When memory shifts toward more typical category exemplars: accentuation effects in the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces.

In 4 studies, the authors examined the impact of categorization on the recollection of ethnically ambiguous faces. Participants were presented with faces lying at various locations on mixed-race continua (i.e., Caucasian-North African and Caucasian-Asian faces were used as source images in a morphing program). In all studies, the prevalence of exclusive ethnic features in a face distorted participants' recollections of the face toward faces more typical of the category. Specifically, the recollection of 30% North African (or 30% Asian) faces shifted toward Caucasian source faces, whereas the recollection of 70% North African (or 70% Asian) faces shifted toward North African (Asian) source faces. Memory distortions did not emerge for extremely ambiguous (50%) faces and proved larger on mixed-race than same-race continua (Studies 3 and 4). Memory distortions also emerged with high levels of confidence. The authors elaborate on the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

[1]  R. Malpass,et al.  Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads , 1998 .

[2]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[3]  Elizabeth F Loftus,et al.  Leading questions and the eyewitness report , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[5]  Y. Trope,et al.  The perceptual and inferential effects of situational inducements on dispositional attribution. , 1988 .

[6]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[7]  Keith B. Maddox,et al.  Cognitive Representations of Black Americans: Reexploring the Role of Skin Tone , 2002 .

[8]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Constructive biases in social judgment: experiments on the self-verification of question contents. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[10]  G. Wells The Psychology of Lineup Identifications1 , 1984 .

[11]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[12]  T G F Gray,et al.  5 – COMPUTER SOFTWARE , 1992 .

[13]  Shaw,et al.  Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. , 1996 .

[14]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[15]  P. Quinn Perceptual reference points for form and orientation in young infants: Anchors or magnets? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Effects of emotion concepts on perceptual memory for emotional expressions. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Y. Trope Identification and Inferential Processes in Dispositional Attribution. , 1986 .

[18]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[19]  C. Dweck,et al.  Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding. , 1999 .

[20]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Distortions of memory , 2000 .

[22]  Y. Trope,et al.  Perceptual and inferential determinants of behavior-correspondent attributions , 1989 .

[23]  Jennifer L. Eberhardt,et al.  Believing Is Seeing: The Effects of Racial Labels and Implicit Beliefs on Face Perception , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Creating memory illusions: Expectancy-based processing and the generation of false memories , 2002, Memory.

[26]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. , 2001 .

[27]  E. Rosch Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  E. Loftus,et al.  Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory , 1974 .

[29]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Illusions of gender: Stereotypes evoke false memories , 2001 .

[31]  J. Read,et al.  Effects of Uniqueness, Sex of Subject, and Sex of Photograph on Facial Recognition , 1974 .

[32]  P. Kuhl Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  W. Brewer,et al.  The nature and functions of schemas. , 1984 .

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[35]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[36]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces , 1986, Perception.

[37]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[38]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  K C Klauer,et al.  Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Riitta Jääskeläinen,et al.  Who Said What? , 2003 .

[41]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Olivier Corneille,et al.  On the Role of Familiarity with Units of Measurement in Categorical Accentuation: Tajfel and Wilkes (1963) Revisited and Replicated , 2002, Psychological science.

[43]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[45]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  D. Levin,et al.  Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  D. Judges Two Cheers for the Department of Justice's Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement , 2000 .

[48]  M. Brewer,et al.  What are we really priming? Cue-based versus category-based processing of facial stimuli. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[50]  Ian Begg,et al.  Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth , 1992 .

[51]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[52]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Classification and quantitative judgement. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[53]  Charles M Judd,et al.  The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: judging by features and categories. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[55]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .