A Year in the Life

Abstract Maine was the first state to put laptops in the hands of an entire grade of students. This interpretive case study of two middle school science-math teachers was driven by the general question: Given ubiquitous computing, how do teachers use computers in constructing curriculum and delivering instruction? Specifically, the researchers sought to examine the facilitators and barriers for teachers in using laptops in the classroom. Using qualitative methods, the researchers collected data during the first year of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative (MLTI). Differential effects of one-to-one computing on each teacher were found along two dimensions: the effect of technical technological issues, and the educational effect of technology policies. For both teachers, the effects were deeply altered by the teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning, which in turn affected their ultimate choices of how their time (and their students’ time) was spent. This empirical study offers a preliminary analysis and can be used both as a reflective mirror for practitioners and as a guide for administrators and teacher educators.

[1]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Identifying Teacher, School and District Characteristics Associated with Elementary Teachers' Use of Technology:A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[2]  David L. Silvernail,et al.  The Impact of Maine's One-to-One Laptop Program on Middle School Teachers and Students , 2004 .

[3]  K. Sahl,et al.  Tracing Teachers’ Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture , 2002 .

[4]  B. Berg.  Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[5]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[6]  Shiang-Kwei Wang,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PORTABLE TECHNOLOGIES ON TEACHING AND LEARNING: YEAR FOUR REPORT , 2003 .

[7]  Phillip D. McCarthy,et al.  Final Report of the Task Force on the Maine Learning Technology Endowment , 2001 .

[8]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[9]  Fairman,et al.  Trading Roles: Teachers and Students Learn with Technology , 2004 .

[10]  Henry Braun,et al.  Reconsidering the Impact of High-stakes Testing , 2004 .

[11]  J. Schofield.  Computers and classroom culture , 1995 .

[12]  Michelle Riconscente,et al.  Rhode Island Teachers and Technology Initiative: Findings from the Pilot Implementation Year. , 1998 .

[13]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[14]  Rachel A. Vannatta,et al.  Teacher Dispositions as Predictors of Classroom Technology Use , 2004 .

[15]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[16]  Judy M. Parr.  Extending Educational Computing , 1999 .

[17]  Helle Mathiasen.  Expectations of Technology , 2004 .

[18]  Janet C. Fairman,et al.  The Maine Learning Technology Initiative: Teacher, Student, and School Perspectives, Mid-Year Evaluation Report , 2003 .

[19]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[20]  R. Kozma.  Technology and Classroom Practices , 2003 .

[21]  J. Schofield,et al.  Professional Cultures and Collaborative Efforts: A Case Study of Technologists and Educators Working for Change , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[22]  J. H. Sandholtz,et al.  Teachers, Not Technicians: Rethinking Technical Expectations for Teachers , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.