Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture.

Motion analysis is an important tool for examining upper-limb function. Based on previous work demonstrating a modified Box and Blocks (BB) test with motion capture to assess prosthetic performance, we collected data in 16 nondisabled participants to establish normative kinematics for this test. Four motions of the modified BB test were analyzed to establish kinematic data for upper-limb and trunk motion. The test was repeated for right and left arms in standing and seated positions. Data were compared using a nonparametric Friedman test. No differences were found between right- and left-hand performance other than for task completion time. Small but significant differences were found for standing and seated performance, with slightly greater ranges in standing for axial trunk rotation, medial-lateral sternum displacement, and anterior-posterior hand displacement. The kinematic trajectories, however, were very consistent. The consistency in our nondisabled data suggests that normative kinematic trajectories can be defined for this task. This motion capture procedure may add to the understanding of movement in upper-limb impairment and may be useful for measuring the effect of interventions to improve upper-limb function.

[1]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  R. Hébert,et al.  Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Kerrigan Dc,et al.  Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. , 1998 .

[4]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[5]  Anita Bagley,et al.  A method for determination of upper extremity kinematics. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[6]  Paul H Chappell,et al.  Marker placement to describe the wrist movements during activities of daily living in cyclical tasks. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  G. Harris,et al.  An upper extremity kinematic model for evaluation of hemiparetic stroke. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Catherine Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  An upper body model for the kinematical analysis of the joint chain of the human arm. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  F. Fitoussi,et al.  Kinematic analysis of the upper limb: a useful tool in children with cerebral palsy , 2006, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[11]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Deviations in upper-limb function of the less-affected side in congenital hemiparesis , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  P. Chappell,et al.  A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF. , 2007, Musculoskeletal care.

[13]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Improved Myoelectric Prosthesis Control Using Targeted Reinnervation Surgery: A Case Series , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[16]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Effect of training on upper-extremity prosthetic performance and motor learning: a single-case study. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Kaat Desloovere,et al.  Review of quantitative measurements of upper limb movements in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[18]  Jeffrey M. Thompson,et al.  Reliability of the box and block test of manual dexterity for use with patients with fibromyalgia. , 2009, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[19]  Ronglei Sun,et al.  Kinematic analysis and dexterity evaluation of upper extremity in activities of daily living. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[20]  Alessio Murgia,et al.  The use of kinematic and parametric information to highlight lack of movement and compensation in the upper extremities during activities of daily living. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[21]  Li-ling Chuang,et al.  Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Jacqueline S. Hebert,et al.  Case report of modified Box and Blocks test with motion capture to measure prosthetic function. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  Sarah F Tyson,et al.  Clinical reality of measuring upper-limb ability in neurologic conditions: a systematic review. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Milos R Popovic,et al.  A comprehensive three-dimensional dynamic model of the human head and trunk for estimating lumbar and cervical joint torques and forces from upper body kinematics. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.