inversions in mineral exploration , 1998 .

[9]  S. Billings,et al.  Modeling detector response in airborne gamma-ray spectrometry , 1999 .

[10]  S. J. Balch,et al.  The AeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system , 2003 .

[11]  J. Macnae,et al.  Fast Approximate Inversion of Tem Data , 1997 .

[12]  E. H. V. Leeuwen BHP develops airborne gravity gradiometer for mineral exploration , 2000 .

[13]  A. Raiche Practical 3D airborne EM inversion in complex terranes , 2004 .

[14]  D. Sattel,et al.  Approximate 2D Inversion of AEM Data , 2003 .

[16]  J. Pitkin,et al.  Chairman's Report , 2003, The journal of the British Menopause Society.

[17]  R. Smith,et al.  A helicopter time-domain EM system applied to mineral exploration: system and data , 2005 .

[18]  L. Rybach,et al.  Airborne surveys of Swiss nuclear facility sites. , 2001, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[19]  P. Robinson,et al.  Use of 214Pb Photopeaks for Radon Removal: Utilising Current Airborne Gamma-Ray Spectrometer Technology and Data Processing , 2005 .

[20]  G. Pickup,et al.  Identifying large‐scale erosion and deposition processes from airborne gamma radiometrics and digital elevation models in a weathered landscape , 2000 .

[21]  T. Munday,et al.  A Geological Interpretation of Observed Electrical Structures in the Regolith: Lawlers, Western Australia , 2001 .

[22]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Inversion of time-domain electromagnetic data for a horizontally layered Earth , 1993 .

[23]  J. Macnae,et al.  Removing the regolith: EM defined structure fails to correct gravity at Elura , 1999 .

[24]  M. Odegard,et al.  Advances in gravity survey resolution , 2002 .

[25]  Closing the Gap Between Research And Practice In EM Data Interpretation , 2004 .

[26]  Colin G. Farquharson Simultaneous one-dimensional inversion of electromagnetic loop-loop data for both magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity , 2000 .

[27]  D. Sattel,et al.  The feasibility of electromagnetic gradiometer measurements , 2001 .

[28]  M. Peshko,et al.  The development of new exploration technologies at Noranda: Seeing more with hyperspectral and deeper with 3-D seismic , 2002 .

[29]  Practical Inversions For Helicopter Electromagnetic Data , 2003 .

[30]  Les P. Beard,et al.  Field tests of an experimental helicopter time-domain electromagnetic system for unexploded ordnance detection , 2004 .

[31]  Michel Allard,et al.  The MEGATEM fixed-wing transient EM system applied to mineral exploration: a discovery case history , 2003 .

[32]  Richard S. Smith On the effect of varying the pulse width to detect high conductance bodies , 1998 .

[33]  Mark A. Downey,et al.  Airborne TEM surveying with a SQUID magnetometer sensor , 2002 .

[34]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A comparison of automatic techniques for estimating the regularization parameter in non-linear inverse problems , 2004 .

[35]  J. Macnae,et al.  Automatic estimation of EM parameters in tau-domain , 1998 .

[36]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Digital soil mapping : an introductory perspective , 2007 .

[37]  Michael W. Asten,et al.  Experience with SQUID Magnetometers in Airborne TEM Surveying , 2001 .

[38]  R. Ellis Inversion of airborne electromagnetic data , 1998 .

[39]  Luise Sander,et al.  AIRGrav results a comparison of airborne gravity data with GSC test site data , 2000 .

[40]  Detecting kimberlite pipes at Ekati with airborne gravity gradiometry , 2001 .

[41]  Keating A Comparison Between Old and Recent Airborne Time-Domain Electromagnetic Surveys Flown in the Chibougamau Region , Eastern Canada , 2007 .

[42]  David M. Fountain Airborne electromagnetic systems - 50 years of development , 1998 .

[43]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  Application of a modified GEOTEM system to reconnaissance exploration for kimberlites in the Point Lake area, NWT, Canada , 1996 .

[44]  J. Macnae,et al.  Resistive limit modeling of airborne electromagnetic data , 2002 .

[45]  Modelling the airborne electromagnetic response of a vertical contact , 2000 .

[46]  Bob Lo,et al.  Abstract: AFMAG: Geotech’s New Airborne Audio Frequency Electromagnetic (EM) Systemn , 2004 .

[47]  Peter J. Elliott,et al.  The principles and practice of FLAIRTEM , 1998 .

[48]  Ken Witherly,et al.  The Tli Kwi Cho kimberlite complex, Northwest Territories, Canada: A geophysical case study , 2004 .

[49]  A. Raiche,et al.  Finding targets in complex hosts using airborne EM , 2003 .

[50]  Haoping Huang,et al.  Airborne resistivity and susceptibility mapping in magnetically polarizable areas , 2000 .

[51]  Marc A. Vallée,et al.  Geophysical Case Study of the Iso and New Insco Deposits, Québec, Canada, Part II: Modeling and Interpretation , 2006 .

[52]  Robert G. Ellis,et al.  Inversion of airborne electromagnetic data , 1998 .

[53]  On the airborne transient EM response of a magnetic anomaly , 1999 .

[54]  Robert G. Ellis,et al.  Electromagnetic Inversion Using the QMR-FFT Fast Integral Equation Method , 2002 .

[55]  Allard On the Origin of the HTEM Species , 2007 .

[56]  J. Peirce,et al.  Advantages of close line spacing in airborne gravimetric surveys , 2003 .

[57]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  64 Advances in Airborne Time-Domain EM Technology , 1997 .

[58]  Block modelling as a check on the interpretation of stitched CDI sections from AEM data , 1998 .

[59]  Daniel Sattel,et al.  Improving conductivity models using on-time EM data , 1998 .

[60]  James Macnae,et al.  Fast AEM data processing and inversion , 1998 .

[61]  R. Blewett,et al.  A high-resolution, calibrated airborne radiometric dataset applied to the estimation of crustal heat production in the Archaean northern Pilbara Craton, Western Australia , 2004 .

[62]  J. B. Lee,et al.  FALCON gravity gradiometer technology , 2001 .

[63]  K. Witherly,et al.  The Application of Airborne Electromagnetics to the Search for High Conductance Targets , 2003 .

[64]  Greg Hodges A World Of Applications For Helicopter Electromagnetics To Environmental And Engineering Problems , 1999 .

[65]  Caleb Plunkett,et al.  An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system , 2000 .

[66]  Esben Auken,et al.  SkyTEM–a New High-resolution Helicopter Transient Electromagnetic System , 2004 .

[67]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  A special circumstance of airborne induced-polarization measurements , 1996 .

[68]  Marc A. Vallée,et al.  Gridding aeromagnetic data using longitudinal and transverse horizontal gradients with the minimum curvature operator , 2005 .

[69]  K. Witherly The quest for the Holy Grail in mining geophysics: A review of the development and application of airborne EM systems over the last 50 years , 2000 .

[70]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Measurement of noise in airborne gravity data using even and odd grids , 2002 .

[71]  D. Schumacher,et al.  Surface geochemical exploration for oil and gas: New life for an old technology , 2000 .

[72]  J. Peirce,et al.  Turner Valley, Canada — A case history in contemporary airborne gravity , 2002 .

[73]  A quantitative appraisal of airborne and ground-based transient electromagnetic (TEM) measurements in Denmark , 2003 .

[74]  A. Peter Annan,et al.  A comparison of data from airborne, semi‐airborne, and ground electromagnetic systems , 2001 .

[75]  Richard Irvine,et al.  The VTEM heli-time domain EM system-Four Case Studies , 2006 .

[76]  T. Munday,et al.  Improved Mapping Of Conductive Clays And Groundwater Salinity Using Attitude-Corrected Helicopter-Borne Em , 2007 .

[77]  K. Witherly,et al.  The geotech VTEM time domain helicopter em system , 2004 .

[78]  Daniel Sattel,et al.  Novel ways to process and model GEOTEM and MEGATEM data , 2004 .

[79]  S. Ferguson,et al.  The AIRGrav airborne gravity system , 2004 .

[80]  R. Grasty Radon emanation and soil moisture effects on airborne gamma-ray measurements , 1997 .

[81]  James Macnae,et al.  Electrical and EM methods, 1980–2005 , 2005 .

[82]  Changchun Yin,et al.  Influence of displacement current on helicopter EM signal , 2004 .

[83]  P. Wolfgram,et al.  The use of B-field measurements in an airborne time-domain system – Part II: examples in conductive regimes , 1998 .

[84]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  The moments of the impulse response: A new paradigm for the interpretation of transient electromagnetic data , 2002 .

[85]  R. Siegler The Quest for the Holy Grail. , 1981 .

[86]  E. Schetselaar Petrogenetic interpretation from gamma-ray spectrometry and geological data: the Arch Lake zoned peraluminous granite intrusion, Western Canadian Shield , 2002 .

[87]  The emerging role of helicopter time domain EM systems , 2004 .

[88]  MAPPING DIELECTRIC PERMITTIVITY AND RESISTIVITY USING HIGH FREQUENCY HELICOPTER-BORNE EM DATA , 1998 .

[89]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Automatic Estimation of the Trade-off Parameter In Nonlinear Inverse Problems Using the GCV And L-curve Criteria , 2000 .

[90]  Mapping conductivity, magnetic susceptibility, and dielectric permittivity with helicopter electromagnetic data , 2004 .

[91]  James Macnae,et al.  Approximate Modeling of Current Gathering Effects In Airborne Electromagnetic Data , 1998 .

[92]  Donald F. Saunders,et al.  Model for Hydrocarbon Microseepage and Related Near-Surface Alterations , 1999 .

[93]  J. Macnae Improving the accuracy of shallow depth determinations in AEM sounding , 2003 .

[94]  Daniel Sattel,et al.  Inverting airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data with Zohdy's method , 2005 .

[95]  A. Peter Annan,et al.  Using an induction coil sensor to indirectly measure the B-field response in the bandwidth of the transient electromagnetic method , 1999 .

[96]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Localized S-inversion of time-domain electromagnetic data , 2002 .