Physical and Functional Modularity of the Protein Network in Yeast*

While protein-protein interactions have been studied largely as a network graph without physicality, here we analyze two protein complex data sets of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to relate physical and functional modularity to the network topology. We study for the first time the number of different protein complexes as a function of the protein complex size and find that it follows an exponential decay with a characteristic number of about 7. This reflects the dynamics of complex formation and dissociation in the cell. The analysis of the protein usage by complexes shows an extensive sharing of subunits that is due to the particular organization of the proteome into physical complexes and functional modules. This promiscuity accounts for the high clustering in the protein network graph. Our results underscore the need to include the information contained in observed protein complexes into protein network analyses.

[1]  S. Huang,et al.  Genomics, complexity and drug discovery: insights from Boolean network models of cellular regulation. , 2001, Pharmacogenomics.

[2]  D. Fell,et al.  The small world inside large metabolic networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[4]  B. Schwikowski,et al.  A network of protein–protein interactions in yeast , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[6]  L. Loew,et al.  Systems Analysis of Ran Transport , 2002, Science.

[7]  H. Mewes,et al.  Overview of the yeast genome. , 1997, Nature.

[8]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[9]  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks Supporting Online Material , 2002 .

[10]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[13]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[14]  E. Koonin,et al.  The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution , 2002, Nature.

[15]  B. Snel,et al.  The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[17]  A. Wagner The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.