Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies

A key element of most recently proposed plant strategy schemes is an axis of resource capture, usage and availability. In the search for a simple, robust plant trait (or traits) that will allow plants to be located on this axis, specific leaf area is one of the leading contenders. Using a large new unpublished database, we examine the variability of specific leaf area and other leaf traits, the relationships between them, and their ability to predict position on the resource use axis. Specific leaf area is found to suffer from a number of drawbacks; it is both very variable between replicates and much influenced by leaf thickness. Leaf dry-matter content (sometimes referred to as tissue density) is much less variable, largely independent of leaf thickness and a better predictor of location on an axis of resource capture, usage and availability. However, it is not clear how useful dry matter content will be outside northwest Europe, and in particular in dry climates with many succulents.

[1]  John A. Gamon,et al.  Assessing leaf pigment content and activity with a reflectometer , 1999 .

[2]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Leaf structure and defence control litter decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional floras on two continents , 1999 .

[3]  P. Reich,et al.  Low-light carbon balance and shade tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: Do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ? , 1999 .

[4]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Allocating C-S-R plant functional types : a soft approach to a hard problem , 1999 .

[5]  J. Bakker,et al.  Ecological correlates of seed size in the British flora , 1998 .

[6]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale , 1998 .

[7]  A. Werf,et al.  The importance of relative growth rate and associated traits for competition between species during vegetation succession , 1998 .

[8]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent variation in plant growth : physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences , 1998 .

[9]  P. Grubb.  A reassessment of the strategies of plants which cope with shortages of resources , 1998 .

[10]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species , 1998 .

[11]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Primary productivity and trophic dynamics investigated in a North Derbyshire, UK, dale , 1997 .

[12]  S. Díaz,et al.  Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change , 1997 .

[13]  S. R. Band,et al.  A comparative study of leaf nutrient concentrations in a regional herbaceous flora. , 1997, The New phytologist.

[14]  E. Garnier,et al.  Specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration in annual and perennial grass species growing in Mediterranean old-fields , 1997, Oecologia.

[15]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[16]  K. Thompson,et al.  A new apparatus to measure the rate of fall of seeds , 1997 .

[17]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. , 1997, The New phytologist.

[18]  Ken Thompson,et al.  Evidence of a causal connection between anti-herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leaves , 1996 .

[19]  Peter Ryser,et al.  The importance of tissue density for growth and life span of leaves and roots: a comparison of five ecologically contrasting grasses , 1996 .

[20]  D. V. Dorp,et al.  Seed dispersal capacity of six perennial grassland species measured in a wind tunnel at varying wind speed and height , 1996 .

[21]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[22]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Testing predictions of the resistance and resilience of vegetation subjected to extreme events , 1995 .

[23]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[24]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Structured interspecific determinants of specific leaf area in 34 species of herbaceous angiosperms , 1995 .

[25]  E. Garnier,et al.  Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1994 .

[26]  A. Freijsen,et al.  On ecological inference from laboratory experiments conducted under optimum conditions , 1994 .

[27]  M. Dong.  Morphological plasticity of the clonal herb Lamiastrum galeobdolon (L.) Ehrend. & Polatschek in response to partial shading. , 1993, The New phytologist.

[28]  D. Greene,et al.  Seed mass and dispersal capacity in wind-dispersed diaspores , 1993 .

[29]  Seasonal and year to year variation in performance of Gordonia acuminata seedlings in different light environments , 1992 .

[30]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[31]  Ruprecht Düll,et al.  Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa , 1992 .

[32]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[33]  C. Stace.  New Flora Of The British Isles , 1998 .

[34]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits , 1988, Nature.

[35]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore Defense , 1985, Science.

[36]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. , 1975 .