Overview of the New Version 3 NASA Micro-Pulse Lidar Network (MPLNET) Automatic Precipitation Detection Algorithm

Precipitation modifies atmospheric column thermodynamics through the process of evaporation and serves as a proxy for latent heat modulation. For this reason, a correct precipitation parameterization (especially for low-intensity precipitation) within global scale models is crucial. In addition to improving our modeling of the hydrological cycle, this will reduce the associated uncertainty of global climate models in correctly forecasting future scenarios, and will enable the application of mitigation strategies. In this manuscript we present a proof of concept algorithm to automatically detect precipitation from lidar measurements obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Micropulse lidar network (MPLNET). The algorithm, once tested and validated against other remote sensing instruments, will be operationally implemented into the network to deliver a near real time (latency <1.5 h) rain masking variable that will be publicly available on MPLNET website as part of the new Version 3 data products. The methodology, based on an image processing technique, detects only light precipitation events (defined by intensity and duration) such as light rain, drizzle, and virga. During heavy rain events, the lidar signal is completely extinguished after a few meters in the precipitation or it is unusable because of water accumulated on the receiver optics. Results from the algorithm, in addition to filling a gap in light rain, drizzle, and virga detection by radars, are of particular interest for the scientific community as they help to fully characterize the aerosol cycle, from emission to deposition, as precipitation is a crucial meteorological phenomenon accelerating atmospheric aerosol removal through the scavenging effect. Algorithm results will also help the understanding of long term aerosol–cloud interactions, exploiting the multi-year database from several MPLNET permanent observational sites across the globe. The algorithm is also applicable to other lidar and/or ceilometer network infrastructures in the framework of the Global Aerosol Watch (GAW) aerosol lidar observation network (GALION).

[1]  Simone Lolli,et al.  Evaluating Light Rain Drop Size Estimates from Multiwavelength Micropulse Lidar Network Profiling , 2013 .

[2]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  Signal-dependent noise modelling and estimation of new-generation imaging spectrometers , 2009, 2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[3]  David D. Turner,et al.  Full-Time, Eye-Safe Cloud and Aerosol Lidar Observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Sites: Instruments and Data Analysis , 2013 .

[4]  Simone Lolli,et al.  Principal Component Analysis Approach to Evaluate Instrument Performances in Developing a Cost-Effective Reliable Instrument Network for Atmospheric Measurements , 2015 .

[5]  S. Yum,et al.  Suppression of very low intensity precipitation in Korea. , 2010 .

[6]  A. Hou,et al.  The Global Precipitation Measurement Mission , 2014 .

[7]  M. Löffler-Mang,et al.  An Optical Disdrometer for Measuring Size and Velocity of Hydrometeors , 2000 .

[8]  P. Di Girolamo,et al.  Rain Evaporation Rate Estimates from Dual-Wavelength Lidar Measurements and Intercomparison against a Model Analytical Solution , 2017 .

[9]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Applying Advanced Ground-Based Remote Sensing in the Southeast Asian Maritime Continent to Characterize Regional Proficiencies in Smoke Transport Modeling , 2016 .

[10]  Leo Pio D'Adderio,et al.  Evolution of drop size distribution in natural rain , 2018 .

[11]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[12]  Ellsworth J. Welton,et al.  Global monitoring of clouds and aerosols using a network of micropulse lidar systems , 2001, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[13]  Albert Mendoza,et al.  Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique. , 2007, Optics express.

[14]  D. Randall,et al.  Mission to planet Earth: Role of clouds and radiation in climate , 1995 .

[15]  NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Micropulse Lidar Signals: Uncertainty Analysis , 2002 .

[16]  R. Koster,et al.  Variance and Predictability of Precipitation at Seasonal-to-Interannual Timescales , 2000 .

[17]  Doina Nicolae,et al.  An automatic observation-based aerosol typing method for EARLINET , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[18]  Michaël Sicard,et al.  Vertically Resolved Precipitation Intensity Retrieved through a Synergy between the Ground-Based NASA MPLNET Lidar Network Measurements, Surface Disdrometer Datasets and an Analytical Model Solution , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[19]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET: towards an advanced sustainable European aerosol lidar network , 2014 .

[20]  P. Stier,et al.  Wet scavenging limits the detection of aerosol effects on precipitation , 2015 .

[21]  Michael G. Bosilovich,et al.  Global Changes of the Water Cycle Intensity , 2013 .

[22]  Michael J. Garay,et al.  Attributing Accelerated Summertime Warming in the Southeast United States to Recent Reductions in Aerosol Burden: Indications from Vertically-Resolved Observations , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Luc R. Bissonnette,et al.  Range–Height Scans of Lidar Depolarization for Characterizing Properties and Phase of Clouds and Precipitation , 2001 .

[24]  Jasper R. Lewis,et al.  Overview of MPLNET Version 3 Cloud Detection. , 2016, Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology.

[25]  M. Ciofini,et al.  Diffractive optical components for high power laser beam sampling , 2003 .

[26]  D. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm , 2009 .

[27]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Estimating drizzle drop size and precipitation rate using two-colour lidar measurements , 2010 .

[28]  D. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO Lidar Description and Performance Assessment , 2009 .

[29]  Yu Gu,et al.  Impact of varying lidar measurement and data processing techniques in evaluating cirrus cloud and aerosol direct radiative effects , 2018 .

[30]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[31]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[32]  James D. Spinhirne,et al.  Compact Eye Safe Lidar Systems , 1995 .

[33]  Yu Gu,et al.  Daytime Cirrus Cloud Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Forcing Properties at a Midlatitude Site and their Global Consequence. , 2016, Journal of applied meteorology and climatology.

[34]  Simone Lolli,et al.  Assessment of aerosol optical property and radiative effect for the layer decoupling cases over the northern South China Sea during the 7‐SEAS/Dongsha Experiment , 2016 .

[35]  E. Vermote,et al.  The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation , 2005 .

[36]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Daytime Top-of-the-Atmosphere Cirrus Cloud Radiative Forcing Properties at Singapore , 2017 .

[37]  Pierre H. Flamant,et al.  0.355-micrometer direct detection wind lidar under testing during a field campaign in consideration of ESA's ADM-Aeolus mission , 2013 .