STRATEGIES FOR MANAGING STATISTICAL COMPLEXITY WITH NEW SOFTWARE TOOLS

SUMMARY New software tools for data analysis provide rich opportunities for representing and understanding data. However, little research has been done on how learners use these tools to think about data, nor how that affects teaching. This paper describes several ways that learners use new software tools to deal with variability in analyzing data, specifically in the context of comparing groups. The two methods we discuss are 1) reducing the apparent variability in a data set by grouping the values using numerical bins or cut points and 2) using proportions to interpret the relationship between bin size and group size. This work is based on our observations of middle- and high-school teachers in a professional development seminar, as well as of students in these teachers’ classrooms, and in a 13-week sixth grade teaching experiment. We conclude with remarks on the implications of these uses of new software tools for research and teaching.

[1]  Arthur Bakker,et al.  Design research in statistics education , 2004 .

[2]  Edward S. Mooney,et al.  Refining a Framework on Middle School Students' Statistical Thinking. , 2001 .

[3]  James J. Kaput,et al.  Authentic Inquiry With Data: Critical Barriers to Classroom Implementation , 1992 .

[4]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Individual and Collective Mathematical Development: The Case of Statistical Data Analysis. , 1999 .

[5]  Susan Jo Russell,et al.  Children's Concepts of Average and Representativeness. , 1995 .

[6]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Data Analysis as the Search for Signals in Noisy Processes. , 2002 .

[7]  Carl Lee,et al.  STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF HISTOGRAMS: A STUMBLING STONE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTUITIONS ABOUT VARIATION , 2002 .

[8]  J. Clement Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and model viability , 2000 .

[9]  Andee Rubin,et al.  INTERACTIVE VISUALIZATIONS OF STATISTICAL RELATIONSHIPS: WHAT DO WE GAIN? , 2002 .

[10]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[11]  J. Shaughnessy Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. , 1992 .

[12]  Eleanor Duckworth,et al.  "The having of wonderful ideas" and other essays on teaching and learning , 1987 .

[13]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  STUDENTS' USE OF MODAL CLUMPS TO SUMMARIZE DATA , 2002 .

[14]  Deborah Schifter Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Lessons in/from the Domain of Fractions. Center for the Development of Teaching Paper Series. , 1997 .

[15]  Clifford Konold,et al.  ALTERNATIVES TO SCATTERPLOTS , 2002 .

[16]  D. Ball With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Learning About Statistical Covariation , 2003 .

[18]  C. KONOLD,et al.  STUDENTS ANALYZING DATA : RESEARCH OF CRITICAL BARRIERS , 1998 .

[19]  Arthur Bakker,et al.  LEARNING TO REASON ABOUT DISTRIBUTION , 2004 .

[20]  Judith T. Sowder Middle Grade Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge and Its Relationship to Instruction: A Research Monograph , 1998 .

[21]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Working on the Inside: Using One’s Own Practice as a Site for Studying Teaching and Learning , 2000 .

[22]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[23]  Robbie Case,et al.  Implications of Developmental Psychology for the Design of Effective Instruction , 1978 .

[24]  D. Ball Research on Teaching Mathematics: Making Subject Matter Knowledge Part of the Equation. , 1988 .

[25]  Patrick W Thompson,et al.  Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statistical inference , 2002 .

[26]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Intuitions About Sample Size: The Empirical Law of Large Numbers , 1997 .

[27]  Jane Watson,et al.  The Beginning of Statistical Inference: Comparing two Data Sets , 1998 .

[28]  Jane Watson,et al.  Developing Concepts of Sampling , 2000 .

[29]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Learning Mathematics for Teaching: Results from California's Mathematics Professional Development Institutes , 2004 .

[30]  Edward S. Mooney,et al.  A Framework for Characterizing Middle School Students' Statistical Thinking , 2002 .

[31]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements , 2000 .

[32]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[33]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking , 2006 .

[34]  Jere Confrey,et al.  The Development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics , 1995 .