Reinforcement of Linear Structure using Parametrized Relaxation Labeling

An approach for reinforcing underlying linear structure while suppressing unwanted noise, useful for analysis of medical images, has been presented. The method utilizes principles previously presented with regard to relaxation labeling processes, but differ in that the label set is now considered to be continuous and the distribution of label preference values for each object (pixel) parametrized by a single vector. Due to this parametrization, the total number of computations per pixel in the new method is now dependent only on the number of neighbors used in the computation, and not on the number of labels as well, as in previous methods. Thus, for a general reinforcement problem with m labels and n neighbors being considered for each pixel, the time complexity per object (pixel) per iteration goes as O (nm2) for the prototypical algorithm (e.g. (Zucker, et. al., 1977)) and is reduced by the approach presented here to O (n). The method uses a new approach for deciding local neighborhood influence and making a decision between reinforced linear structure with some magnitude and orientation and a no-structure condition based on the nonlinear (sigmoidal) thresholding of a linear vector sum. It should be noted that there is a similarity between this sigmoidal thresholding function and similar functions used in artificial neural networks (Hopfield, 1984). Ongoing work is being performed to further investigate such overlap. Also, it is planned to extend the approach in several ways. These include the ability to reinforce co-circularity, as well as to reinforce underlying planar structure by updating surface normals in true three-dimensional diagnostic imagery.

[1]  Owen Robert Mitchell,et al.  Precision Edge Contrast and Orientation Estimation , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Improving Consistency and Reducing Ambiguity in Stochastic Labeling: An Optimization Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Relaxation labeling using continuous label sets , 1989, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Scene Labeling by Relaxation Operations , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Structural Saliency: The Detection Of Globally Salient Structures using A Locally Connected Network , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  HYPER: A New Approach for the Recognition and Positioning of Two-Dimensional Objects , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  On the Foundations of Relaxation Labeling Processes , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  An Application of Relaxation Labeling to Line and Curve Enhancement , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[11]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  The Organization Of Curve Detection: Coarse Tangent Fields And Fine Spline Coverings , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[13]  Olivier Faugeras,et al.  Maintaining representations of the environment of a mobile robot , 1988, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..