Strength of Hydrogen Bond Network Takes Crucial Roles in the Dissociation Process of Inhibitors from the HIV-1 Protease Binding Pocket

To understand the underlying mechanisms of significant differences in dissociation rate constant among different inhibitors for HIV-1 protease, we performed steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations to analyze the entire dissociation processes of inhibitors from the binding pocket of protease at atomistic details. We found that the strength of hydrogen bond network between inhibitor and the protease takes crucial roles in the dissociation process. We showed that the hydrogen bond network in the cyclic urea inhibitors AHA001/XK263 is less stable than that of the approved inhibitor ABT538 because of their large differences in the structures of the networks. In the cyclic urea inhibitor bound complex, the hydrogen bonds often distribute at the flap tips and the active site. In contrast, there are additional accessorial hydrogen bonds formed at the lateral sides of the flaps and the active site in the ABT538 bound complex, which take crucial roles in stabilizing the hydrogen bond network. In addition, the water molecule W301 also plays important roles in stabilizing the hydrogen bond network through its flexible movement by acting as a collision buffer and helping the rebinding of hydrogen bonds at the flap tips. Because of its high stability, the hydrogen bond network of ABT538 complex can work together with the hydrophobic clusters to resist the dissociation, resulting in much lower dissociation rate constant than those of cyclic urea inhibitor complexes. This study may provide useful guidelines for design of novel potent inhibitors with optimized interactions.

[1]  S. Kuyucak,et al.  Application of Jarzynski's equality in simple versus complex systems , 2007 .

[2]  H. Gaub,et al.  Force-based analysis of multidimensional energy landscapes: application of dynamic force spectroscopy and steered molecular dynamics simulations to an antibody fragment-peptide complex. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  HIV-1 protease flaps spontaneously open and reclose in molecular dynamics simulations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Supot Hannongbua,et al.  Accurate prediction of protonation state as a prerequisite for reliable MM‐PB(GB)SA binding free energy calculations of HIV‐1 protease inhibitors , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  Gergely Tóth,et al.  Closing of the flaps of HIV-1 protease induced by substrate binding: a model of a flap closing mechanism in retroviral aspartic proteases. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[6]  G. Hummer,et al.  Free energy reconstruction from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Tavan,et al.  Ligand Binding: Molecular Mechanics Calculation of the Streptavidin-Biotin Rupture Force , 1996, Science.

[8]  Baohua Ji,et al.  Structure-based design of carbon nanotubes as HIV-1 protease inhibitors: atomistic and coarse-grained simulations. , 2010, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[9]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  HIV-1 protease flaps spontaneously close to the correct structure in simulations following manual placement of an inhibitor into the open state. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  G. Hummer,et al.  Theory, analysis, and interpretation of single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[12]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Free energy surfaces from single-molecule force spectroscopy. , 2005, Accounts of chemical research.

[14]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Nanoconfinement Controls Stiffness, Strength and Mechanical Toughness of Β-sheet Crystals in Silk , 2010 .

[15]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  A coarse grained model for the dynamics of flap opening in HIV-1 protease , 2005 .

[16]  C. Jarzynski,et al.  Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA folding free energies , 2005, Nature.

[17]  Robert A. Copeland,et al.  Enzymes: A Practical Introduction to Structure, Mechanism, and Data Analysis , 1996 .

[18]  PatrickY.-S. Lam,et al.  Rational design of potent, bioavailable, nonpeptide cyclic ureas as HIV protease inhibitors. , 1994, Science.

[19]  Kuan Wang,et al.  Coiled-coil nanomechanics and uncoiling and unfolding of the superhelix and alpha-helices of myosin. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Justin A. Lemkul,et al.  Assessing the stability of Alzheimer's amyloid protofibrils using molecular dynamics. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  Baohua Ji,et al.  Coarse-grained molecular dynamics of ligands binding into protein: The case of HIV-1 protease inhibitors. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Nanomechanical properties of vimentin intermediate filament dimers , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[23]  Chong-Hwan Chang,et al.  Molecular Recognition of Cyclic Urea HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Cooperative deformation of hydrogen bonds in beta-strands and beta-sheet nanocrystals. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  R. Rigler,et al.  Chemical Relaxation in Molecular Biology , 1977, Molecular Biology Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[26]  K. Schulten,et al.  Unfolding of titin immunoglobulin domains by steered molecular dynamics simulation. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[27]  A. Laio,et al.  Substrate binding mechanism of HIV-1 protease from explicit-solvent atomistic simulations. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  A. Skalka,et al.  The retroviral enzymes. , 1994, Annual review of biochemistry.

[29]  G. Torrie,et al.  Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .

[30]  K. Hwang,et al.  Coarse grained modeling of biopolymers and proteins: Methods and applications , 2009 .

[31]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  E. Evans,et al.  Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Peter V Coveney,et al.  Insights into a mutation-assisted lateral drug escape mechanism from the HIV-1 protease active site. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[34]  L J Davis,et al.  Active human immunodeficiency virus protease is required for viral infectivity. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  DNA translocation through a nanopore in a single-layered doped semiconductor membrane. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  J. Åqvist,et al.  Cyclic HIV-1 protease inhibitors derived from mannitol: synthesis, inhibitory potencies, and computational predictions of binding affinities. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[37]  W. Scott,et al.  Curling of flap tips in HIV-1 protease as a mechanism for substrate entry and tolerance of drug resistance. , 2000, Structure.

[38]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[39]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Intrinsic rates and activation free energies from single-molecule pulling experiments. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[40]  Jonathan W Essex,et al.  Conformational Motions of HIV-1 Protease Identified Using Reversible Digitally Filtered Molecular Dynamics. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[41]  J. Klafter,et al.  Beyond the conventional description of dynamic force spectroscopy of adhesion bonds , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  K Osterlund,et al.  Unexpected binding mode of a cyclic sulfamide HIV-1 protease inhibitor. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  Joanna Trylska,et al.  Binding Pathways of Ligands to HIV‐1 Protease: Coarse‐grained and Atomistic Simulations , 2007, Chemical biology & drug design.

[44]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Kinetics from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[46]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Hierarchies, multiple energy barriers, and robustness govern the fracture mechanics of alpha-helical and beta-sheet protein domains. , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  E D Blair,et al.  Human Immunodeficiency Virus , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Berk Hess,et al.  GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis , 2001 .

[49]  Emanuele Paci,et al.  Free energy for protein folding from nonequilibrium simulations using the Jarzynski equality. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[50]  Kuan Wang,et al.  Coiled-Coil Nanomechanics and Uncoiling and Unfolding of the Superhelix and α-Helices of Myosin , 2006 .

[51]  K. Ingold,et al.  Two-step binding mechanism for HIV protease inhibitors. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[52]  Sheh-Yi Sheu,et al.  Energetics of hydrogen bonds in peptides , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Berk Hess,et al.  P-LINCS:  A Parallel Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[54]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Asymptotic strength limit of hydrogen-bond assemblies in proteins at vanishing pulling rates. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[55]  Wesley Schaal,et al.  Relationships between structure and interaction kinetics for HIV-1 protease inhibitors. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[56]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Hierarchies, multiple energy barriers, and robustness govern the fracture mechanics of α-helical and β-sheet protein domains , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  A. Cavalli,et al.  Single-molecule pulling simulations can discern active from inactive enzyme inhibitors. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[58]  Joanna Trylska,et al.  HIV-1 protease substrate binding and product release pathways explored with coarse-grained molecular dynamics. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[59]  Charles J. Eyermann,et al.  NMR and X-ray Evidence That the HIV Protease Catalytic Aspartyl Groups Are Protonated in the Complex Formed by the Protease and a Non-Peptide Cyclic Urea-Based Inhibitor , 1994 .

[60]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[61]  S. Vasavanonda,et al.  ABT-538 is a potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus protease and has high oral bioavailability in humans. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Fast peptidyl cis-trans isomerization within the flexible Gly-rich flaps of HIV-1 protease. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[63]  I. Tinoco,et al.  Equilibrium Information from Nonequilibrium Measurements in an Experimental Test of Jarzynski's Equality , 2002, Science.

[64]  Araz Jakalian,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .

[65]  Kay-Eberhard Gottschalk,et al.  The effect of different force applications on the protein-protein complex Barnase-Barstar. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[66]  C. Jarzynski Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences , 1996, cond-mat/9610209.

[67]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. , 2005, Biophysical journal.