The effects of pay level on organization‐based self‐esteem and performance: A field study

Most compensation managers implicitly assume (or perhaps hope) that high pay levels will maintain and enhance future performance. To date, this assumption has been largely untested. Given the importance of pay level and the large expense that pay represents to most organizations, understanding how and why pay level influences the behaviour of employees in organizations is an important question. The purpose of this study is to examine the motivational effects of pay level on employee performance. To examine these issues, we collected field study data from a variety of sources, at three different times, and assessed the effects of employee pay level on subsequent self-esteem and performance. Specifically, we hypothesized that the effects of pay level on performance would be mediated by pay level effects on organization-based self-esteem. We base this hypothesis on the premise that level of pay within an organization communicates a sense of how much the organization values an employee and thus affects employee organization-based self-esteem which, in turn, enhances job performance. After controlling for organization tenure, and previous pay change, results supported a mediated model that suggests that pay level affects employee self-esteem, which in turn, affects employee performance.

[1]  S. Coopersmith,et al.  The antecedents of self-esteem. , 1969 .

[2]  Darrell J. Cira,et al.  Competency-Based Pay: A Concept in Evolution , 1998 .

[3]  Michael M. Harris,et al.  A longitudinal examination of a merit pay system : Relationships among performance ratings, merit increases, and total pay increases , 1998 .

[4]  Abraham K. Korman,et al.  Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. , 1970 .

[5]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Chronic self-esteem as a moderator of performance consequences of expected pay , 1974 .

[7]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Employee Compensation: Research and Practice , 1992 .

[8]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? , 2002 .

[9]  Shrauger Js Self-esteem and reactions to being observed by others. , 1972 .

[10]  Nathaniel Branden,et al.  Self-Esteem At Work , 1998 .

[11]  Amy E. Mickel,et al.  The meaning of money: An individual-difference perspective , 1999 .

[12]  J. S. Shrauger Self-esteem and reactions to being observed by others. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Wage Inequities, Productivity and Work Quality , 1963 .

[14]  Abraham K. Korman,et al.  Hypothesis of Work Behavior Revisited and an Extension , 1976 .

[15]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy within the Organizational Context , 1998 .

[16]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Strategic reward systems. , 1992 .

[17]  C. Parsons,et al.  Contingent Pay Systems and Job Performance Feedback , 1995 .

[18]  Robert L. Dipboye,et al.  A critical review of Korman's self-consistency theory of work motivation and occupational choice , 1977 .

[19]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All , 2000 .

[20]  Reese Baltes The Complex Nature of Unique and Shared Effects in Hierarchical Linear Regression : Implications for Developmental Psychology , 2001 .

[21]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. , 1991 .

[22]  J. Hattie,et al.  Relationships between self-concept and achievement , 1985 .

[23]  Gretchen Peterson,et al.  IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN SOCIAL EXCHANGE , 2003 .

[24]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[25]  U. Kleinbeck,et al.  The Reflection Theory on Compensation , 2001 .

[26]  L. Taylor,et al.  Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory , 1989 .

[27]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy , 2003 .

[28]  Phyllis Tharenou,et al.  Employee self-esteem: A review of the literature , 1979 .

[29]  R. Kanter From status to contribution: some organizational implications of the changing basis for pay. , 1987, Personnel.

[30]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Procedural fairness and self-esteem , 1993 .

[31]  T. Liang Antecedents of Organization-Based Self-Esteem: An Empirical Study in Singapore , 1995 .

[32]  R. Frank Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status , 1986 .

[33]  J. Shaw,et al.  Reactions to merit pay increases: a longitudinal test of a signal sensitivity perspective. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  G. Homans,et al.  Social Behaviour, Its Elementary Forms , 1962 .

[35]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[36]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  L. Porter,et al.  Alternative Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off? , 1997 .

[38]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[39]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions , 2002 .

[40]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  Pay fairness and employee outcomes: Exacerbation and attenuation effects of financial need , 2001 .

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  J. Brockner The relation of trait self-esteem and positive inequity to productivity , 1985 .

[43]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[44]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships , 2000 .

[45]  Carolyn Wiley,et al.  What motivates employees according to over 40 years of motivation surveys , 1997 .

[46]  S. Aryee,et al.  Work and nonwork influences on the career satisfaction of dual-earner couples. , 1996 .

[47]  W. Darity,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL AND HUMAN CAPITAL ON WAGES , 1997 .

[48]  Deborah E. Rupp,et al.  The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice , 2002 .

[49]  J. Pfeffer Understanding organizations: Concepts and controversies. , 1998 .

[50]  J. Brockner Self-Esteem at Work: Research, Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[51]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  The role of financial compensation in industrial motivation. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[53]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  Organization-Based Self-Esteem: Construct Definition, Measurement, And Validation , 1989 .

[54]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Performance in Organizations: Determinants and Appraisal. , 1973 .

[55]  J. Shaw,et al.  Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. , 1998 .

[56]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[57]  Joel Brockner,et al.  High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations : An attributional analysis , 2003 .

[58]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity , 1996 .

[59]  Robert L. Heneman Merit Pay: Linking Pay Increases to Performance Ratings , 1992 .

[60]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Collectivism, propensity to trust and self‐esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non‐work setting , 2000 .

[61]  H. Thierry Payment: Which Meanings Are Rewarding? , 1992 .

[62]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem : Different concepts different outcomes , 1995 .

[63]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Compensation in organizations : current research and practice , 2002 .

[64]  LUMP‐SUM BONUS SATISFACTION: TESTING THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF A NEW PAY SATISFACTION DIMENSION , 2000 .