Policy Area as a Potential Moderator of Transparency Effects: An Experiment
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. Cook,et al. Trusting What You Know: Information, Knowledge, and Confidence in Social Security (WP-02-38) , 2010 .
[2] Ben Worthy,et al. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government , 2010 .
[3] P. Tetlock. Elements of Reason: Coping with Trade-Offs: Psychological Constraints and Political Implications , 2000 .
[4] Gregory A. Porumbescu,et al. The effect of transparency in trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. , 2013 .
[5] Tom R. Tyler,et al. More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures , 2011 .
[6] S. Kim,et al. The Role of Trust in the Modern Administrative State , 2005 .
[7] Jane J. Mansbridge. A 'Selection Model' of Political Representation , 2008 .
[8] Mikael Persson,et al. The effects of direct voting and deliberation on legitimacy beliefs: an experimental study of small group decision-making , 2012, European Political Science Review.
[9] Jenny de Fine Licht. Do We Really Want to Know? The Potentially Negative Effect of Transparency in Decision Making on Perceived Legitimacy , 2011 .
[10] Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen,et al. Transparency of Public Decision‐Making: Towards Trust in Local Government? , 2010 .
[11] Tom R. Tyler,et al. Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs , 2009 .
[12] Monika Bauhr,et al. Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability , 2014 .
[13] Caroline J. Tolbert,et al. The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government , 2003, DG.O.
[14] D. Weil,et al. Full disclosure : the perils and promise of transparency , 2007 .
[15] Jenny de Fine Licht,et al. When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context‐Bound Relationship , 2014 .
[16] T. Tyler. The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[17] P. Tetlock. Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[18] Albert Jacob Meijer,et al. Publishing public performance results on the Internet: Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account? , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..
[19] Catharina Lindstedt,et al. Transparency is not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption , 2010 .
[20] P. Tetlock,et al. The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[21] Jenny de Fine Licht. Transparency actually: how transparency affects public perceptions of political decision-making , 2014 .
[22] P. Tetlock,et al. Taboo Trade‐offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of Justice , 1997 .
[23] C. Hood,et al. Transparency: the Key to Better Governance? , 2006 .
[24] A. Meijer. Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency , 2013 .
[25] Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen,et al. Transparency and trust. An experimental study of online disclosure and trust in government , 2012 .
[26] A. Meijer. Understanding modern transparency , 2009 .
[27] Frank Bannister,et al. The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e‐Government , 2011 .
[28] A. Meijer,et al. Effects of Transparency on the Perceived Trustworthiness of a Government Organization: Evidence from an Online Experiment , 2014 .
[29] T. Tyler,et al. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.