A laboratory study of single-well steam-assisted gravity drainage process

Abstract An investigation of the optimization of startup procedure for single-well steam-assisted gravity drainage (SW-SAGD) was made as the project economics are influenced significantly by the early production response. An experimental investigation of two early-time processes namely cyclic steam injection and steam circulation to improve reservoir heating is discussed and compared to continuous steam injection as well as other well configurations like vertical injector–horizontal producer and horizontal injector–horizontal producer. Crushed limestone saturated with heavy oil (12.8° API) and water was packed in a laboratory model for the experiments. The effectiveness of the methods is compared within themselves and to conventional steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) by measuring the size of the steam chamber as a function of time. The steam chamber area for cyclic steam injection is slightly greater than that of steam circulation case. Furthermore, numerical simulation studies of different early-time processes were conducted and compared to the experimental data using a commercial simulator. It was observed that the numerical model results underestimated the cumulative oil recovery and the steam chamber size. Results from this study, including cumulative recoveries, temperature distributions, and production rates display the differences between the methods.

[1]  K. H. Chung,et al.  Geometrical Effect Of Steam Injection On The Formation Of Emulsions Nn The Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process , 1988 .

[2]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  SAGD Comes of AGE , 1998 .

[3]  Mustafa Versan Kok,et al.  Oxidation of Heavy Oil and Their SARA Fractions: Its Role in Modeling In-Situ Combustion , 2000 .

[4]  Kyuro Sasaki,et al.  Experimental Modelling of the SAGD Process 3/4 Enhancing SAGD Performance with Periodic Stimulation of the Horizontal Producer , 1999 .

[5]  A. R. Kovscek,et al.  Simulation of Early-Time Response of Single-Well Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SW-SAGD) , 1999 .

[6]  Hiroyuki Kosukegawa,et al.  Experimental Study on Initial Stage of SAGD Process Using 2-Dimensional Scaled Model for Heavy Oil Recovery , 1996 .

[7]  R. Butler.  Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen , 1991 .

[8]  Roger M. Butler,et al.  Theoretical studies on the gravity drainage of heavy oil during in‐situ steam heating , 1981 .

[9]  A. E. George,et al.  Scaling Criteria And Model Experiments For Horizontal Wells , 1992 .

[10]  S. D. Joshi,et al.  A Laboratory Study of Thermal Oil Recovery Using Horizontal Wells , 1986 .

[11]  S. M. Farouq Ali.  Is There Life After SAGD , 1997 .

[12]  N. Edmunds.  On the Difficult Birth of SAGD , 1999 .

[13]  K. Chung,et al.  Geometrical Effect Of Steam Injection On The Formation Of Emulsions In The Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Process , 1987 .

[14]  S. M. Farouq Ali,et al.  Experimental modeling of the SAGD process: Enhancing SAGD performance with periodic stimulation of the horizontal producer , 2001 .

[15]  A. K. Singhal,et al.  A Mechanistic Study of Single-Well Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage , 2000 .