A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil

SummaryThe potential of drip irrigation to increase irrigation water use efficiency, to decrease waterlogging caused by irrigation, and to conserve soil structure, especially when combined with reduced tillage was studied in an experiment comparing surface (SD) and buried (BD) methods of drip irrigation with furrow irrigation (F) of cotton in a cracking grey clay (vertisol) over four seasons. Drip-irrigated treatments were maintained at a nominal deficit of 45 mm below the fully-irrigated soil water content, while F was irrigated when the deficit reached about 90 mm. Water use efficiency (WUE) was calculated as the ratio between lint yield and total water received by the crop. The WUE of cotton was 16% higher under drip irrigation (2.23 kg ha−1 mm−1) than under F (1.89 kg ha−1 mm−1) when supply channel losses and runoff losses in F were considered. However, similar WUE was obtained for the net water stored in the field using either method of irrigation. The ability of drip irrigation to improve WUE by avoiding deep percolation losses of irrigation water was not an advantage in this soil because furrow irrigation water does not infiltrate beyond the root zone of cotton. Waterlogging occurred in all treatments in the wet season. In the absence of heavy rainfall, waterlogging was not an important factor in this study because drip irrigation avoided waterlogging and good field slope kept the ridges well-drained during furrow irrigation. However, in waterlogging-prone fields or wet seasons, less root activity and low yields are likely to further reduce the WUE. The crop achieved its final root distribution through the soil during early boll filling, with most of the root system in the 0–0.3 m depth of soil in all treatments, but more so under BD. There were more roots and more deep roots under F than under drip. The distribution of roots and root activity followed the distribution of water in the soil. Early-season water extraction profiles were similar for each treatment, but by mid-season there was more water extracted from below the 0.6 m depth in F (16–19% of total) than in BD (8–12%). The clod specific volume of the surface 0–0.1 m of soil was higher in BD (0.718m3 Mg−1) than in F (0.693 m3 Mg−1), and was related to less cultivation and slower wetting in BD than in F, which help to conserve soil aggregates and pores and maintain soil structure. We conclude that the WUE of furrow irrigation in this soil is relatively high and that similar efficiency to drip irrigation can be achieved by improving furrow irrigation management: by reducing transmission losses between pump and field, by reducing runoff losses from the field, by recirculating runoff water, and by reducing waterlogging.

[1]  F. M. Eaton,et al.  SUGAR MOVEMENT TO ROOTS, MINERAL UPTAKE, AND THE GROWTH CYCLE OF THE COTTON PLANT. , 1944, Plant physiology.

[2]  K. Chan,et al.  Field calibration of a neutron moisture meter in a cracking grey clay , 1987, Irrigation Science.

[3]  G. Constable.  Temperature effects on the early field development of cotton , 1976 .

[4]  G. S. Sekhon,et al.  Rooting pattern, nutrient uptake and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoideum pers.) and cotton (Gossypium herbaceum) as affected by nutrient availability from the surface and subsurface soil layers , 1985 .

[5]  G. Constable,et al.  A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil , 1990, Irrigation Science.

[6]  D. F. Wanjura,et al.  COTTON LINT YIELD ACCUMULATION RATE AND QUALITY DEVELOPMENT , 1985 .

[7]  O. Kramer,et al.  Nitrogen fertilizer management of cotton grown under drip irrigation in a grumusol , 1986, Irrigation Science.

[8]  Ky Chan,et al.  Moisture regimes of a cracking clay soil under furrow irrigated cotton , 1981 .

[9]  A. Hearn,et al.  Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment , 1980, Irrigation Science.

[10]  A. Hearn,et al.  Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment VII. Evaluation of irrigation strategies for cotton , 1984, Irrigation Science.

[11]  D. Tennant,et al.  A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length , 1975 .

[12]  J. Quisenberry,et al.  Influence of Indeterminate Growth Habit on Yield and Irrigation Water-use Efficiency in Upland Cotton 1 , 1976 .

[13]  A. Hearn,et al.  Water relationships in cotton , 1980 .

[14]  M. J. Brown,et al.  Subsurface Trickle Irrigation Management with Multiple Cropping , 1981 .

[15]  Radiant energy conversion in three cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris , 1985 .

[16]  David T. Clarkson,et al.  Factors Affecting Mineral Nutrient Acquisition by Plants , 1985 .

[17]  J. G. Marshall,et al.  Effects of Okra Leaf Shape on Boll Rot, Yield, and Other Important Characters of Upland Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.1 , 1969 .

[18]  G. Constable.  Narrow row cotton in the Namoi valley. 1. Growth, yield and quality of four cultivars , 1977 .

[19]  An analysis of the environmental limitation to yield of irrigated grain sorghum during the dry season in tropical Australia using a radiation, interception model , 1986 .

[20]  Lloyd T. Wilson,et al.  Computer-based cotton pest management in Australia , 1981 .

[21]  A. Hearn.  Effect of preceding crop on the nitrogen requirements of irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on a vertisol , 1986 .

[22]  R. G. Smith,et al.  Irrigation scheduling of cotton in a climate with uncertain rainfall , 1981, Irrigation Science.

[23]  I. Rochester,et al.  A comparison of drip and furrow irrigated cotton on a cracking clay soil , 1990, Irrigation Science.

[24]  K. El-Zik.  Integrated control of Verticillium wilt of cotton. , 1985 .

[25]  J. W. Radin,et al.  Water Uptake by Cotton Roots during Fruit Filling in Relation to Irrigation Frequency , 1989 .

[26]  I. Rochester,et al.  Nitrogen Application to Cotton on Clay Soil: Timing and Soil Testing , 1988 .

[27]  G. Constable,et al.  The effect of planting date on the yield and some fibre properties of cotton in the Namoi Valley , 1976 .

[28]  A. Hearn,et al.  Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment , 1981, Irrigation Science.

[29]  A. Carmi,et al.  Cotton growth and production under drip-irrigation restricted soil wetting , 1988, Irrigation Science.

[30]  E. Newman,et al.  A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE TOTAL LENGTH OF ROOT IN A SAMPLE , 1966 .

[31]  A. Carmi.  Effects of root zone volume and plant density on the vegetative and reproductive development of cotton , 1986 .

[32]  N. Thomson.  Effects of the superokra leaf gene on cotton growth, yield, and quality , 1972 .

[33]  A. Hodgson.  The Effects of Duration, Timing and Chemical Amelioration of Short-term Waterlogging During Furrow Irrigation of Cotton in a Cracking Grey Clay , 1982 .

[34]  B. L. McMichael,et al.  Planting pattern effects on yield, water use and root growth of cotton , 1986 .

[35]  R. Isbell,et al.  A description of Australian soils. , 1975 .

[36]  J. H. Cushman.  Numerical study of some age-dependent parameters in root nutrient uptake , 1984, Plant and Soil.

[37]  R. Allmaras,et al.  Quantitative Estimation of Living Wheat‐Root Lengths in Soil Cores1 , 1978 .

[38]  D. Macleod,et al.  Effects of foliar applied nitrogen fertilizer on cotton waterlogged in a cracking grey clay , 1987 .

[39]  Ky Chan,et al.  The effect of short-term waterlogging during furrow irrigation of cotton in a cracking grey clay , 1982 .

[40]  H. M. Taylor,et al.  Water Relations and Growth of Cotton in Drying Soil1 , 1973 .

[41]  G. Constable.  Growth and light receipt by mainstem cotton leaves in relation to plant density in the field , 1986 .

[42]  A. Meiri,et al.  Drip irrigation of cotton with saline-sodic water , 1985, Irrigation Science.

[43]  D. Edwards,et al.  Decreased Rates of Nitrate Uptake During Pod Fill by Cowpea, Green Gram, and Soybean , 1988 .

[44]  R. G. Smith,et al.  Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment , 1980, Irrigation Science.

[45]  I. Daniells.  Degradation and restoration of soil structure in a cracking grey clay used for cotton production , 1989 .

[46]  D. Charles-Edwards,et al.  An analysis of the growth of mung beans at a range of plant densities in tropical Australia. I. Dry matter production , 1982 .

[47]  F. Crowther.  Studies in Growth Analysis of the Cotton Plant under Irrigation in the SudanI. The Effects of Different Combinations of Nitrogen Applications and Water-supply , 1934 .

[48]  D. Macleod,et al.  Seasonal and Soil Fertility Effects on the Response of Waterlogged Cotton to Foliar‐Applied Nitrogen Fertilizer , 1988 .

[49]  D. Macleod,et al.  Use of Oxygen Flux Density to Estimate Critical Air‐filled Porosity of a Vertisol , 1989 .

[50]  J. R. Gipson,et al.  Influence of Night Temperature on Growth and Development of Cotton (Gossypium birsutum L.). II Fiber Properties1 , 1968 .

[51]  A. Hearn,et al.  Response of cotton to water and nitrogen in a tropical environment: I. Frequency of watering and method of application of nitrogen , 1975, The Journal of Agricultural Science.