Challenges in Commercializing Biomimetic Membranes

The discovery of selective water channel proteins—aquaporins—has prompted growing interest in using these proteins, as the building blocks for designing new types of membranes. However, as with any other new and potentially disruptive technology, barriers for successful market entry exist. One category includes customer-related barriers, which can be influenced to some extent. Another category includes market-technical-related barriers, which can be very difficult to overcome by an organization/company aiming at successfully introducing their innovation on the market—in particular if both the organization and the technology are at early stages. Often, one faces barriers from both these categories at the same time, which makes it necessary to gain insight of the particular market when introducing a new innovative product. In this review we present the basic concepts and discuss some of these barriers and challenges associated with introducing biomimetic aquaporin membranes. These include technical issues in membrane production and product testing. Then we discuss possible business models for introducing new technologies in general, followed by a presentation of beach-head market segments relevant for biomimetic aquaporin membranes.

[1]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Biomimetic aquaporin membranes coming of age , 2015 .

[2]  C. Nielsen Biomimetic membranes for sensor and separation applications , 2009, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[3]  Brandon W. Taylor,et al.  Use of Aquaporins to Achieve Needed Water Purity on the International Space Station for the Extravehicular Mobility Unit Space Suit System , 2012 .

[4]  Sabine Kuester,et al.  Entry Strategy for Radical Product Innovations: A Conceptual Model and Propositional Inventory , 2002 .

[5]  Pu Chen,et al.  Membranes , 1992, Current Opinion in Cell Biology.

[6]  Claus Hélix-Nielsen,et al.  Recombinant Production of Human Aquaporin-1 to an Exceptional High Membrane Density in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  B. Bruggen,et al.  Enhanced performance of a biomimetic membrane for Na2CO3 crystallization in the scenario of CO2 capture , 2016 .

[8]  Irena Petrinić,et al.  A feasibility study of ultrafiltration/reverse osmosis (UF/RO)-based wastewater treatment and reuse in the metal finishing industry , 2015 .

[9]  Richard M. Lueptow,et al.  Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes. , 2005, Journal of membrane science.

[10]  M. Asce,et al.  ISSUES IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION BY MUNICIPAL DRINKING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[11]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2012, Water research.

[12]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[13]  G. Calamita,et al.  Systems for Production of Proteins for Biomimetic Membrane Devices , 2011 .

[14]  J. L. Amprako The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World , 2016 .

[15]  Tom Van Gerven,et al.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MEMBRANE-BASED TECHNOLOGIES FOR CO2 CAPTURE , 2012 .

[16]  M. Porter How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy , 1989 .

[17]  J. East Membrane structural biology with biochemical and biophysical foundations , 2008 .

[18]  B. Bruggen,et al.  Use of biomimetic forward osmosis membrane for trace organics removal , 2015 .

[19]  Chavan Rb Towards Zero Liquid Discharge , 2017 .

[20]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Synthesis of robust and high-performance aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes by interfacial polymerization-membrane preparation and RO performance characterization , 2012 .