MRI‐Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset

Background Under current guidelines, intravenous thrombolysis is used to treat acute stroke only if it can be ascertained that the time since the onset of symptoms was less than 4.5 hours. We sought to determine whether patients with stroke with an unknown time of onset and features suggesting recent cerebral infarction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would benefit from thrombolysis with the use of intravenous alteplase. Methods In a multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients who had an unknown time of onset of stroke to receive either intravenous alteplase or placebo. All the patients had an ischemic lesion that was visible on MRI diffusion‐weighted imaging but no parenchymal hyperintensity on fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), which indicated that the stroke had occurred approximately within the previous 4.5 hours. We excluded patients for whom thrombectomy was planned. The primary end point was favorable outcome, as defined by a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale of neurologic disability (which ranges from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. A secondary outcome was the likelihood that alteplase would lead to lower ordinal scores on the modified Rankin scale than would placebo (shift analysis). Results The trial was stopped early owing to cessation of funding after the enrollment of 503 of an anticipated 800 patients. Of these patients, 254 were randomly assigned to receive alteplase and 249 to receive placebo. A favorable outcome at 90 days was reported in 131 of 246 patients (53.3%) in the alteplase group and in 102 of 244 patients (41.8%) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 2.36; P=0.02). The median score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 1 in the alteplase group and 2 in the placebo group (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.23; P=0.003). There were 10 deaths (4.1%) in the alteplase group and 3 (1.2%) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 0.92 to 12.52; P=0.07). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 2.0% in the alteplase group and 0.4% in the placebo group (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 0.57 to 42.87; P=0.15). Conclusions In patients with acute stroke with an unknown time of onset, intravenous alteplase guided by a mismatch between diffusion‐weighted imaging and FLAIR in the region of ischemia resulted in a significantly better functional outcome and numerically more intracranial hemorrhages than placebo at 90 days. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program; WAKE‐UP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01525290; and EudraCT number, 2011‐005906‐32.)

[1]  E. Lindsay Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct , 2018 .

[2]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Stroke With Unknown Time of Symptom Onset: Baseline Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data of the First Thousand Patients in WAKE-UP (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke A Randomized, Doubleblind, Placebo-Controlled Trial) , 2017, Stroke.

[4]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Effects of Alteplase for Acute Stroke on the Distribution of Functional Outcomes: A Pooled Analysis of 9 Trials , 2016, Stroke.

[5]  A. Demchuk,et al.  The Heidelberg Bleeding Classification: Classification of Bleeding Events After Ischemic Stroke and Reperfusion Therapy. , 2015, Stroke.

[6]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2014 .

[7]  Ivana Galinovic,et al.  A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Test Efficacy and Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-up Stroke (WAKE-UP) , 2014, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[8]  S. Pedraza,et al.  Visual and Region of Interest–Based Inter-Rater Agreement in the Assessment of the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging– Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch , 2014, Stroke.

[9]  G. Thomalla,et al.  Wake-Up Stroke: Clinical Characteristics, Imaging Findings, and Treatment Option – an Update , 2013, Front. Neurol..

[10]  M. Wintermark,et al.  Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2013, Stroke.

[11]  Ivana Galinovic,et al.  DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study , 2011, The Lancet Neurology.

[12]  Karen L. Furie,et al.  Response to Letter by Naylor Regarding Article, “Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association” , 2011 .

[13]  R. Hornung,et al.  Population-based study of wake-up strokes , 2011, Neurology.

[14]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  MR imaging helps predict time from symptom onset in patients with acute stroke: implications for patients with unknown onset time. , 2010, Radiology.

[15]  K. Kimura,et al.  FLAIR can estimate the onset time in acute ischemic stroke patients , 2010, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[16]  Gregory W Albers,et al.  Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[17]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Negative fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery imaging identifies acute ischemic stroke at 3 hours or less , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[18]  G. Moneta,et al.  Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 Hours after Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2009 .

[19]  Gary A. Ford,et al.  Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. , 2008, Cerebrovascular diseases.

[20]  Werner Hacke,et al.  Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study , 2007, The Lancet.

[21]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[22]  G. Schlaug,et al.  The Stroke Patient Who Woke Up: Clinical and Radiological Features, Including Diffusion and Perfusion MRI , 2002, Stroke.

[23]  M. Kaste,et al.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II) , 1998, The Lancet.

[24]  Koroshetz Wj,et al.  Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.