Risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension in the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for failure of transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension (SSUS) in the treatment of uterine prolapse and to examine methods for controlling these risk factors. METHODS Sixty patients with second degree uterine prolapse or greater were included in this 2-stage study, with 33 in the risk factor assessment and 27 in the clinical study of a modified treatment to eliminate identified risk factors. Patients were followed for at least 5 years. The first part of the study evaluated the risk factors for operative failure and the efficacy of the operative procedure. The second part of the study evaluated a modified treatment plan to eliminate risk factors identified in the first part of the study. RESULTS The failure rate for those with an elongated cervix (3 of 4, 75%) and those with third degree uterine prolapse (3 of 4, 75%) was significantly higher than for patients without either of these risk factors (6.9%, 2/29) [p = 0.007]. Concomitant partial trachelectomy for those with elongated cervix significantly reduced the failure rate from 75% to 0% (0/7) [p = 0.024]. In the risk factor study, SSUS was successful in 84.8% (28/33) of patients. In the clinical study of modified therapy to prevent significant risk factors, the success rate was 96.3% (26/27). CONCLUSIONS This study found that an elongated cervix and third degree uterine prolapse were the 2 main risk factors for recurrent uterine prolapse after SSUS. Concomitant partial trachelectomy as an adjuvant treatment of SSUS for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse in patients with an elongated cervix significantly reduces the rate of failure in these patients.

[1]  C. Klutke,et al.  Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for treatment of vaginal prolapse. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[2]  S. Smilen,et al.  Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  S. Kovac,et al.  Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  V. M. Joshi A new technique of uterine suspension to pectineal ligaments in the management of uterovaginal prolapse. , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  M. Riggs,et al.  Preoperative and postoperative analysis of site‐specific pelvic support defects in 81 women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  S. Cruikshank,et al.  Sacrospinous ligament fixation at the time of transvaginal hysterectomy. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  D. Richardson,et al.  Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women. , 1989, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[8]  R. Hebertson,et al.  An anatomic evaluation of the sacrospinous ligament colpopexy. , 1989, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[9]  D. Nichols Sacrospinous fixation for massive eversion of the vagina. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  W. F. Baden,et al.  Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. , 1972, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  D. Nichols,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Inversion , 1971, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  J. O'leary,et al.  The extended Manchester operation. A review of 289 cases. , 1970, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  W. F. Shaw The treatment of prolapsus uteri, with special reference to the Manchester operation of colporrhaphy , 1933 .