The need for biological assessment of water quality: Australian perspective

Biological assessment of water quality in Australia is entering a stage of rapid development largely because of the inclusion of biological indicators in water quality guidelines and growing concern for ecological values. Approaches to water quality assessment include toxicity testing, use of biomarkers and several methods using community structure. For assessment diverse organisms such as fish, algae and (the most commonly used) macro-invertebrates are used. Interaction of data analysis with methods of data collection requires co-ordinated research on both fronts. Recent developments in the use of multivariate statistics to produce models for predicting water quality are likely to be useful in Australia. Much innovative work is still needed in Australia on the use of algae and fish, defining tolerance categories and establishing monitoring programmes performed in time-frames equivalent to those in use for physical and chemical methods.

[1]  R. Norris,et al.  Design and implementation of rapid assessment approaches for water resource monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates , 1995 .

[2]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programmes to detect environmental impacts in a variable world , 1993 .

[3]  Robert C. Bailey,et al.  Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on BEnthic Assessment of SedimenT (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological state , 1995 .

[4]  Suess.  Examination of water for pollution control: A reference handbook. Sampling, data analysis and laboratory equipment , 1982 .

[5]  R. Green,et al.  Application of repeated measures designs in environmental impact and monitoring studies , 1993 .

[6]  Pj Millington,et al.  Australian Freshwater Mussel Velesunio ambiguus (Philippi) as a Biological Monitor for Zinc, Iron and Manganese , 1983 .

[7]  John H. Harris,et al.  The use of fish in ecological assessments , 1995 .

[8]  J. Wilhm,et al.  Biological Parameters for Water Quality Criteria , 1968 .

[9]  C. L. Humphrey,et al.  Detection of mining impacts on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities: results of a disturbance experiment and the design of a multivariate BACIP monitoring programme at Coronation Hill, Northern Territory , 1995 .

[10]  Cairns,et al.  Biological monitoring in water pollution , 1982 .

[11]  J. F. Wright,et al.  Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters , 1995 .

[12]  J. M. Hellawell.  Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management , 1986 .

[13]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  Distribution of benthic invertebrates along a disturbed section of the La Trobe River, Victoria: an analysis based on numerical classification , 1984 .

[14]  Robert W. Poole,et al.  An introduction to quantitative ecology , 1974 .

[15]  S. Hurlbert.  The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Parameters. , 1971, Ecology.

[16]  J. C. Chapman,et al.  The role of ecotoxicity testing in assessing water quality , 1995 .

[17]  J. Downing,et al.  Aggregation, Transformation, and the Design of Benthos Sampling Programs , 1979 .

[18]  B. Whitton,et al.  Use of algae and other plants for monitoring rivers , 1995 .

[19]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  Design and Analysis for Assessment of Water Quality , 1986 .

[20]  J. Wilhm.  Graphic and Mathematical Analyses of Biotic Communities in Polluted Streams , 1972 .

[21]  Mike T. Furse,et al.  A preliminary classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain based on macro‐invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data , 1984 .

[22]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Beyond BACI: Experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations , 1991 .

[23]  P. Lake,et al.  Ecological effects of mine effluents on the South Esk River, North-eastren Tasmania. III. Benthic Macroinvertebrates. , 1982 .

[24]  G. Lee,et al.  Interpretation of Chemical Water Quality Data , 1979 .

[25]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[26]  Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: Case studies in the Nepean River and Blue Mountains, NSW , 1995 .

[27]  R. Kolkwitz,et al.  Ökologie der tierischen Saprobien. Beiträge zur Lehre von der biologischen Gewässerbeurteilung , 1909 .

[28]  B. Chessman,et al.  Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: A procedure based on habitat‐specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index , 1995 .

[29]  R. Green,et al.  Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists , 1979 .

[30]  S. Hurlbert.  Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[31]  R. Marchant.  Robustness of Classification and Ordination Techniques Applied to Macroinvertebrate Communities from the La Trobe River, Victoria , 1990 .

[32]  D. Holdway,et al.  Short review of selected fish biomarkers of xenobiotic exposure with an example using fish hepatic mixed‐function oxidase , 1995 .

[33]  R. H. Norris,et al.  Water quality assessment programs in Australia deciding what to measure, and how and where to use bioindicators , 1990, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[34]  Jgt Carter,et al.  Uptake of Zinc by the Aquatic Larvae of Simulium ornatipes (Diptera : Nematocera) , 1978 .

[35]  H. Washington,et al.  Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems , 1984 .