Attending to spatial locations: a developmental study.

In 2 experiments, 7- and 8-year-old children and college students performed a letter-detection task in which reaction time was the dependent variable. Expectancy was manipulated by varying the probability the stimulus would appear at the center of an imaginary circle rather than along the perimeter. Although both age groups responded consistently faster to stimuli presented in expected locations than to stimuli presented in unexpected locations, this expectancy effect was larger for the children than it was for the college students. In a third experiment, these results were replicated using a luminance-detection task with 5-year-olds, 8-year-olds, and college students as subjects. It was concluded that children as well as adults are able to expand or contract the breadth of their attentional focus in accordance with task demands and that there is a developmental change in the efficiency with which a stimulus presented in an otherwise empty field can be located. Furthermore, it was suggested that children may be more disrupted by the occurrence of an unexpected event than adults are.

[1]  Peter A. Ornstein,et al.  Memory development in children , 2014 .

[2]  H. Taylor Age differences in peripheral letter perception. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  A. Well,et al.  Developmental trends in distractibility: is absolute or proportional decrement the appropriate measure of interference? , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  J. Jonides Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  M. Day,et al.  Children's use of perceptual set. , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  D. Lane Developmental changes in attention-deployment skills ☆ , 1979 .

[9]  G. Geffen,et al.  Development of Three Strategies of Attention in Dichotic Monitoring. , 1979 .

[10]  M. Haith,et al.  Peripheral vision: the effects of developmental, perceptual, and cognitive factors. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  W. O. Shaffer,et al.  Attending to forty-nine spatial positions at once. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement? , 1974 .

[13]  Gordon A. Hale,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF ATTENTION IN CHILDREN1 , 1973 .

[14]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[15]  L. K. Miller Developmental differences in the field of view during tachistoscopic presentation. , 1971, Child development.

[16]  D. Bakan,et al.  The test of significance in psychological research. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  M. Hoffman,et al.  Review of Child Development Research , 1966 .

[18]  J. Duncan,et al.  Directing attention in the visual field , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  David M. Lane,et al.  Reaction time measurement errors resulting from the use of CRT displays , 1980 .

[20]  G. Geffen,et al.  The development of auditory strategies of attention. , 1978 .

[21]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Attention and Preattention , 1977 .

[22]  M. Haith,et al.  Developmental changes in visual information processing and short-term visual memory. , 1971, Human development.

[23]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .