Optimal Aircraft Performance during Microburst Encounter

The effects of microburst characteristics on the optimal penetration performance of jet transport and general aviation aircraft are presented. The purpose is to determine the best possible performance that can be achieved in a broad range of microbursts. A secondary goal is to illustrate good strategies for dealing with a range of microbursts during takeoff and landing. Over 1100 optimal trajectories were computed for two aircraft types flying through idealized microbursts using a Successive Quadratic Programs trajectory optimization algorithm. Contours of safety metrics are plotted as functions of the length scales, magnitudes, and locations of horizontal wind shears and vertical downdrafts. These performance contours show three length-scale regimes for optimal microburst penetration. At short length scales, hazards usually associated with gustiness predominate (e.g., high normal load factor, rotational upset). At intermediate length scales, a degraded ability to maintain flight path and/or vertical velocity poses the most serious threat. At very long microburst length scales, excessive touchdown velocities may result. The ability to transit a microburst successfully also varies strongly with microburst location. The results show that both aircraft types could penetrate some very severe microbursts if optimal control histories were followed. Nevertheless, these control strategies assume perfect prior knowledge of the wind, and practical limits to successful encounter with real-time control capabilities would be lower. The optimally controlled jet transport can successfully penetrate higher intensity microbursts than can the general aviation aircraft.

[1]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Optimal Recovery from Microburst Wind Shear , 1993 .

[2]  E. G. Rynaski,et al.  Control concepts for the alleviation of windshears and gusts , 1982 .

[3]  Yiyuan Zhao,et al.  Optimal paths through downbursts , 1990 .

[4]  Angelo Miele,et al.  Guidance strategies for near-optimum take-off performance in a windshear , 1986 .

[5]  R. E. Bach,et al.  The analysis of airline flight records for winds and performance with application to the Delta 191 accident , 1986 .

[6]  W. Frost,et al.  Pilot-aircraft system response to wind shear , 1980 .

[7]  Richard B. Bobbitt,et al.  Escape strategies for turboprop aircraft in microburst windshear , 1992 .

[8]  A. J. Ostroff,et al.  Total energy-rate feedback for automatic glide-slope tracking during wind-shear penetration , 1984 .

[9]  A. Miele,et al.  Optimization and acceleration guidance of flight trajectories in a windshear , 1987 .

[10]  Yiyuan Zhao,et al.  Approach guidance in a downburst , 1992 .

[11]  Mark L. Psiaki,et al.  Thrust laws for microburst wind shear penetration , 1992 .

[12]  Robert F. Stengel Optimal control laws for microburst encounter , 1986 .

[13]  A. Miele,et al.  Optimization and Guidance of Penetration Landing Trajectories in a Windshear , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[14]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Optimal Flight Paths Through Microburst Wind Profiles , 1986 .

[15]  D. C. Freeman,et al.  Full-scale wind-tunnel investigation of the static longitudinal and lateral characteristics of a light single-engine low- wing airplane , 1970 .

[16]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Analysis of aircraft control strategies for microburst encounter. [low altitude wind shear , 1984 .

[17]  Robert K. Heffley,et al.  Simulation and Analysis of Wind Shear Hazard. , 1977 .

[18]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Target pitch angle for the microburst escape maneuver , 1993 .

[19]  A. Miele,et al.  Overview of optimal trajectories for flight in a windshear , 1989 .

[20]  A. Miele,et al.  Optimal take-off trajectories in the presence of windshear , 1986 .