Classroom phonological awareness instruction and literacy outcomes in the first year of school.

PURPOSE Despite strong investment in raising literacy achievement for all children, significant inequalities in literacy outcomes continue to exist among some of the world's most advanced economies. This study investigated the influence of a short, intensive period of phonological awareness (PA) instruction implemented by classroom teachers on raising the literacy achievement of children with and without spoken language impairment (SLI). METHOD A quasi-experimental design was employed to measure the PA, reading, and spelling development of one hundred twenty-nine 5-year-olds. Thirty-four children received 10 weeks of PA instruction from their teachers. Ninety-five children continued with their usual reading program, which included phonics instruction but did not target PA. RESULTS Children who received PA instruction demonstrated superior literacy outcomes compared to children who followed the usual literacy curriculum. Children with SLI showed significant improvements in PA, reading, and spelling but had a different pattern of response to instruction compared to children with typical language. Importantly, the number of children experiencing word decoding difficulties at the end of the program was 26% among children who followed the usual literacy curriculum compared to 6% among children who received the PA instruction. IMPLICATIONS A short, intensive period of classroom PA instruction can raise the literacy profiles of children with and without spoken language difficulties.

[1]  J. Tomblin,et al.  Estimating the Risk of Future Reading Difficulties in Kindergarten Children: A Research-Based Model and Its Clinical Implementation. , 2001, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[2]  A Cornwall,et al.  The Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Reading and Spelling Achievement Eleven Years Later , 1995, Journal of learning disabilities.

[3]  P. Adamson The children left behind: a league table of inequality in child well-being in the world's rich countries. , 2010 .

[4]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers , 2001 .

[5]  Gail T. Gillon,et al.  Computer-Administrated Versus Paper-Based Assessment of School-Entry Phonological Awareness Ability , 2011 .

[6]  George Farkas,et al.  Matthew Effects for Whom? , 2008, Learning disability quarterly : journal of the Division for Children with Learning Disabilities.

[7]  Julia M. Carroll,et al.  Language and phonological skills in children at high risk of reading difficulties. , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[8]  Joyce McLeod,et al.  The Key Elements of Classroom Management: Managing Time and Space, Student Behavior, and Instructional Strategies , 2003 .

[9]  G. Gillon,et al.  Follow-up study investigating the benefits of phonological awareness intervention for children with spoken language impairment. , 2002, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[10]  Gail T. Gillon,et al.  Phonological Awareness: From Research to Practice , 2003 .

[11]  Gall T Gillon Facilitating phoneme awareness development in 3- and 4-year-old children with speech impairment. , 2005, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[12]  B. Dodd,et al.  Enhancing the phonological processing skills of children with specific reading disability. , 1997, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[13]  Jonathan Solity,et al.  Delivering phonological and phonics training within whole-class teaching. , 2008, The British journal of educational psychology.

[14]  J. Worthington Review: Neale Analysis of Reading Ability , 1999, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[15]  Sonia Q. Cabell,et al.  Language and literacy curriculum supplement for preschoolers who are academically at risk: a feasibility study. , 2010, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[16]  Bruce A. Murray,et al.  Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. , 1994 .

[17]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Longitudinal Studies of Phonological Processing and Reading , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: An Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Reading Achievement , 2000 .

[19]  T. Shanahan,et al.  Phonemic Awareness Instruction Helps Children Learn to Read: Evidence From the National Reading Panel's Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[20]  B. Dodd,et al.  Enhancing the phonological awareness and language skills of socially disadvantaged preschoolers: An interdisciplinary programme , 2007 .

[21]  P. Bryant,et al.  Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection , 1983, Nature.

[22]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[23]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Grouping Practices and Reading Outcomes for Students with Disabilities , 1999 .

[24]  Gary A. Troia,et al.  Phonological Awareness Intervention Research: A Critical Review of the Experimental Methodology , 1999 .

[25]  G. Gillon,et al.  The Efficacy of Phonological Awareness Intervention for Children With Spoken Language Impairment. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[26]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Exploring the Importance of Reading Programs for Kindergartners with Disabilities in Mainstream Classrooms , 2002 .

[27]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Reading, 2002. , 2003 .