Bounding the future: The use of scenarios in assessing climate change impacts

This paper investigates the contribution of socio-economic scenarios to improve decisions and policies in climate assessments. We specifically looked at adaptation projects in the Dutch Climate changes Spatial Planning programme. Based on the four decision failure criteria neglect of internal information, bounded rationality, insufficient expansion of existing mental models and stickiness and lack of friction of information and knowledge, it was concluded that in these projects, socio-economic scenarios appear to generate useful data, but that their full potential to reduce decision failure is not likely to be exploited. Therefore adaptation options suggested by these studies may not be ‘future-proof’: they may be appropriate in some future societies, but fail in others. We believe similar results would be obtained in other contexts. Possible decision failures are caused by neglecting socio-economic developments, limiting the number of storylines generated by scenario studies to one or two, lack of stakeholder involvement in the scenario development and ignoring discontinuities.

[1]  H. Simon.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[2]  I. Lorenzoni.  A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment — Part II: A scenario-based case study in East Anglia (UK) , 2000 .

[3]  P. Bubeck,et al.  Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area , 2010 .

[4]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Analysing the costs and benefits of climate policy: Value judgements and scientific uncertainties , 2008 .

[5]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Constructing “not Implausible” Climate and Economic Scenarios for Egypt , 2001 .

[6]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Aandacht voor veiligheid , 2008 .

[7]  W. Deursen,et al.  A method to develop sustainable water management strategies for an uncertain future , 2011 .

[8]  F. Boekema,et al.  Welvaart en leefomgeving : Een scenariostudie voor Nederland in 2040 , 2007 .

[9]  J. Hertin,et al.  Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’ , 2002 .

[10]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[11]  R. Tol.  Socio-Economic Scenarios , 1998 .

[12]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  Improving decision-making with scenario planning , 2004 .

[13]  Marjolein B.A. van Asselt,et al.  Practising the scenario-axes technique , 2006 .

[14]  Noor van der Hoeven,et al.  Integrated scenarios of socio-economic and climate change , 2007 .

[15]  Ralph Lasage,et al.  Towards a Climate-Proof Netherlands , 2009 .

[16]  Deltacommissie.  Samen Werken met water: Een land dat leeft, bouwt aan zijn toekomst , 2008 .

[17]  Asit K. Biswas,et al.  Water management in 2020 and beyond , 2009 .

[18]  J. A. Wardekker,et al.  Frame-based guide to situated decision-making on climate change , 2009 .

[19]  Edward A. Parson,et al.  Useful global-change scenarios: current issues and challenges , 2008 .

[20]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[21]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[22]  Joel B. Smith,et al.  Handbook on Methods for Climate Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation Strategies , 1998 .

[23]  E. P. Querner,et al.  Effects of water level strategies in Dutch peatlands: a scenario study for the polder Zegveld , 2008 .

[24]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment: Part I. Integrating socio-economic and climate change scenarios , 2000 .