Female breast shape categorization based on analysis of CAESAR 3D body scan data

In this study we explore the variation in female breast shape across the younger (age: 18–45), non-obese (BMI < 30) North American Caucasian population, a population that has not previously been well-represented in studies of breast shape. A method of classifying breast shape was developed based on multiple data-mining techniques. Forty-one relative measurements (i.e., ratios and angles) were constructed from 66 raw measurements (circumferences, depths, widths, etc.), extracted from 478 CAESAR (Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource) scans, using self-developed Matlab® programs. Seventy subjects were regarded as outliers and were removed. The remaining data were transformed and standardized to ensure robust analysis. To judge results, an algorithm was developed to visualize clustering outcomes in the form of side profiles of breasts. The results of three clustering methods, namely hierarchical, K-means, and K-medoids clustering, were compared. Finally, breast shapes were categorized into three and five groups by two different cluster number selection criteria proposed by the study: (1) based on misclassification rate; (2) based on the goodness-of-fit of the model. Several of the relative body measurements were identified to be critical in defining breast shape. The findings and the proposed methods of this study can contribute to the development of improved shape and sizing systems of bra products that work for both manufacturers and consumers. The new methodology developed in this study can also be applied to other types of intimate apparel products where an understanding of body shape plays a key role in body support, comfort, and fit.

[1]  Susan P. Ashdown,et al.  Comparison of 3-D Body Scan Data to Quantify Upper-Body Postural Variation in Older and Younger Women , 2008 .

[2]  Katherine Wood,et al.  Breast size, bra fit and thoracic pain in young women: a correlational study , 2008, Chiropractic & osteopathy.

[3]  G Catanuto,et al.  Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[4]  Susan P Ashdown,et al.  Categorization of lower body shapes for adult females based on multiple view analysis , 2011 .

[5]  Jintu Fan,et al.  Pressure evaluation of 3D seamless knitted bras and conventional wired bras , 2009 .

[6]  J. Thomson,et al.  Differences in Breast Shape Preferences between Plastic Surgeons and Patients Seeking Breast Augmentation , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. Morris,et al.  An investigation of the suitability of bra fit in women referred for reduction mammaplasty. , 2003, British journal of plastic surgery.

[8]  Hyun-Young Lee,et al.  Optimal brassiere wire based on the 3D anthropometric measurements of under breast curve. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Karen L. LaBat,et al.  Bust prominence related to bra fit problems , 2011 .

[10]  Woo Kyung Shin The origins and evolution of the bra , 2009 .

[11]  C. Hart,et al.  An exploratory study of the consumer decision process for intimate apparel , 2001 .

[12]  M. Tiggemann Body image across the adult life span: stability and change. , 2004, Body image.

[13]  E. Pechter,et al.  A new method for determining bra size and predicting postaugmentation breast size. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  O. Tepper,et al.  Re-defining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short scar-medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[15]  Cynthia L. Istook,et al.  VALIDATION OF 'FEMALE FIGURE IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUE (FFIT) FOR APPAREL ' SOFTWARE , 2004 .

[16]  Betty L. Feather,et al.  Female Collegiate Basketball Players' Perceptions About Their Bodies, Garment Fit and Uniform Design Preferences , 1996 .

[17]  Joanne Yip,et al.  How does visual merchandising affect consumer affective response , 2012 .

[18]  Julie R Steele,et al.  Optimising breast support in female patients through correct bra fit. A cross-sectional study. , 2010, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[19]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[20]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Measurements of Breast Density: No Ratio for a Ratio , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[21]  Jongsuk Chun,et al.  New Breast Measurement Technique and Bra Sizing System Based on 3D Body Scan Data , 2014 .

[22]  J. Farrell-Beck,et al.  Brassieres and Women's Health from 1863 to 1940 , 1998 .

[23]  Karen Louiselilev Labat Consumer satisfaction : Dissatisfaction with the fit of ready-to-wear clothing , 1987 .

[24]  Jintu Fan,et al.  Development of a new chinese bra sizing system based on breast anthropometric measurements , 2007 .

[25]  B. Farnworth,et al.  Heat and Water Transport Through Cotton and Polypropylene Underwear , 1985 .

[26]  J White,et al.  Evaluation of professional bra fitting criteria for bra selection and fitting in the UK , 2012, Ergonomics.