Selection of model parameter correlations in a rate-based CO2 absorber model aimed for process simulation

Abstract The selection of model parameter correlations, such as for physical properties, kinetics, heat- and mass transfer, and their effect on the mass and energy balance model are investigated. Two different cases based on different process conditions and data from two different pilot plants are studied. In the first case the conditions near the bottom of the absorber is close to chemical equilibrium while in the other the conditions are far from equilibrium. The model predictions from the two cases are compared with the respective pilot plant performance data. As expected, the sensitivity to transport parameters is low when close to equilibrium conditions. However, there is no clear trend with respect to the effect of the various approaches for the model parameters and thus the proper choice seems highly dependent on the operating conditions of the specific plant to be simulated.

[1]  Meng-Hui Li,et al.  Heat Capacity of Alkanolamine Aqueous Solutions , 1999 .

[2]  S. Asai,et al.  The kinetics of reactions of carbon dioxide with monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine by a rapid mixing method , 1977 .

[3]  C. Geankoplis,et al.  Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles , 2003 .

[4]  Hiroshi Takeuchi,et al.  MASS TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS BETWEEN GAS AND LIQUID PHASES IN PACKED COLUMNS , 1968 .

[5]  Ralph H. Weiland,et al.  Density and viscosity of some partially carbonated aqueous alkanolamine solutions and their blends , 1998 .

[6]  Tariq Mahmud,et al.  Modelling reactive absorption of CO2 in packed columns for post-combustion carbon capture applications , 2011 .

[7]  Inna Kim Heat of reaction and VLE of post combustion CO2 absorbents , 2009 .

[8]  Qing Zhou,et al.  A comparison of two data analysis techniques and their applications for modeling the carbon dioxide capture process , 2010, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[9]  Ali Zakeri,et al.  A comparison of different parameter correlation models and the validation of an MEA-based absorber model , 2011 .

[10]  L. Hepler,et al.  Viscosity of aqueous solutions of n-methyldiethanolamine and of diethanolamine , 1994 .

[11]  Ralph H. Weiland,et al.  Heat Capacity of Aqueous Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, N-Methyldiethanolamine, and N-Methyldiethanolamine-Based Blends with Carbon Dioxide , 1997 .

[12]  Amyn S. Teja,et al.  Densities and viscosities of the ethanolamines , 1992 .

[13]  Geert Versteeg,et al.  ON THE KINETICS BETWEEN CO2 AND ALKANOLAMINES BOTH IN AQUEOUS AND NON-AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS. AN OVERVIEW , 1996 .

[14]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[15]  Axel Meisen,et al.  Predict amine solution properties accurately , 1996 .

[16]  Reinhard Billet,et al.  Packed Towers: In Processing and Environmental Technology , 1995 .

[17]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Effects of the Temperature Bulge in CO2 Absorption from Flue Gas by Aqueous Monoethanolamine , 2008 .

[18]  H. M. Kvamsdal,et al.  Dynamic modeling and simulation of a CO2 absorber column for post-combustion CO2 capture , 2009 .

[19]  Hallvard F. Svendsen,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Study of Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Aqueous Alkanolamine Solutions Using a Membrane Contactor , 2004 .