Long-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to the JNC VI risk stratification.

Blood pressure (BP) levels alone have been traditionally used to make treatment decisions in patients with hypertension. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) recently recommended that risk strata, in addition to BP levels, be considered in the treatment of hypertension. We estimated the absolute benefit associated with a 12 mm Hg reduction in systolic BP over 10 years according to the risk stratification system of JNC VI using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. The number-needed-to-treat to prevent a cardiovascular event/death or a death from all causes was reduced with increasing levels of baseline BP in each of the risk strata. In addition, the number-needed-to-treat was much smaller in persons with > or =1 additional major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (risk group B) and in those with a history of cardiovascular disease or target organ damage (risk group C) than in those without additional major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (risk group A). Specifically, the number-needed-to-treat to prevent a death from all causes in patients with a high-normal BP, stage 1 hypertension, or stage 2 or 3 hypertension was, respectively, 81, 60, and 23 for those in risk group A; 19, 16, and 9 for those in risk group B; and 14, 12, and 9 for those in risk group C. Our analysis indicated that the absolute benefits of antihypertensive therapy depended on BP as well as the presence or absence of additional cardiovascular disease risk factors and the presence or absence of preexisting clinical cardiovascular disease or target organ damage.

[1]  P Whelton,et al.  Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991. , 1995, Hypertension.

[2]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 , 1998, BMJ.

[3]  J. Mclaughlin,et al.  Reliability of surrogate information on cigarette smoking by type of informant. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  J. Feldman,et al.  Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study: 1982-84. , 1987, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[5]  Detection The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) , 1997 .

[6]  J. Larosa,et al.  Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1999, JAMA.

[7]  C. Maynard Understanding racial differences in the use of thrombolytic therapy: what more do we need to know? , 1999, American heart journal.

[8]  J. Feldman,et al.  Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study, 1992. , 1997, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[9]  D L Sackett,et al.  An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Feldman,et al.  Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study, 1986. , 1990, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[11]  H. Gerstein,et al.  The association of microalbuminuria and mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A systematic overview of the literature. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  J. Feldman,et al.  Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study, 1987. , 1992, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[13]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context , 1990, The Lancet.

[14]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[15]  J. Madans,et al.  Validity of mortality analysis based on retrospective smoking information. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  J. Madans,et al.  Differences in morbidity measures and risk factor identification using multiple data sources: the case of coronary heart disease. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  D. Sackett,et al.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect , 1995, BMJ.

[18]  A J Belanger,et al.  Epidemiology of heart failure. , 1991, American heart journal.

[19]  R. Weinshilboum,et al.  The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  P. Whelton,et al.  Elevated systolic blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular and renal disease: overview of evidence from observational epidemiologic studies and randomized controlled trials. , 1999, American heart journal.

[21]  Director,et al.  Plan and operation of the health and nutrition examination survey: United States-1971-1973. , 1973, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[22]  Jiang He,et al.  Effect of Statins on Risk of Coronary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2000 .

[23]  J. Feldman,et al.  Plan and operation of the HANES I augmentation survey of adults 25-74 years United States, 1974-1975. , 1978, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[24]  P. Whelton,et al.  Blood pressure and end-stage renal disease in men. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Jessica A. Mayer,et al.  Recent evidence on drug therapy of mild to moderate hypertension and decreased risk of coronary heart disease. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[26]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias , 1990, The Lancet.