The Repair Process of the Uterine Cervix Subjected to CO2 Laser Vaporization: A Pilot Study

Objective: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) frequently affects young women in childbearing age. Present literature does not provide scientific consensus on the real incidence of obstetric complications after the various conservative techniques performed. Most of all literature data are still lacking a pathophysiological basis to explain the different impact of various treatment techniques on the functional integrity of the uterine cervix. The gold standard conservative treatment is the excisional therapy. This study tried to analyze the evolution of tissue repair of cervix subjected to CO2 laser conization for high grade CIN with the aim of identifying eventual differences between the repaired tissue and the original cervical one. Study Design: The analysis was conducted on histological seriated samples of uterine cervix obtained at standardized times after conization treatments and then analyzed using histological examination and immunohistochemical staining. Results: This study showed that the tissue concentration of TGFβ1 was significantly low in patients treated with CO2 laser, confirming the reduced inflammatory reaction after laser treatment. Another very interesting result was the high ratio of type III and type I collagen: the prevalence of type III collagen suggested a regeneration of tissue without scarring after laser therapy. Conclusion: Tissue repair process after CO2 laser cervical treatment is able to compensate the loss of substance in damaged area and at the same time to limit the deposition of disorganized connective matrix, typical of scars, leading to a morphologic and functional restitutio ad integrum of the treated cervical tissue, which tends to be similar to the original one.

[1]  H. Dickinson,et al.  Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  Robert P Berkowitz,et al.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  Diane Solomon,et al.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  E. Mauldin,et al.  Diminished Type III Collagen Promotes Myofibroblast Differentiation and Increases Scar Deposition in Cutaneous Wound Healing , 2011, Cells Tissues Organs.

[5]  E. Valmaseda-Castellón,et al.  Histologic evaluation of thermal damage produced on soft tissues by CO2, Er,Cr:YSGG and diode lasers. , 2010, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[6]  N. Occleston,et al.  Therapeutic Improvement of Scarring: Mechanisms of Scarless and Scar-Forming Healing and Approaches to the Discovery of New Treatments , 2010, Dermatology research and practice.

[7]  K. Frederiksen,et al.  Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery , 2007, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  Dimitrios Filippou,et al.  Tissue concentration of transforming growth factor β1 and basic fibroblast growth factor in skin wounds created with a CO2 laser and scalpel: A comparative experimental study, using an animal model of skin resurfacing , 2007, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[9]  J. Bernard,et al.  Effects of laser therapy in CO2 laser wounds in rats. , 2006, Photomedicine and laser surgery.

[10]  M Arbyn,et al.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.

[11]  T. Hamilton,et al.  Connective tissue remodeling induced by carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photodamaged human skin. , 2004, Archives of dermatology.

[12]  S. O'Kane,et al.  Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  D. Terris,et al.  A Comparison of Mucosal Incisions Made by Scalpel, CO2 Laser, Electrocautery, and Constant-Voltage Electrocautery , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  H. Kitchener,et al.  Thermal Tissue Damage Following Laser and Large Loop Conization of the Cervix , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  H. Lorenz,et al.  Cells, Matrix, Growth Factors, and the Surgeon The Biology of Scarless Fetal Wound Repair , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[16]  Serge Mordon,et al.  Can Thermal Lasers Promote Skin Wound Healing? , 2003, American journal of clinical dermatology.