Unpacking ostensive and performative aspects of organisational routines in the context of monitoring systems: A critical realist approach

Drawing on the theory of organisational routines as generative systems, we deploy a critical realist approach based on Searle's philosophy of language to analyse the generative mechanisms that specify the pre-conditions for recognisable, repetitive patterns of interdependent activities. Using the example of the organisational routines implemented in Germany to monitor the allocation and disbursement of the European Social Fund, we contend that constitutive rules of the type ''X counts as Y in context C'' are at the very centre of organisational routines. Such rules consist of generative mechanisms that account for the emergence of the ostensive aspects of organisational routines out of artefacts and/or procedures in a social structure of power relations. We further claim that, far from being proxies for the ostensive aspects of routines, artefacts whether tangible or intangible are instantiations of such ostensive aspects on a par with any other performative aspects of routines. On this basis, a re-conceptualisation and a re-labelling of the ostensive and performative aspects of routines are proposed. The former are the result of the activation of systems of constitutive rules, i.e. actual routines in critical realist terminology, the latter are patterns of interdependent activities instantiating the ostensive aspects of routines, i.e. empirical routines in critical realist terminology. Implications for theory and practice are discussed by developing a model of organisational routines that interweaves extant research streams.

[1]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  The firm as an epistemic community: The knowledge based view revisited , 2010 .

[2]  Josef Moural Searle’S Theory of Institutional Facts: A Program of Critical Revision , 2002 .

[3]  John R. Searle What is an institution? , 2005, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[4]  Jochen Runde,et al.  On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function , 2009 .

[5]  Markus C. Becker 1 The past, present and future of organizational routines: introduction to the Handbook of Organizational Routines , 2008 .

[6]  Philip J. Dobson The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[7]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Experience with a structure, process and outcome framework for evaluating an information system , 1994 .

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[10]  Margaret S. Archer,et al.  Realist social theory: The morphogenetic cycle , 1997 .

[11]  Kamal Munir,et al.  On Technological Objects and the Adoption of Technological Product Innovations: Rules, Routines and the Transition from Analogue Photography to Digital Imaging , 2008 .

[12]  M. Egidi,et al.  The emergence of path-dependent behaviors in cooperative contexts , 1997 .

[13]  J. Kallinikos Farewell to constructivism: technology and context-embedded action , 2004 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[15]  G. Hodgson The Concept of a Routine , 2004 .

[16]  B. Gilad,et al.  Handbook of behavioral economics , 1986 .

[17]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Organizational routines : advancing empirical research , 2009 .

[18]  A. Ron,et al.  Regression Analysis and the Philosophy of Social Science , 2002 .

[19]  J. Searle,et al.  An Illuminating Exchange The Construction of Social Reality , 2003 .

[20]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[21]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Introduction: Realism in the social sciences , 2013 .

[22]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[23]  Markus C. Becker Handbook of Organizational Routines , 2010 .

[24]  J. Searle The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[25]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[26]  R. Bhaskar A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[27]  John R. Searle,et al.  Social ontology , 2006 .

[28]  Markus C. Becker Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[29]  Peter Kroes,et al.  The dual nature of technical artefacts , 2006 .

[30]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Organizational Character: On the Regeneration of Camp Poplar Grove , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[31]  D. MacKenzie Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets , 2006, Journal of the History of Economic Thought.

[32]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[33]  Luciana D'Adderio The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics , 2008 .

[34]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The order of technology: Complexity and control in a connected world , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[36]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[37]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[38]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[39]  John Mingers,et al.  Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[40]  Benedicte Reynaud,et al.  The void at the heart of rules: Routines in the context of rule-following , 2005 .

[41]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Governing Through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice , 2010 .

[42]  Steve Fleetwood,et al.  Causal Laws, Functional Relations and Tendencies , 2001 .

[43]  Robin Williams,et al.  Technology Choice and its Performance : Toward a Sociology of Software Package Procurement , 2009 .

[44]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[45]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[46]  John R. Searle Language and social ontology , 2008 .

[47]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  The transformation of technological regimes , 2003 .

[49]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[50]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes , 1995 .

[51]  Mike Hales,et al.  The Practice of Routines and Representations in Design and Development , 2009 .

[52]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[53]  W. Sewell A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Markus C. Becker The concept of routines: some clarifications , 2005 .

[55]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Comparing Organizational Routines as Recurrent Patterns of Action , 2010 .

[56]  Anat Rafaeli,et al.  Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[57]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  The foundation is solid, if you know where to look: comment on Felin and Foss , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[58]  Matthew Longshore Smith,et al.  Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[59]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[60]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter , 2010, First Monday.

[61]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  Institutions and Individuals: Interaction and Evolution , 2007 .

[62]  J. Searle Mind, Language, And Society: Philosophy In The Real World , 1998 .

[63]  Federico Iannacci,et al.  When is an information infrastructure? Investigating the emergence of public sector information infrastructures , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Luciana D'Adderio Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[65]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[66]  T. Knudsen,et al.  Organizational Routines in Evolutionary Theory , 2007 .

[67]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[68]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[69]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Advancing Empirical Research on Organizational Routines: Introduction , 2009 .

[70]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[71]  Jack Vromen,et al.  Routines as multilevel mechanisms , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[72]  Günther Grewendorf,et al.  Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality Discussions with John R. Searle , 2002 .

[73]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .