Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society

The term responsible (research and) innovation has gained increasing EU policy relevance in the last two years, in particular within the European Commission's Science in Society programme, in the context of the Horizon 2020 Strategy. We provide a brief historical overview of the concept, and identify three distinct features that are emerging from associated discourses. The first is an emphasis on the democratic governance of the purposes of research and innovation and their orientation towards the 'right impacts'. The second is responsiveness, emphasising the integration and institutionalisation of established approaches of anticipation, reflection and deliberation in and around research and innovation, influencing the direction of these and associated policy. The third concerns the framing of responsibility itself in the context of research and innovation as collective activities with uncertain and unpredictable consequences. Finally, we reflect on possible motivations for responsible innovation itself. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Bernard Williams,et al.  Moral Luck: Moral luck , 1981 .

[2]  Helge Toutenburg,et al.  The Social Control of Technology , 1982 .

[3]  H. Jonas,et al.  The Imperative of Responsibility , 1984 .

[4]  T. Beckett.  Innovation in the 21st century , 1987 .

[5]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk , 1995 .

[6]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[7]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[8]  Henry S. Richardson,et al.  Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility , 1999, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[9]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Wising up : the public and new technologies , 2000 .

[10]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[11]  T. Hellström,et al.  Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation , 2003 .

[12]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Co-responsibility for research integrity , 2003, Science and engineering ethics.

[13]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[14]  Heather Douglas.  THE MORAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF SCIENTISTS (TENSIONS BETWEEN AUTONOMY AND RESPONSIBILITY) , 2003 .

[15]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[16]  Luigi Pellizzoni,et al.  Responsibility and Environmental Governance , 2004 .

[17]  A. Stirling.  Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology , 2005 .

[18]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[19]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions , 2007 .

[20]  Jack Stilgoe.  Nanodialogues: Experiments in public engagement with science , 2007 .

[21]  Richard A. L. Jones,et al.  When it pays to ask the public. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[22]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Lab‐scale intervention , 2009, EMBO reports.

[23]  Richard Owen,et al.  Strategic Approaches for the Management of Environmental Risk Uncertainties Posed by Nanomaterials , 2009 .

[24]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty , 2009 .

[25]  Guibin Jiang,et al.  Perspectives on the inclusion of perfluorooctane sulfonate into the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Jameson M. Wetmore,et al.  Researching and Teaching the Ethics and Social Implications of Emerging Technologies in the Laboratory , 2009 .

[27]  David Baxter,et al.  Beyond regulation: risk pricing and responsible innovation. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Risto Karinen,et al.  Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology , 2009 .

[29]  Sabine Maasen,et al.  Governing Future Technologies : Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime , 2010 .

[30]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  Unlocking the Language of Structured Securities , 2010 .

[31]  Richard Owen,et al.  Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  Claire Marris,et al.  Open Engagement: Exploring Public Participation in the Biosciences , 2010, PLoS biology.

[33]  A New Mandate? Research Policy in a Technological Society , 2011 .

[34]  Richard Owen,et al.  Environmental science: Good governance for geoengineering , 2011, Nature.

[35]  Barbara Adam,et al.  Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility , 2011 .

[36]  R. V. Schomberg.  Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields , 2011 .

[37]  R. V. Schomberg.  Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .

[38]  Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst,et al.  Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload , 2011, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[39]  Robert Lee,et al.  Look at Mother Nature on the Run in the 21st Century: Responsibility, Research and Innovation , 2012, Transnational Environmental Law.

[40]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Editors’ Overview: Moral Responsibility in Technology and Engineering , 2012, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[41]  Niels Mejlgaard,et al.  Locating science in society across Europe: Clusters and consequences , 2012 .

[42]  M. Armstrong,et al.  Towards a practical approach to responsible innovation in finance: New Product Committees revisited , 2012 .

[43]  M. Roco.  National Nanotechnology Initiative , 2012 .

[44]  Marc Lenglet,et al.  Responsible innovation in finance: directions and implications , 2013 .

[45]  D. Guston.  “Daddy, Can I Have a Puddle Gator?”: Creativity, Anticipation, and Responsible Innovation , 2013 .

[46]  Arie Rip,et al.  Responsible Innovation: Multi‐Level Dynamics and Soft Intervention Practices , 2013 .

[47]  Kathy Sykes,et al.  Responsible Innovation – Opening Up Dialogue and Debate , 2013 .

[48]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[49]  D. Schuurbiers,et al.  Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations , 2013 .

[50]  R. V. Schomberg.  A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[51]  M. Gorman,et al.  A framework for responsible innovation , 2013 .