Transient and steady state analysis of drill cuttings transport phenomena under turbulent conditions

Abstract Understanding the intricacies of multiphase flows is paramount to any drilling operation, and this has been under continuing and intensive development for the past decades. A major complexity associated with this operation is the uncertainty in the transport phenomena of generated cuttings as drilling progresses under different attainable configurations and fluid rheological conditions. Increased transport efficiency of drill cuttings in most drilling operations is usually characterised by an increased mud circulation velocity; this creates complex turbulent interactions between the solid and liquid phases. The study of the dispersion of these cuttings, in relation to their axial, tangential and slip velocity profiles in the annulus is carefully investigated in this work under steady and transient conditions. Computational Fluid Dynamics models (Eulerian–Eulerian, Lagrangian–Eulerian/Discrete Element Method) are utilised for this purpose. The implementation of the Eulerian–Eulerian model provides a macroscopic description of the distribution of fundamental flow properties such as pressure, volume fractions and velocities of each phase. Furthermore, a direct description of the particulate flow, inherent transient motion, interparticle and particle-wall collisions are obtained with the particle tracking functionality of the Lagrangian–Eulerian/DEM technique. The results obtained using the Eulerian–Eulerian model reveal that particle slip velocities are lowest at the central regions of the annulus with the effect of asymmetry due to inner pipe rotation being more pronounced along the longitudinal plane. Particle diameter has tremendous effects on the alteration of turbulence properties of the continuous phase with very distinct velocity profiles. Cuttings trajectory analysis show some extra phenomena which have been physically observed in available experimental studies; one of which is the occurrence of ejections of coherent structures at the walls of the flow domain. The difficulty of carrying out transient and steady state experimental measurements of particle velocities is an area where CFD shows great potential. The few available data in literature are well predicted with errors less than 11%. Similarly, fluid axial and tangential velocity predictions carried out, yield reasonably accurate results, thus further validating the CFD approach employed in this work.

[1]  D. Gidaspow Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions , 1994 .

[2]  C. Wen Mechanics of Fluidization , 1966 .

[3]  Clayton T. Crowe,et al.  Particle mixing in free shear flows , 1988 .

[4]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Ali Moradzadeh,et al.  CFD Simulation of Rheological Model Effect on Cuttings Transport , 2015 .

[6]  M. C. Roco,et al.  Modeling of slurry flow: The effect of particle size , 1983 .

[7]  J. J. Azar,et al.  Development of a New Cuttings-Transport Model for High-Angle Wellbores Including Horizontal Wells , 1997 .

[8]  R. Adrian Structure of Turbulent Boundary Layers , 2013 .

[9]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  Mathematical modeling and process simulation of perlite grain expansion in a vertical electrical furnace , 2014 .

[10]  Samuel Ameri,et al.  Understanding the Effect of Drilling Parameters on Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Deviated Wellbores Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2007 .

[11]  P. Saffman The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Fernando T. Pinho,et al.  Fully developed laminar flow of non-Newtonian liquids through annuli: comparison of numerical calculations with experiments , 2002 .

[13]  Clayton T. Crowe,et al.  PARTICLE DISPERSION BY COHERENT STRUCTURES IN FREE SHEAR FLOWS , 1985 .

[14]  Thomas J. Hanratty,et al.  A diffusion model for droplet deposition in gas/liquid annular flow , 1991 .

[15]  Nekkhil Mishra Investigation of hole cleaning parameters using computational fluid dynamics in horizontal and deviated wells , 2007 .

[16]  Arild Saasen,et al.  Critical Fluid Velocities for Removing Cuttings Bed Inside Horizontal and Deviated Wells , 2010 .

[17]  doguhan yilmaz DISCRETE PHASE SIMULATIONS OF DRILLED CUTTINGS TRANSPORT PROCESS IN HIGHLY DEVIATED WELLS , 2013 .

[18]  M. Sommerfeld,et al.  Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles , 2011 .

[19]  C. T. Crowe,et al.  Self-organizing particle dispersion mechanism in a plane wake , 1992 .

[20]  J. J. Azar,et al.  Experimental study of cuttings transport in directional wells , 1983 .

[21]  William Pao,et al.  CFD Method for Predicting Annular Pressure Losses and Cuttings Concentration in Eccentric Horizontal Wells , 2014 .

[22]  Andrew Ooi,et al.  The Entrance Length for Fully Developed Turbulent Channel Flow , 2004 .

[23]  Ramadan Ahmed,et al.  Cuttings Transport With Aqueous Foam at Intermediate-Inclined Wells , 2006 .

[24]  Karen Bybee Determination of Cuttings Lag in Horizontal and Deviated Wells , 2008 .

[25]  John M. Cimbala,et al.  Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications , 2004 .

[26]  Zhiming Wang,et al.  Effect of Drillpipe Rotation on Borehole Cleaning for Extended Reach Well , 2009 .

[27]  Jamshid M. Nouri,et al.  Flow of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in an eccentric annulus with rotation of the inner cylinder , 1994 .

[28]  Mehdi Behzad,et al.  CFD-DEM simulation of the hole cleaning process in a deviated well drilling: The effects of particle shape , 2016 .

[29]  Fabián J. Bonetto,et al.  Lateral forces on spheres in turbulent uniform shear flow , 1999 .

[30]  Mingqin Duan,et al.  Experimental Study and Modeling of Cuttings Transport Using Foam With Drillpipe Rotation , 2010 .

[31]  David G. Schaeffer,et al.  Instability in the evolution equations describing incompressible granular flow , 1987 .

[32]  Hojin Ahn,et al.  Experiments and analytical investigations of granular materials : shear flow and convective heat transfer , 1989 .

[33]  Gad Hetsroni,et al.  Particles-turbulence interaction , 1989 .

[34]  Christopher E. Brennen,et al.  Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow , 2005 .

[35]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  Modelling, design and optimisation of a hybrid PSA-membrane gas separation process , 2007 .

[36]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  First-principles Rheological Modelling and Parameter Estimation for Nanoparticle-based Smart Drilling Fluids , 2016 .

[37]  Stefan Z. Miska,et al.  Cuttings Transport with Foam in Highly Inclined Wells at Simulated Downhole Conditions / Transport urobku wiertniczego przy użyciu piany w silnie nachylonych otworach w symulowanych warunkach w otworze , 2013 .

[38]  Yefei Liu,et al.  Two-fluid modeling of gas-solid and gas-liquid flows: Solver development and application , 2014 .

[39]  M. Barigou Particle Tracking in Opaque Mixing Systems: An Overview of the Capabilities of PET and PEPT , 2004 .

[40]  Ali Moradzadeh,et al.  Simulation of cuttings transport with foam in deviated wellbores using computational fluid dynamics , 2014, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

[41]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Principles of gas-solid flows , 1998 .

[42]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  Dynamic Oil and Gas Production Optimization via Explicit Reservoir Simulation , 2006 .

[43]  Ramadan Ahmed,et al.  Transport of Small Cuttings in Extended-Reach Drilling , 2008 .

[44]  J. Chung,et al.  Effects of vortex pairing on particle dispersion in turbulent shear flows , 1987 .

[45]  Renwei Mei,et al.  Shear lift force on spherical bubbles , 1994 .

[46]  Ramadan Ahmed,et al.  The Effect of Drillpipe Rotation on Pressure Losses and Fluid Velocity Profile in Foam Drilling , 2008 .

[47]  H. I. Bilgesu,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) as a Tool to Study Cutting Transport in Wellbores , 2002 .

[48]  Y. Demiralp Effects Of Drill-pipe Whirling Motion On Cuttings Transport Performance For Horizontal Drilling , 2014 .

[49]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  A multiparametric CFD analysis of multiphase annular flows for oil and gas drilling applications , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[50]  Ramadan Ahmed,et al.  Experimental Study on Cuttings Transport With Foam Under Simulated Horizontal Downhole Conditions , 2007 .

[51]  Sang-Mok Han,et al.  Solid–liquid hydrodynamics in a slim hole drilling annulus , 2010 .

[52]  Pål Skalle,et al.  Investigating the impact of drillpipe's rotation and eccentricity on cuttings transport phenomenon in various horizontal annuluses using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) , 2017 .

[53]  Zisis Vryzas,et al.  Nano-Based Drilling Fluids: A Review , 2017 .

[54]  S. Subramaniam Lagrangian-Eulerian methods for multiphase flows , 2013 .

[55]  Nam-Sub Woo,et al.  Flow of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Fluids in a Concentric Annulus With Rotation of the Inner Cylinder , 2003 .

[56]  F. Bertrand,et al.  DEM-based models for the mixing of granular materials , 2005 .

[57]  F. A. R. Pereira,et al.  CFD APPROACH USING A DISCRETE PHASE MODEL FOR ANNULAR FLOW ANALYSIS , 2010 .

[58]  Mostafa Barigou,et al.  Horizontal laminar flow of coarse nearly-neutrally buoyant particles in non-Newtonian conveying fluids : CFD and PEPT experiments compared , 2008 .

[59]  R. Jackson,et al.  Frictional–collisional constitutive relations for granular materials, with application to plane shearing , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[60]  Mostafa Barigou,et al.  CFD investigation of the pipe transport of coarse solids in laminar power law fluids , 2009 .

[61]  Ramadan Ahmed,et al.  Cuttings Transport with Aqueous Foam at Intermediate Inclined Wells , 2004 .