The influence of obstacles on grasp planning

When reaching to grasp for an object in the absence of obstacles, the choice of contact points is highly consistent within and between healthy humans, suggesting a preplanning of grasping movements (Gilster et al. in Exp Brain Res 217:137–151, 2012). In real life, objects may obstruct the favored contact points at a target object, requiring adjustments to avoid collision. In the present study, we investigated how an obstacle that directly obstructs the favored contact points for two-digit grasping changes the planning and execution of reach-to-grasp movements. Furthermore, we elucidated to what extent an obstacle placed at various angular positions around the target object (thereby not directly obstructing the favored contact points) still influences trajectories, contact points, and time-related parameters. When obstacles directly obstructed favored contact points participants either chose a completely new contact point or grasped the object only slightly away from the favored contact point. Obstacles located near the favored contact points but not directly obstructing them still resulted in a repulsive effect, meaning that contact points were shifted away from the obstacle to ensure sufficient distance to the obstacle. We found that the position of an obstacle even influences the direction in which the fingers set off. This leads to a deviation of the trajectory very early in the time course, yielding longer movement times if the main contact points are obstructed. Taken together, the early significant influence of obstacles on the grasping movement supports the assumption that grasping movements are preplanned.

[1]  A. Wing,et al.  Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  B. Steenbergen,et al.  The effect of the “rod-and-frame” illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Planning movements well in advance , 2008, Cognitive Neuropsychology.

[4]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[5]  D Voudouris,et al.  Ultra-fast selection of grasping points. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points? , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .

[9]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Eli Brenner,et al.  On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Caldwell,et al.  From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[12]  J. Peacock Two-dimensional goodness-of-fit testing in astronomy , 1983 .

[13]  E. Brenner,et al.  Posture of the arm when grasping spheres to place them elsewhere , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[15]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Adjustments of Speed and Path when Avoiding Collisions with Another Pedestrian , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[18]  J. Tresilian Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  A. Iserles Numerical recipes in C—the art of scientific computing , by W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky and W. T. Vetterling. Pp 735. £27·50. 1988. ISBN 0-521-35465-X (Cambridge University Press) , 1989, The Mathematical Gazette.

[20]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction–adduction , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  J B J Smeets,et al.  Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points? , 2012, Human movement science.