Contact Angles of Liquid Drops Subjected to a Rough Boundary

The contact angle of a liquid drop on a rigid surface is determined by the classical theory of Young-Laplace. For chemically homogeneous surfaces, this angle is a constant. We study the minimal-energy configurations of liquid drops on rough surfaces. Here the actual angle is still constant for homogeneous surfaces, but the apparent angle can fluctuate widely. A limit theorem is introduced for minimal energy configuration, where the rigid surface converges to a smooth one, but the roughness parameter is kept constant. It turns out that the limit of minimal energy configurations correspond to liquid drop on a smooth surface with an appropriately defined effective chemical interaction energy. It turns out that the effective chemical interaction depends linearly on the roughness in a certain range of parameters, corresponding to full wetting. Outside this range the most stable configuration corresponds to a partial wetting and the effective interaction energy depends on the geometry in an essential way. This result partially justifies and extends Wenzel and Cassie's laws and can be used to deduce the actual inclination angle in the most stable state, where the apparent one is known by measurement. This, in turn, may be applied to deduce the roughness parameter if the interfacial energy is known, or visa versa.

[1]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS ON HETEROGENEOUS SMOOTH SURFACES , 1994 .

[2]  Tröger,et al.  Determination of the Surface Tension of Microporous Membranes Using Contact Angle Measurements , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[3]  Gershon Wolansky† and,et al.  The actual contact angle on a heterogeneous rough surface in three dimensions , 1998 .

[4]  Y. Naidich,et al.  Wetting and Spreading in Heterogeneous Solid Surface-Metal Melt Systems , 1995 .

[5]  M. Gónzalez-Martín,et al.  Determination of Components of Cassiterite Surface Free Energy from Contact Angle Measurements , 1993 .

[6]  E. Giusti The equilibrium configuration of liquid drops. , 1981 .

[7]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[8]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Contact angle hysteresis and the shape of the three-phase line , 1985 .

[9]  Robert Finn,et al.  Equilibrium Capillary Surfaces , 1985 .

[10]  Chun Huh,et al.  Effects of surface roughness on wetting (theoretical) , 1977 .

[11]  Thomas Young,et al.  An Essay on the Cohesion of Fluids , 1800 .

[12]  Rachid Chebbi,et al.  Capillary Spreading of Liquid Drops on Solid Surfaces , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[13]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Wetting on Hydrophobic Rough Surfaces: To Be Heterogeneous or Not To Be? , 2003 .

[14]  T. Ondarçuhu,et al.  Contact angle hysteresis at the nanoscale , 2013 .

[15]  Norman R. Morrow,et al.  Effect of contact angle on capillary displacement curvatures in pore throats formed by spheres , 1994 .

[16]  E. Giusti Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded variation , 1977 .

[17]  A. Marmur Thermodynamic aspects of contact angle hysteresis , 1994 .

[18]  A singular minimization problem for droplet profiles , 1993, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[19]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Equilibrium contact angles : theory and measurement , 1996 .

[20]  CwickelDory,et al.  Contact angle measurement on rough surfaces: the missing link , 2017 .

[21]  Ashutosh Sharma Equilibrium contact angles and film thicknesses in the apolar and polar systems: role of intermolecular interactions in coexistence of drops with thin films , 1993 .