Inquiring into the Governance of Ecosystem Services: An Introduction.

The present chapter develops a brief, introductory account of some of the more stringent perspectives and proposals on how to inquire into the governance of ecosystem services. The objective is not to provide a state-of-the-art document, but to propose a limited set of contingent domains of inquiry. The double shift from government to governance and from ecosystems/species as the object of steering to ecosystem services drastically opens the set of domains of inquiry into recognizing more complexity, more processes, more actors, more natures of actors, more dynamics, more networks, more scales, and more times. We conclude that while embracing knowledge diversity has been considered a strategy for taking into account the many faces of complexity, the foreclosure of knowledge-providing mechanisms is an obvious issue of power that should be subjected to closer inquiry in socioecological governance thinking. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

[1]  Robert Fish,et al.  Environmental decision making and an ecosystems approach , 2011 .

[2]  Paul Cilliers,et al.  Complexity, Deconstruction and Relativism , 2005 .

[3]  R. Norgaard Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder , 2010 .

[4]  H. Wittmer,et al.  How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts , 2006 .

[5]  F. Biermann Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research , 2007 .

[6]  A. Bartoňová,et al.  Policy relevant Results from an Expert Elicitation on the Human Health Risks of Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) and Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) , 2012, Environmental Health.

[7]  Cathy Wilkinson,et al.  Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory , 2012 .

[8]  S. Jasanoff Designs on Nature , 2005 .

[9]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[10]  J. Anderies,et al.  Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[11]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Consumer Preferences Determine Resilience of Ecological-Economic Systems , 2011 .

[12]  Robert B. Gibson,et al.  Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice , 2005 .

[13]  L. Slavíková,et al.  From government to governance for biodiversity: the perspective of central and Eastern European transition countries , 2009 .

[14]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[15]  J. Voss,et al.  The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management , 2011 .

[16]  J. Rosenau Governance Without Government: Governance, order, and change in world politics , 1992 .

[17]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2010 .

[18]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Governance of Sustainable Development: Taking Stock and Looking Forwards , 2008 .

[19]  H. Keune Critical complexity in environmental health practice: simplify and complexify , 2012, Environmental Health.

[20]  A. Vatn An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal , 2009 .