Door-in-Door-Out Time at Primary Stroke Centers May Predict Outcome for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Patients

Background and Purpose— Interfacility transfers for thrombectomy in stroke patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) are associated with longer treatment times and worse outcomes. In this series, we examined the association between Primary Stroke Center (PSC) door-in to door-out (DIDO) times and outcomes for confirmed ELVO stroke transfers and factors that may modify the interaction. Methods— We retrospectively identified 160 patients transferred to a single Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) with anterior circulation ELVO between July 1, 2015 and May 30, 2017. We included patients with acute occlusions of the internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2 segments), with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥6. Workflow metrics included time from onset to recanalization, PSC DIDO, interfacility transfer time, CSC arrival to arterial puncture, and arterial puncture to recanalization. Primary outcome measure was National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at discharge and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Results— The median (Q1–Q3) age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of the 130 ELVO transfers analyzed was 75 (64–84) and 17 (11–22). Intravenous alteplase was administered to 64% of patients. Regarding specific workflow metrics, median (Q1–Q3) times (in minutes) were 241 (199–332) for onset to recanalization, 85 (68–111) for PSC DIDO, 26 (17–32) for interfacility transport, 21 (16–39) for CSC door to arterial puncture, and 24 (15–35) for puncture to recanalization. Median discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 5 (2–16), and 46 (35%) patients had a favorable outcome at 90 days. Complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia 2c/3) modified the deleterious association of DIDO on outcome. Conclusions— For patients diagnosed with ELVO at a PSC who are being transferred to a CSC for thrombectomy, longer DIDO times may have a deleterious effect on outcomes and may represent the single biggest modifiable factor in onset to recanalization time. PSCs should make efforts to decrease DIDO and routine use of DIDO as a performance measure is encouraged.

[1]  W. Powers,et al.  2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2018, Stroke.

[2]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  J. Saver,et al.  Abstract TP33: Code Stroke vs Code STEMI: Greater Clinical Impact From Accelerating Door to Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Ischemic Stroke Than Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2018 .

[4]  M. Chen,et al.  Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Stratis Investigators,et al.  Interhospital Transfer Before Thrombectomy Is Associated With Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke) , 2017 .

[6]  David F. Kallmes,et al.  Interhospital Transfer Before Thrombectomy Is Associated With Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke) , 2017, Circulation.

[7]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  K. Furie,et al.  Association of a Primary Stroke Center Protocol for Suspected Stroke by Large-Vessel Occlusion With Efficiency of Care and Patient Outcomes , 2017, JAMA neurology.

[9]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  A multicenter randomized controlled trial of endovascular therapy following imaging evaluation for ischemic stroke (DEFUSE 3) , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[10]  M. Jayaraman,et al.  Continuous aspiration prior to intracranial vascular embolectomy (CAPTIVE): a technique which improves outcomes , 2016, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[11]  M. Kontos,et al.  Association Between Hospital Practices and Door-in-door-out Time in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. , 2016, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[12]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[13]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials , 2016, The Lancet.

[14]  A. Rai,et al.  Complete reperfusion mitigates influence of treatment time on outcomes after acute stroke , 2016, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[15]  H. Diener,et al.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Krause,et al.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  R. Nogueira,et al.  “Picture to Puncture”: A Novel Time Metric to Enhance Outcomes in Patients Transferred for Endovascular Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2013, Circulation.

[21]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, JAMA.

[22]  M. Chen,et al.  Transfer Delay Is a Major Factor Limiting the Use of Intra-Arterial Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[23]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, JAMA.

[24]  Noreen Kamal,et al.  Drip ‘n Ship Versus Mothership for Endovascular Treatment: Modeling the Best Transportation Options for Optimal Outcomes , 2017, Stroke.

[25]  M. Hill,et al.  Drip and Ship Versus Direct to Comprehensive Stroke Center: Conditional Probability Modeling , 2017, Stroke.