Optimization with variable-fidelity models applied to wing design

This work discusses an approach, the Approximation Management Framework (AMF), for solving optimization problems that involve computationally expensive simulations. AMF aims to maximize the use of lower-fidelity, cheaper models in iterative procedures with occasional, but systematic, recourse to higher-fidelity, more expensive models for monitoring the progress of the algorithm. The method is globally convergent to a solution of the original, high-fidelity problem. Three versions of AMF, based on three nonlinear programming algorithms, are demonstrated on a 3D aerodynamic wing optimization problem and a 2D airfoil optimization problem. In both cases Euler analysis solved on meshes of various refinement provides a suite of variable-fidelity models. Preliminary results indicate threefold savings in terms of high-fidelity analyses in case of the 3D problem and twofold savings for the 2D problem.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Mordecai Avriel,et al.  Complementary Geometric Programming , 1970 .

[3]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Approximation and Complementary Geometric Programming , 1972 .

[4]  L. Schmit,et al.  Some Approximation Concepts for Structural Synthesis , 1974 .

[5]  L. Schmit,et al.  Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis , 1976 .

[6]  Lucien A. Schmit,et al.  Structural Synthesis by Combining Approximation Concepts and Dual Methods , 1980 .

[7]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[8]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  Recent Developments in Algorithms and Software for Trust Region Methods , 1982, ISMP.

[9]  P. Gill,et al.  User's Guide for SOL/NPSOL: A Fortran Package for Nonlinear Programming. , 1983 .

[10]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[11]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  User''s guide for NPSOL (Ver-sion 4.0): A FORTRAN package for nonlinear programming , 1984 .

[12]  E. Turkel,et al.  A multistage time-stepping scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations , 1985 .

[13]  V. Braibant,et al.  An approximation-concepts approach to shape optimal design , 1985 .

[14]  P. Hajela Geometric programming strategies in large-scale structural synthesis , 1986 .

[15]  P. Gill,et al.  Fortran package for nonlinear programming. User's Guide for NPSOL (Version 4. 0) , 1986 .

[16]  J. Strodiot,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS OF THE CONVEX LINEARIZATION METHOD FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1987 .

[17]  P. Toint,et al.  A globally convergent augmented Lagrangian algorithm for optimization with general constraints and simple bounds , 1991 .

[18]  J. -F. M. Barthelemy,et al.  Approximation concepts for optimum structural design — a review , 1993 .

[19]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Sensitivity-based scaling for approximating. Structural response , 1993 .

[20]  J. Dennis,et al.  Multilevel algorithms for nonlinear optimization , 1995 .

[21]  E. Robert,et al.  Rapid Airplane Parametric Input Design (RAPID) , 1995 .

[22]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  A Coarse-Grained Parallel Variable-Complexity Multidisciplinary Optimization Paradigm , 1996, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[23]  Christian Bischof,et al.  Adifor 2.0: automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs , 1996 .

[24]  William T. Jones,et al.  Experiences with the application of the ADIC automatic differentiation tool for to the CSCMDO 3-D volume grid generation code , 1996 .

[25]  Robert Lewis,et al.  A trust region framework for managing approximation models in engineering optimization , 1996 .

[26]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Multilevel and multiobjective optimization in multidisciplinary design , 1996 .

[27]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization : state of the art , 1997 .

[28]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Essential Elements of Computational Algorithms for Aerodynamic Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[29]  James L. Thomas,et al.  CFL3D: Its History and Some Recent Applications , 1997 .

[30]  Anthony A. Giunta,et al.  Aircraft Multidisciplinary Design Optimization using Design of Experiments Theory and Response Surface Modeling Methods , 1997 .

[31]  Arthur C. Taylor,et al.  CFL3D.ADII (Version 2.0) - An efficient, accurate, general-purpose code for flow shape-sensitivity analysis , 1997 .

[32]  N. M. Alexandrov,et al.  A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization , 1997 .

[33]  Christian Bischof,et al.  The ADIFOR 2.0 system for the automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs , 1997 .

[34]  L. Watson,et al.  Trust Region Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Sequential Response Surface Approximation and Optimization , 1998 .

[35]  F. G. Blottner,et al.  Determination of Solution Accuracy of Numerical Schemes as Part of Code and Calculation Verification , 1998 .

[36]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[37]  Gene Hou,et al.  Overview of Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization for Complex Aerodynamic Configurations , 1999 .