Sparse seismic wavefield sampling

Abstract Seismic acquisition is a trade-off between image quality and cost. While there is an increasing need for higher quality images due to the more complex geologic settings of reservoirs, there is also a strong desire to reduce the cost and cycle time of seismic acquisition. Meeting these conflicting ambitions requires creative solutions. New hardware developments aim at improving survey efficiency and image quality. To optimally leverage new hardware and maximize survey efficiency, their development should go together with new insights gained from sparse sampling. Sparse sampling combines efficient data acquisition with the reconstruction of a signal by finding its coefficients as the solution of an underdetermined system. Greater survey efficiency results from compression during acquisition. For seismic wavefield sampling, the compression can take place in time, space, or both. Compression in time can be achieved by letting shot-records overlap, as in simultaneous-source acquisition for example. Co...

[1]  Michael Elad,et al.  Sparse and Redundant Representations - From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing , 2010 .

[2]  X. Campman,et al.  Deterministically Subsampled Acquisition Geometries for Optimal Reconstruction , 2016 .

[3]  Robert Olson,et al.  Increasing the efficiency of seismic data acquisition via compressive sensing , 2014 .

[4]  J. Tropp On the conditioning of random subdictionaries , 2008 .

[5]  Bin Guo,et al.  Coherence, Compressive Sensing, and Random Sensor Arrays , 2011, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[6]  A. Papoulis,et al.  Generalized sampling expansion , 1977 .

[7]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[8]  Ali Özbek,et al.  Crossline wavefield reconstruction from multicomponent streamer data: Part 2 — Joint interpolation and 3D up/down separation by generalized matching pursuit , 2010 .

[9]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Randomized marine acquisition with compressive sampling matrices , 2012 .

[10]  Geert Leus,et al.  Deterministic fourier-based dictionary design for sparse reconstruction , 2016, 2016 IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM).

[11]  Dustin G. Mixon,et al.  Full Spark Frames , 2011, 1110.3548.

[12]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Beyond worst-case reconstruction in deterministic compressed sensing , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[13]  Farrokh Marvasti,et al.  Deterministic Construction of Binary, Bipolar, and Ternary Compressed Sensing Matrices , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  A. C. Raptis,et al.  Optimized compressive sampling for passive millimeter-wave imaging. , 2012, Applied optics.

[15]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Achieving the Welch bound with difference sets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Farrokh Marvasti,et al.  OFDM pilot allocation for sparse channel estimation , 2011, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[17]  X. Campman,et al.  Joint up/down decomposition and reconstruction using three‐component streamers with or without ghost model: the sampling theory , 2017 .

[18]  Lloyd R. Welch,et al.  Lower bounds on the maximum cross correlation of signals (Corresp.) , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Recovery of Blended Data - A Sparse Coding Approach for Seismic Acquisition , 2016 .

[20]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Randomized sampling and sparsity: Getting more information from fewer samples , 2010 .